Evaluation of the Inferior Alveolar Canal by Cross-Sectional Hypocycloidal Tomography

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 339-343

  Aryatawong, Srichinda ^a   Aryatawong, Kasama ^a  

^a PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Implant surgery; Inferior alveolar canal; Mandibular osteotomy; Tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENERAL APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INNERVATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; OSTEOTOMY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; BICUSPID; DENTAL IMPLANTS; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; MOLAR, THIRD; OSTEOTOMY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; STATISTICS; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0034569703     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200009040-00010     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Tetsch P, Strunz V. Schädigung des: Nervus alveolaris inferior durch Implantationen im Unterkieferseitenzahnbereich. Z Zahnärztl Implantologie. 1987;3: 53-57.
2. Higuchi KW, Folmer T, Kultje C. Implant survival rates in partially edentulous patients: A 3-year prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:264-268.
3. Martis CS. Complications after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42:101-107.
4. Purvey TA. Intraoperative complications of sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: Incidence and management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43: 504-509.
5. Coghlan KM, Irvine GH. Neurological damage after sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15:369-371.
6. Yoshida T, Nagamine T, Kobayashi T, et al. Impairment of the inferior alveolar nerve after sagittal split osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1989;17:271-277.
7. Jones DL, Wolford LM, Hartog JM. Comparisons of methods to assess neurosensory alterations following orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1990;5:35-42.
8. Leira J, Gilhuus-Moe OT. Sensory impairment following sagittal split osteotomy for correction of mandibular retrognathism. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1991;6:161-167.
9. Posnick JC, Al-Qattan MM, Stepner NM. Alteration in facial sensibility in adolescents following sagittal split and chin osteotomies of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:920-927.
10. Hallikainen D, IizukaT, Lindgvist C. Cross-sectional tomography in evaluation of patients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 50:1269-1273.
11. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: Comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computer tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:327-332.
12. Gher ME, Richardson AC. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1995;15:268-283.
13. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, et al. Interpretation of linear and computer tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontol. 1993;64: 1243-1249.
14. Williams MYA, Mealy BL, Hallmon WW. The role of computerized tomography in dental implantology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:373-380.
15. Clark DE, Danforth RA, Barnes RW, et al. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiology: A comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques. J Oral Implantol. 1990;16:156-164.
16. Ekestubbe A, Thilander A, Gröndahl K, et al. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: Comparison with conventional tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993;22:13-17.
17. Engelmann MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy PK. Optimal placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 59:467-473.
18. Poon C-K, Barss TK, Murdoch-Kinch CA, et al. Presurgical tomographic assessment for dental implants: Part I. A modified imaging technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:246-250.
19. Ismail YH, Azarbal M, Kapa SF. Conventional linear tomography: Protocol for assessing endosseous implant sites. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:153-157.
20. Kassebaum DK, Nummikoshi PV, Triplett RG, et al. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;70:674-678.
21. Knoernschild KL, Aquilino SA, Ruprecht A. Transcranial radiography and linear tomography: A comparative study. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:239-250.
22. Kassebaum DK, Stoller NH, Goshorn BI. Radiographic techniques for presurgical assessment of dental implant sites. Gen Dent. 1992;12:502-505.
23. Miles DA, Van Dis ML. Implant radiology. Dent Clin North Am. 1993;37: 645-667.
24. Lee SY, Morgano SM. A diagnostic stent for endosseous implants to improve conventional tomographic radiographs. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:482-485.
25. Silverstein LH, Melkonian RW, Kurtzmen D, et al. Linear tomography in conjunction with pantomography in the assessment of dental implant recipient sites. J Oral Implant. 1994;20:111-117.
26. Frederiksen NL. Specialized radiographic techniques. In: Goaz PW, White SC, eds. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation, 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1994:266-268.
27. Kassebaum DK, McDowell JD. Tomography. Dent Clin North Am. 1993; 37:567-574.
28. Butterfield KJ, Dagenais M, Clokie C. Linear tomography's clinical accuracy and validity for presurgical dental implant analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84:203-209.
29. Friedland B, Valachovic RW. Advanced imaging techniques assist in implant planning. J Massachusetts Dent Soc. 1997;45:44-50.
30. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37-46.
31. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Visualization of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:90-97.
32. Gröndahl H-G. Radiographic examination. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, eds. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, 3rd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1998:878-884.
33. Thunthy KH, Weinberg R. Effects of tomographic motion, slice thickness, and object thickness on film density. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;81:368-373.
34. Tammisalo E, Hallikainen D, Kanerva H, et al. Comprehensive oral x-ray diagnosis: Scanora multimodal radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1992;21:9-15.
35. Carter RB, Keen EN. The intra-mandibular course of inferior alveolar nerve. J Anat 1971;108:433-440.
36. Heasman PA. Variation in the position of the inferior dental canal and its significance to restorative dentistry. J Dent. 1988;16:36-39.
37. Denio D, Torabinejad M, Bakland LK. Anatomical relationship of the mandibular canal to its surrounding structures in mature mandibles. J Endodont. 1992; 18:161-165.
38. Gowgiel JM. The position and course of the mandibular canal. J Oral Implant. 1992;18:383-385.