Incidentally activated knowledge and stereotype based judgments: A consideration of primed construct-target attribute match

Social Cognition

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 377-399

  Corneille, Olivier ^a   Vescio, Theresa K ^b   Judd, Charles M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034563251     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2000.18.4.377     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Banaji, M. R., Hardin, C., & Rothman, A. J. (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 272-281.
2. Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. A. Bargh, & J. S. Uleman (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). New York: Guilford.
3. Bargh, J. A. (1994). Being unaware of the stimulus versus unaware of how it is interpreted: Why subliminality per se does not matter to social psychology. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Perception without awareness (pp. 236-255). New York: Guilford.
4. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912.
5. Bargh, J. A., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437-449.
6. Bettencourt, B. K., Dill, K. E., Greathouse, S. A., Charlton, K., & Mullholland, A. (1997). Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 244-275.
7. Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Nelson, T. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 485-499.
8. Corneille, O., Leyens, J-Ph, Yzerbyt, V., & Walther, E. (1999). Judgeability concerns: The interplay of information, applicability, and accountability in the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 377-387.
9. Erdley, C. A., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1988). Cognitive and affective components of automatic priming effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 741-747.
10. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., & Lui, T. J. (1989). Unconscious processing and dichoptically masked words. Memory and Cognition, 17, 35-47.
11. Herr, P. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106-1115.
12. Higgins, E. T. (1989). Knowledge accessibility and activation. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 75-123). New York: Guilford.
13. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins and A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford.
14. Higgins, E. T., & Brendl, M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some "activation rules" influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 218-243.
15. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
16. Hilton, J.L., & von Hipple, W. (1990). The role of consistency in judgment of stereotype-relevant behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 430-448.
17. Jackson, L., A., Sullivan, L. A., & Hodge, C. N. (1993). Stereotype effects of attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69-84.
18. Jussim, L., Coleman, L. M., & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536-546.
19. Leyens, J. P., Yzerbyt, V., & Corneille, O. (1996). The role of applicability in the emergence of the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 219-229.
20. Leyens, J. P., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Schadron, G. (1992). The social judgeability approach to stereotypes. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, (Vol. 3, pp. 91-120). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
21. Leyens, J. P., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Schadron, G, (1994). Stereotypes and social cognition. London: Sage.
22. Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
23. Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Yoon, C. (1996). Perceived covariation among the features of ingroup and outgroup members: The outgroup covariation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 421-136.
24. Linville, P. W., & Jones, E. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689-703.
25. Manis, M., Biernat, M., & Nelson, T. F. (1991). Comparison and expectancy processes in human judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 203-211.
26. Manis, M., Nelson, T. E., & Shedler, J. (1988). Stereotypes and social judgment: Extremity, assimilation, and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 28-36.
27. Martin, L. L., Seta, J. J., & Crelia, R. A. (1990). Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37.
28. Moskowitz, G. B., & Skurnik, I. W. (1999). Contrast effects as determined by the type of prime: Trait versus exemplar prime initiate processing strategies that differ in how accessible constructs are used. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 911-927.
29. Mussweiler, T., & Neumann, R. (2000). Sources of mental contamination: Comparing the effects of self-generated versus externally provided primes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 194-206.
30. Schwartz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 217-245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Sedikides, C. (1990). Effects of fortuitously activated constructs versus activated communication goals on person impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 397-108.
32. Sinclair, R. C., Mark, M. M., & Shotland, R. L. (1987). Construct accessibility and generaliz-ability across response categories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 239-252.
33. Skowronski, J. J., Carlston, D. E., & Isham, J. T. (1993). Implicit versus explicit impression formation: The differing effects of overt labeling and covert priming on memory and impressions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 17-41.
34. Smith, E. R. (1989). Procedural efficiency: General and specific components and effects on social judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 500-523.
35. Smith, E. R. (1990). Content and process specificity in the effects of prior experiences. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 1-60). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Smith, E. R., & Branscombe, N. R. (1987). Procedurally mediated social inferences: The case of accessibility effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 361-382.
37. Smith, E. R., & Banscombe, N. R. (1988). Category accessibility as implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 490-504.
38. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
39. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 841-856.
40. Stapel, D. A., & Koomen, W. (1997). Using primed exemplars during impression formation: Interpretation or comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 357-367.?
41. Stapel, D. A., & Koomen, W. (1998). When stereotype activation results in (counter)stereotypical judgments: Priming stereotype-relevant traits and exemplars. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 136-163.
42. Stapel, D. A., Koomen, W., & Van der Pligt, J. (1996). The referents of trait inferences: Impact of traits concepts versus actor-trait links on subsequent judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 437-450.
43. Stapel, D. A., Koomen, W., & Van der Pligt, J. (1997). Categories of category accessibility: The impact of trait concept versus exemplar priming on person judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 44-76.
44. Strack, F. (1992). The different routes to social judgments: Experimental versus informational strategies. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 249-276). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 437-446.
46. Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Kubler, & Wanke, M. (1993). Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 429-442).
47. Vescio, T. K., & Biernat, M. (1999). When stereotype-based expectations impair perceivers' performance: The effect of prejudice, race, and target quality on judgments and perceiver performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 961-969.
48. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36-51.
49. Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on social judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117-142.
50. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and social cognition in its social context. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Leyens, J. P., & Corneille, O. (1998). Social judgeability and the bogus pipeline: The role of naive theories of judgment in impression formation. Social Cognition, 16, 56-77.
52. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Schadron, G., Leyens, J. P., & Rocher, S. (1994). Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 48-55.