Public speaking performance improvement as a function of information processing in immediate and delayed feedback interventions

Communication Education

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 365-374

  King, Paul E ^a   Young, Melissa J ^b   Behnke, Ralph R ^b  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Feedback; Feedback intervention; Information processing; Public speaking

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034550813     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520009379224     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Amato, P. P., & Ostermeier, T. H. (1967). The effect of audience feedback on the beginning public speaker. The Speech Teacher, 16, 56-60.
2. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3, (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
3. Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behaviour. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
4. Ayres, J. (1996). Speech preparation process and speech apprehension. Communication Education, 45, 228-235.
5. Balzer, W. K., Doherty, M. E., & O'Connor, R., Jr. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 410-433.
6. Bangert-Downs, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
7. Beatty, M. J. (1988). Situational and predispositional correlates of public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 37, 28-39.
8. Beck, F. W-, & Lindsey, J. D. (1979). Effects of immediate information feedback and delayed informative feedback on delayed retention. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 735-746.
9. Behnke, R. R., & Beatty, M. J. (1979). Modifying nonverbal behavior of student teachers through immediate video display. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 7, 110-115.
10. Behnke, R. R., & Beatty, M. J. (1977). Critiquing speaker behavior through immediate video display. Communication Education, 26, 345-348.
11. Berger, C. R. (1997). Producing messages under uncertainty. In J. O. Greene, (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 221-244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Book, C. L. (1985). Providing feedback: The research on effective oral and written feedback strategies. Central States Speech Journal, 36, 14-23.
13. Booth-Butterfield, M. (1989). The interpretation of classroom performance feedback: An attributional analysis. Communication Education, 38, 119-131.
14. Butler, R., & Nissan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, talk-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 210-216.
15. Clement, D. A., & Frandsen, K. D. (1976). On conceptual and empirical treatments of feedback in human communication. Communication Monographs, 43, 11-28.
16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence E. Erlbaum.
17. Comstock, J., Rowell, E., & Bowers, J. W. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44, 251-266.
18. Croce, R., Howat, M., & Roswal, G. (1996). Augmented feedback for enhanced skill acquisition in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 507-515.
19. Cusella, L. P. (1987). Feedback motivation and performance. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Robertsand, & L. W. Pooter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 624-678). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Edwards, R. (1990). Sensitivity to feedback and the development of self. Communication Quarterly, 38, 101-111.
21. Edwards, R., & Pledger, L. (1990). Development and construct validation of the sensivity to feedback scale. Communication Research Reports, 7, 83-89.
22. Frandsen, K. D., & Millis, M. A. (1993). On conceptual, theoretical and empirical treatments of feedback in human communication: Fifteen years later. Communication Reports, 6, 79-91.
23. Freeman, T., Sawyer, C. E., & Behnke, R. R. (1997). Behavioral inhibition and the attribution of public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 46, 175-187.
24. Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 287-322.
25. Greene, J. O. (1997). A second generation action assembly theory. In J. O. Greene, (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 151-170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Greene, J. O., Rucker, M. P., Zauss, E. S., & Harris, A. A. (1998). Communication anxiety and the acquisition of message-production skill. Communication Education, 47, 337-347.
27. Jurma, W. E., & Froelich, D. L. (1984). Effects of immediate instructor feedback on group discussion participants. Central States Speech Journal, 35, 178-186.
28. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29. King, P. E., & Behnke, R. R. (1985). Teaching interviewing skills by electronically mediated simulations. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19, 45-48.
30. King, P. E., & Behnke, R. R. (1989a). The effect of time-compressed speech on comprehensive, interpretive, and short-term listening. Human Communication Research, 15, 428-443.
31. King, P. E., & Behnke, R. R. (1989b). Video audience simulation technique. The Southern Communication Journal, 54, 294-303.
32. King, P. E., & Behnke, R. R. (1999). Technology-based instructional feedback intervention. Educational Technology, 39(5), 43-49.
33. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
34. Kulhavy, R. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1972). Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 505-512.
35. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79-97.
36. Langer, E. J. (1979). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
37. Littlejohn, S. W. (1992). Theories of human communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
38. Nyquist, J. L., & Wulff, D. H. (1982). The use of simultaneous feedback to alter teaching behaviors of university instructors. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 18(1), 11-17.
39. Peeck, J., van den Bosch, A. J., & Kreupeling, W. (1985). Effects of informative feedback in relation to retention of initial responses. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 303-313.
40. Quigley, B. L., & Nyquist, J. L. (1992). Using video technology to provide feedback to students in performance courses. Communication Education, 41, 324-334.
41. Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-195.
42. Schroth, M. L. (1995). Variable delay of feedback procedures and subsequent concept formation transfer. Journal of General Psychology, 122, 393-399.
43. Simek, T. C., & O'Brien, R. M. (1978). Immediate auditory feedback to improve putting quickly. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 1133-1134.
44. Sorenson, R. L., & Pickett, T. A. (1986). A test of two teaching strategies designed to improve interview effectiveness: Rating behavior and videotaped feedback. Communication Education, 35, 13-22.
45. Speilberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
46. Swindell, L. K., & Walls, W. F. (1993). Response confidence and the delay retention effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 363-375.
47. Waldron, V. R. (1990). Constrained rationality: Situational influences on information acquisition plans and tactics. Communication Monographs, 57, 184-201.
48. Waldron, V. R. (1997). Toward a theory of interactive conversational planning. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 195-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Wanzer, M. B., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). Teacher socio-communicative style as a correlate of student affect toward teacher and course material. Communication Education, 47, 43-52.