Molecular mode-coupling theory applied to a liquid of diatomic molecules

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 8004-8015

  Winkler, A ^a   Latz, A ^a   Schilling, R ^a   Theis, C ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURRENT DENSITY; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; RELAXATION PROCESSES;

DIATOMIC MOLECULES; MOLECULAR MODE-COUPLING THEORY (MMCT);

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0034516073     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.8004     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Here we always restrict ourselves to the idealized mode-coupling theory, which neglects all ergodicity restoring processes such as, e.g., hopping.
2. W. van Megen and S. M. Underwood, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2776 (1993).
3. W. van Megen and S. M. Underwood, Phys. Rev. E 49, 4206 (1994).
4. W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. E 51, 4626 (1995)
5. Phys. Rev. EW. KobH. C. Andersen52, 4134 (1995).
6. M. Nauroth and W. Kob, Phys. Rev. E 55, 675 (1997).
7. W. Götze, in Liquids, Freezing and Glass Transition, edited by J. P. Hansen, D. Levesque, and J. Zinn-Justin, Les Houches Session LI, 1989 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991).
8. W. Götze and L. Sjögren, Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 241 (1992).
9. R. Schilling in Disorder Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
10. Theme issue on Relaxation Kinetics in Supercooled Liquids–Mode Coupling Theory and Its Experimental Tests, edited by S. Yip [Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. 24, (1995)].
11. W. Götze, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, A1 (1999).
12. H. Z. Cummins, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, A95 (1999).
13. W. Kob, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, R85 (1999).
14. F. Fujara and W. Petry, Europhys. Lett. 4, 921 (1987).
15. H. Z. Cummins, G. Li, W. Du, Y. H. Wang, and G. Q. Shen, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 126, 21 (1997).
16. L. J. Lewis and G. Wahnstrom, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3865 (1994).
17. S. Mossa, R. Di Leonardo, G. Ruocco, and M. Sampoli, e-print cond-mat/9912258.
18. A. Tölle, J. Wuttke, H. Schober, O. G. Randl, and F. Fujara, Eur. Phys. J. B 5, 231 (1998).
19. W. Knaak, F. Mezei, and B. Farago, Europhys. Lett. 7, 529 (1991).
20. G. Li, W. M. Du, X. K. Chen, and H. Z. Cummins, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3867 (1992)
21. H. Z. Cummins , Phys. Rev. E 47, 4223 (1993)
22. N. J. Tao , Phys. Rev. A 44, 6665 (1991).
23. Y. Yang and K. A. Nelson, in Disordered Materials and Interfaces, edited by H. Z. Cummins, D. J. Durian, D. L. Johnson, and H. E. Stanley, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. No. 407 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1996), p. 147.
24. P. Lunkenheimer, A. Pimenov, M. Dressel, B. Schreier, U. Schneider, and A. Loidl, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 126, 123 (1997).
25. J. Wuttke, J. Hernandez, G. Li, G. Coddens, H. Z. Cummins, F. Fujara, W. Petry, and H. Sillescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3052 (1994).
26. J. Wuttke, W. Petry, G. Coddens, and F. Fujara, Phys. Rev. E 52, 4026 (1995).
27. P. Lunkenheimer, A. Pimenov, M. Dressel, Y. G. Goncharov, R. Böhmer, and A. Loidl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 318 (1996).
28. G. Li, W. M. Du, A. Sakai, and H. Z. Cummins, Phys. Rev. A 46, 3343 (1992).
29. Y. Yang and K. A. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4883 (1995).
30. Y. Yang and K. A. Nelson, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 7732 (1995).
31. J. Wuttke, M. Seidl, G. Hinze, A. Tölle, W. Petry, and G. Coddens, Eur. Phys. J. B 1, 169 (1998).
32. F. Sciortino, P. Gallo, P. Tartaglia, and S.-H. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 54, 6331 (1996)
33. P. Gallo, F. Sciortino, P. Tartaglia, and S.-H. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2730 (1996).
34. F. Sciortino, L. Fabbian, S. H. Chen, and P. Tartaglia, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5397 (1997).
35. C. Theis and R. Schilling, Phys. Rev. E 60, 740 (1999).
36. T. Franosch, M. Fuchs, W. Götze, M. R. Mayr, and A. P. Singh, Phys. Rev. E 56, 5659 (1997).
37. H. Z. Cummins, G. Li, W. Du, R. M. Pick, and C. Dreyfus, Phys. Rev. E 53, 896 (1996)
38. Phys. Rev. EH. Z. CumminsG. LiW. DuR. M. PickC. Dreyfus55, 1232 (1997).
39. R. Torre, P. Bartolini, and R. Pick, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1912 (1998).
40. G. Hinze, D. S. Brace, S. D. Gottke, and M. D. Fayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 2437 (2000).
41. H. Sillescu and E. Bartsch, in Disorder Effects on Relaxational Processes, edtied by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
42. E. Rössler and M. Taupitz, in Disorder Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
43. H. W. Spiess and K. Schmidt-Rohr, in Disorder Effects on Relaxational Processes, edited by R. Richert and A. Blumen (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
44. L. Andreozzi, A. Di Schino, M. Giordano, and D. Leporini, Europhys. Lett. 38, 669 (1997).
45. U. Bengtzelius, W. Götze, and A. Sjölander, J. Phys. C 17, 5915 (1984).
46. C. Bennemann, W. Paul, K. Binder, and B. Dünweg, Phys. Rev. E 57, 843 (1998).
47. W. Götze and M. Mayr, Phys. Rev. E 61, 587 (2000).
48. W. Götze, A. P. Singh, and Th. Voigtmann, Phys. Rev. E 61, 6934 (2000).
49. S. H. Chong and F. Hirata, Phys. Rev. E 58, 6188 (1998).
50. This notation is used to distinguish the molecular approach from the site-site description.
51. R. Schilling and T. Scheidsteger, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2932 (1997)
52. T. Scheidsteger and R. Schilling, Philos. Mag. B 77, 305 (1998).
53. L. Fabbian, A. Latz, R. Schilling, F. Sciortino, P. Tartaglia, and C. Theis, Phys. Rev. E 60, 5768 (1999).
54. K. Kawasaki, Physica A 243, 25 (1997).
55. A. Latz, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 235-237, 128 (1998).
56. M. Letz, R. Schilling, and A. Latz, e-print cond-mat/9906336.
57. L. Fabbian, A. Latz, R. Schilling, F. Sciortino, P. Tartaglia, and C. Theis, Phys. Rev. E (to be published)
58. L. FabbianA. LatzR. SchillingF. SciortinoP. TartagliaC. Theise-print cond-mat/9812363, 1998 (unpublished).
59. C. Theis, F. Sciortino, A. Latz, R. Schilling, and P. Tartaglia, Phys. Rev. E (to be published)
60. C. TheisF. SciortinoA. LatzR. SchillingP. Tartagliae-print cond-mat/0003508.
61. J. Ram and Y. Singh, Phys. Rev. A 44, 3718 (1991).
62. J. Ram, R. C. Singh, and Y. Singh, Phys. Rev. E 49, 5117 (1994).
63. M. Letz and A. Latz, Phys. Rev. E 60, 5865 (1999).
64. S. Kämmerer, W. Kob, and R. Schilling, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2131 (1998).
65. S. Kämmerer, W. Kob, and R. Schilling, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2141 (1998).
66. C. Theis and R. Schilling, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 235-237, 106 (1998).
67. C. G. Gray and K. E. Gubbins, Theory of Molecular Fluids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984), Vol. 1.
68. C. Theis (private communication).
69. Note that our definition of the stability matrix differs by a similarity transformation (Formula presented) from the one in 6.
70. W. Götze, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 56, 139 (1984).
71. W. Götze, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 60, 195 (1985).
72. T. Franosch, M. Fuchs, W. Götze, M. R. Mayr, and A. P. Singh, Phys. Rev. E 55, 7153 (1997).
73. J.-L. Barrat, W. Götze, and A. Latz, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1, 7163 (1989).
74. W. van Megen and S. M. Underwood, Phys. Rev. E 47, 248 (1993).
75. J.-L. Barrat and A. Latz, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 4289 (1990).
76. Note that our definition of (Formula presented) differs from the one used in 6 analogous to 61.