Cognition, computers, and synthetic science: Building knowledge and meaning through modeling

Review of Research in Education

Volumn 25, Issue , 2000, Pages 1-35

  Penner, David E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034488394     PISSN: 0091732X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0091732x025001001     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Abelson, H., & diSessa, A. A. (1980). Turtle geometry: The computer as a medium for exploring mathematics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Adams, S., & diSessa, A. A. (1991). Learning by cheating: Children's inventive use of a Boxer microworld. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 79-89.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Balacheff, N., & Kaput, J. J. (1997). Computer-based learning environments in mathematics. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 469-501). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
5. Bellamy, R. K. E. (1996). Designing educational technology: Computer-mediated change. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 123-146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Benson, G. D. (1989). Epistemology and science curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 329-344.
7. Bliss, J., & Ogborn, J. (1989). Tools for exploratory learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 5, 37-50.
8. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
9. Bruner, J., & Haste, H. (1987). Making sense: The child's construction of the world. London: Methuen.
10. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Carey, S. (1988). Reorganization of knowledge in the course of acquisition. In S. Strauss (Ed.), Ontogeny, phylogeny, and historical development (pp. 1-27). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 257-291). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Carey, S. (1992). The origin and evolution of everyday concepts. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. XV, pp. 89-128). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). 'An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': A study of Grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514-529.
15. Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1995). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, & M. S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school (pp. 39-55). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., & Gunstone, R. F. (1982). Educational Psychologist, 17, 31-53.
17. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. XV, pp. 129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
19. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43.
20. Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 66-71.
21. Clement, J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Running, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 341-381). New York: Plenum.
22. Costanza, R. (1987). Simulation modeling on the Macintosh using STELLA. BioScience, 37, 129-132.
23. Crawford, K. (1995). Designing, exploring and interacting: Novice activities in the Boxer computational medium. In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and exploratory learning (pp. 443-462). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
24. Davydov, V. V., & Markova, A. K. (1983). A concept of educational activity for schoolchildren. Soviet Psychology, 21, 50-76.
25. De Jong, T., & Njoo, M. (1992). Learning and instruction with computer simulations: Learning processes involved. In E. de Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 411-428). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
26. De Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-201.
27. Deneubourg, J. L., Aron, S., Goss, S., Pasteels, J. M., & Duerinck, G. (1986). Random behavior, amplification processes, and the number of participants: How they contribute to the foraging properties of ants. Physica D, 22, 176-186.
28. diSessa, A. A. (1987). Artificial worlds and real experience. In R. W. Lawler & M. Yazdani (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and education, Vol. 1: Learning environments and tutoring systems (pp. 55-77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29. diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. B. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. diSessa, A. A. (1990). Social niches for future software. In M. Gardner, J. G. Greeno, F. Reif, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. A. diSessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 301-322). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. diSessa, A. A. (1992). Images of learning. In E. de Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 19-40). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
32. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-125.
33. diSessa, A. A. (1995a). The many faces of a computational medium: Teaching the mathematics of motion. In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and exploratory learning (pp. 337-359). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
34. diSessa, A. A. (1995b). Thematic chapter: Epistemology and systems design. In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and exploratory learning (pp. 15-29). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
35. diSessa, A. A., & Abelson, H. (1986). Boxer: A reconstructable computational medium. Communications of the ACM, 29, 859-868.
36. diSessa, A. A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Metarepresentational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117-160.
37. diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1155-1191.
38. Doerr, H. M. (1996). Integrating the study of trigonometry, vectors, and force through modeling. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 407-418.
39. Doran, J., & Gilbert, N. (1994). Simulating societies: An introduction. In N. Gilbert & J. Doran (Eds.), Simulating societies: The computer simulation of social phenomena (pp. 1-18). London: UCL Press.
40. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.
41. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
42. Eisenberg, M. (1995). Creating software applications for children: Some thoughts. In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and exploratory learning (pp. 175-196). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
43. Emmeche, C. (1994). The garden in the machine: The emerging science of artificial life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Frederiksen, J., & White, B. (1992). Mental models and understanding: A problem for science education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 211-226). New York: Springer-Verlag.
46. Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Giere, R. N. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Gorbunov, A. L. (1994). System concepts for children via LEGO® TC Logo. The Computing Teacher, 22, 21-22.
49. Gregg, L. W., & Simon, H. A. (1967). Process models and stochastic theories of simple concept formation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 246-276.
50. Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 151-183.
51. Hammer, D. (1995). Epistemological considerations in teaching introductory physics. Science Education, 79, 393-413.
52. Hestenes, D. (1992). Modeling games in the Newtonian world. American Journal of Physics, 60, 440-454.
53. Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. A. G. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1-13.
54. Hogg, D. W., Martin, F., & Resnick, M. (1991). Braitenberg creatures. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
55. Holland, J. H. (1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. Reading, MA: Helix Books.
56. Hoyles D. (1995). Thematic chapter: Exploratory software, exploratory cultures? In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and exploratory learning (pp. 199-219). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
57. Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. London: Calder & Boyars.
58. Jackson, S., Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1996). Making dynamic modeling accessible to pre-college science students. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 233-257.
59. Jungck, J. R. (1991). Constructivism, computer explorations, and collaborative learning. Teaching Education, 3, 151-170.
60. Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Introduction. In Y. B. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice (pp. 1-8). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., rev.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Kynigos, C. (1995). Programming as a means of expressing and exploring ideas: Three case studies situated in a directive educational system. In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and exploratory learning (pp. 399-419). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
64. Lafer, S., & Markert, A. (1994). Authentic learning situations and the potential of LEGO® TC Logo. Computers in the Schools, 11, 79-94.
65. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. Lave, J. (1990) Views of the classroom: Implications for math and science learning research. In M. Gardner, J. G. Greeno, F. Reif, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. A. diSessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 251-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
69. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70. Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.
71. Linn, M. C. (1990). Summary: Establishing a science and engineering of science education. In M. Gardner, J. G. Greeno, F. Reif, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. A. diSessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 323-341). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
72. Linn, M. C., diSessa, A., Pea, R., & Songer, N. B. (1994). Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3, 7-15.
73. Lotka, A. J. (1925). Elements of physical biology. New York: Dover.
74. Mandinach, E. B. (1989). Model-building and the use of computer simulation of dynamic systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 221-243.
75. Mason, J. (1995). Exploring the sketch metaphor for presenting mathematics with Boxer. In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and exploratory learning (pp. 383-398). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
76. Mataric, M. J. (1993). Designing emergent behaviors: From local interactions to collective intelligence. In J. A. Meyer, H. L. Raitblat, & S. W. Wilson (Eds.), From animals to animals 2 (pp. 432-441). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. Resnick & L. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum (pp. 133-149). Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
78. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Activity theory and human-computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 7-16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York: Cambridge University Press.
80. Niedderer, H., Schecker, H., & Bethge, R. (1991). The role of computer-aided modelling in learning physics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 84-95.
81. Orhun, E. (1995). Design of computer-based cognitive tools. In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and exploratory learning (pp. 305-319). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
82. Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1980). The uses of models in science teaching. School Science Review, 62, 57-67.
83. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
84. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
85. Penner, D. E. (in press). Complexity, emergence, and synthetic models in science education. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from professional, instructional, and everyday science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
86. Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1-20.
87. Penner, D. E., & Klahr, D. (1996). The interaction of domain-specific knowledge and domain-general discovery strategies: A study with sinking objects. Child Development, 67, 2709 -2727.
88. Ploger, D. (1991a). Knowledge representation in Boxer: Learning about the genetic code via programming. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 55-71.
89. Ploger, D. (1991b). Reasoning and learning about mechanisms in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 25, 53-60.
90. Ploger, D., & Lay, E. (1992). The structure of programs and molecules. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 347-364.
91. Popper, K. R. (1962). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
92. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
93. Raghavan, K., & Glaser, R. (1995). Model-based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum. Science Education, 79, 37-61.
94. Ray, T. S. (1995). An evolutionary approach to synthetic biology: Zen and the art of creating life. In C. G. Langton (Ed.), Artificial life: An overview (pp. 179-209). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95. Resnick, M. (1993). Behavior construction kits. Communications of the ACM, 36, 65-71.
96. Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97. Resnick, M. (1995). New paradigms for computing, new paradigms for thinking. In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and exploratory learning (pp. 31-43). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
98. Resnick, M. (1996a). Beyond the centralized Mindset. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 1-22.
99. Resnick, M. (1996b). Toward a practice of constructional design. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 161-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
100. Resnick, M., & Ocko, S. (1991). LEGO®/Logo: Learning through and about design. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 141-150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
101. Resnick, M., & Wilensky, U. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 3-19.
102. Salomon, G. (1992). Effects with and of computers and the study of computer-based learning. In E. de Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 249-264). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
103. Sargent, R., Resnick, M., Martin, F., & Silverman, B. (1996). Building and learning with programmable bricks. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice (pp. 161-173). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
104. Schauble, L. (1996). The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Developmental Psychology, 32, 102-119.
105. Schecker, H. (1993). Learning physics by making models. Physics Education, 28, 102-106.
106. Schoenfeld, A. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7, 329-363.
107. Schoenfeld, A., Smith, J. P., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 55-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
108. Schwartz, J. L. (1995). Shuttling between the particular and the general: Reflections on the role of conjecture and hypothesis in the generation of knowledge in science and mathematics. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, & M. S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school (pp. 93-105). New York: Oxford University Press.
109. Scribner, S. (1985). Knowledge at work. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16, 199-206.
110. SimCity [Computer software]. (1989). Orinda, CA: Maxis.
111. Simon, H. A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
112. Slotta, J. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (1996). Understanding constraint-based processes: A precursor to conceptual change in physics. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 306-311). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
113. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 115-163.
114. Sober, E. (1991). Learning from functionalism: Prospects for strong artificial life. In C. G. Langton, C. Taylor, J. D. Farmer, & S. Rasmussen (Eds.), Artificial life II (pp. 749-765). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
115. Soloway, E. (1993). Should We teach students to program? Communications of the ACM, 36, 859-868.
116. Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 761-784.
117. Steed, M. (1992). Stella, a simulation construction kit: Cognitive process and educational implications. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 11, 39-52.
118. Steels, L. (1995). Building agents out of autonomous behavior systems. In L. Steels & R. Brooks (Eds.), The artificial life route to artificial intelligence: Building embodied situated agents (pp. 83-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
119. Stewart, J., Hafner, R., Johnson, S., & Finkel, E. (1992). Science as model building: Computers and high-school genetics. Educational Psychologist, 27, 317-336.
120. Stratford, S. J. (1997). A review of computer-based model research in precollege science classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 3-23.
121. Stratford, S. J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997, March). Secondary students' dynamic modeling processes: Analyzing, reasoning about, synthesizing, and testing models of stream ecosystems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
122. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
123. Tinker, R. F., & Thornton, R. K. (1992). Constructing student knowledge in science. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 153-170). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
124. Volterra, V. (1926). Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature, 188, 558-560.
125. Vosniadou, S. (1992). Fostering conceptual change: The role of computer-based environments. In E. de Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 149-162). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
126. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
127. Webb, M. (1993). Computer-based modelling in school science. School Science Review, 74, 33-46.
128. White, B. Y. (1993a). Intermediate causal models: A missing link for successful science education? In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 177-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
129. White, B. Y. (1993b). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 1-100.
130. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118.
131. Wilensky, U. (1996). Modeling rugby: Kick first, generalize later? International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1, 125-131.
132. Wiser, M., & Carey, S. (1983). When heat and temperature were one. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 267-297). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.