Balanced Scorecard als Bemessungsgrundlage finanzieller Anreizsysteme -Eine theorie- und empiriegeleitete Analyse der resultierenden Grundprobleme

Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis

Volumn 2000, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 36-55

  Pfaff, Dieter ^a   Kunz, Alexis ^a   Pfeiffer, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034423099     PISSN: 03405370     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abernethey, M. A. / Lillis, A. M. (1995): The Impact of Manufacturing Flexibility on Management Control System Design, in: Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 20, S. 241-258.
2. Andersen, E. / Fornell, C. / Lehmann, D. (1994): Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 (July), S. 53-66.
3. Auer-Rizzi, W. (1998): Entscheidungsprozesse in Gruppen - Kognitive und soziale Verzerrungstendenzen, Wiesbaden.
4. Baiman, S. / Evans, J. H. (1983): Pre-Decision Information and Participative Management Control Systems, in: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 21, S. 371-395.
5. Baiman, S. / Sivaramakrishnan, K. (1991): The Value of Private Pre-Decision Information in a Principal-Agent Context, in: The Accounting Review, Vol. 66, S. 747-766.
6. Baiman, S. / Rajan, M. V. (1995): The Informational Advantages of Discretionary Bonus Schemes, in: The Accounting Review, Vol. 70, S. 557-579.
7. Baker, G. / Gibbons, R. / Murphy, J. (1994): Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, S. 1125-1156.
8. Banker, R. / Potter, G. / Srinivasan, D. (1998): An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan Based on Nonfinancial Performance Measures, Working Paper of the Universities of Texas, Cornell and Pittsburgh.
9. Bommer, W. H. / Johnson, J. L. / Rich, G. A. / Podsakoff, P. M. / MacKenzie, S. B. (1995): On the Interchangeability of Objective and Subjective Measures of Employee Performance: A Meta-Analysis, in: Personnel Psychology, Vol. 48, S. 587-605.
10. Brancato, C. K. (1995): New Performance Measures - A Research Report, No. 1118-95, New York.
11. Bushman, R. M. / Indejejikan, R. J. / Smith, A. (1996): CEO Compensation: The Role of Individual Performance Evaluation, in: Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 21, S. 161-193.
12. Daniel, S. / Reitsperger, W. (1991a): Linking Quality Strategy with Management Control Systems: Empirical Evidence from Japanese Industry, in: Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 16, S. 601-618.
13. Daniel, S. / Reitsperger, W. (1991b): Management Control Systems for JIT: An Empirical Comparison of Japan and the U.S., in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 22, S. 603-617.
14. Erlei, M. / Leschke, M. / Sauerland, D. (1999): Neue Institutionenökonomik, Stuttgart.
15. Feltham, G. / Xie, J. (1994): Performance Measure Congruity and Diversity in Multi-Task Principal/Agent Relations, in: The Accounting Review, Vol. 69, S. 429-453.
16. Foster, G. / Gupta, M. (1997): The Customer Profitability Implications of Customer Satisfaction, Working Paper of the Universities of Stanford and Washington.
17. Gibbons, R. (1998): Incentives in Organizations, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, S. 115-132.
18. Govindarajan, V. / Fisher, J. (1990): Strategy, Control Systems, and Resource Sharing: Effects on Business Unit Performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, S. 259-285.
19. Govindarajan, V. / Gupta, A. (1985): Linking Control Systems to Business Unit Strategy: Impact on Performance, in: Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 10, S. 51-66.
20. Hart, O. D. / Holmström, B. (1987): The Theory of Contracts, in: Bewley, T. (Hrsg.): Advances in Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress, Cambridge, S. 71-155.
21. Hauser, J. R. / Simester, D. / Wernerfelt, B. (1994): Customer Satisfaction Incentives, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 13 (Fall), S. 327-350.
22. Hemmer, T. (1996): On the Design and Choice of "Modern" Management Accounting Measures, in: Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8 (Fall), S. 87-116.
23. Holmström, B. (1979): Moral Hazard and Observability, in: Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, S. 74-91.
24. Holmström, B. / Milgrom, P. (1991): Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design, in: The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 7, S. 24-52.
25. Hopkins, P. (1996): The Effect of Financial Statement Classification of Hybrid Financial Instruments on Financial Analysts' Stock Price Judgements, in: Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement), Vol. 34, S. 33-50.
26. Horváth, P. (1999): Richtig verstanden ist Balanced Scorecard das künftige Management-system, in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 30. August, Nr. 200, S. 29.
27. Ittner, C. D. / Larcker, D. F. (1995): Total Quality Management and the Choice of Information and Reward Systems, in: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 33 (Supplement), S. 1-34.
28. Ittner, C. D. / Larcker, D. F. (1997): Quality Strategy, Strategic Control Systems, and Organizational Performance, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 22, S. 293-314.
29. Ittner, C. D. / Larcker, D. F. (1998a): Are Nonfinancial Measures Leading Indicators of Financial Performance? An Analysis of Customer Satisfaction, in: Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 36 (Supplement), S. 1-35.
30. Ittner, C. D. / Larcker, D. F. (1998b): Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications, in: Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, S. 205-238.
31. Ittner, C. D. / Larcker, D. F. / Meyer, M. W. (1997): Performance, Compensation, and the Balanced Scorecard, Working Paper of the Wharton School.
32. Ittner, C. D. / Larcker, D. F. / Rajan, M. V. (1997): The Choice of Performance Measures in Annual Bonus Contracts, in: The Accounting Review, Vol. 72, S. 231-255.
33. Janis, I. L. (1982): Groupthinking, Boston etc.
34. Kaplan, R. S. / Norton, D. P. (1992): The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70, No. 1, S. 71-79.
35. Kaplan, R. S. / Norton, D. P. (1996): The Balanced Scorecard, Boston.
36. Kerr, S. (1975): On the Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 18, S. 769-783.
37. Kida, T. / Smith, J. F. (1995): The Encoding and Retrieval of Numerical Data for Decision Making in Accounting Contexts: Model Development, in: Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 20, S. 585-610.
38. Kurtzman, J. (1997): Is your Company off Course? Now you can find out why, in: Fortune, Vol. 135 (February 17), S. 58-60.
39. Lazear, E. (1996): Performance, Pay, and Productivity, NBER Working Paper 5672.
40. Lipe, M. G. / Salterio, S. (1999): The Balanced Scorecard: Judgement Effects of Information Organization and Diversity, Working Paper of the University of Waterloo.
41. McAdams, J. L. / Hawk, E. J. (1994): Organizational Performance & Rewards: 663 Experiences in Making the Link, New York.
42. Miles, R. / Snow, C. (1978): Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, New York.
43. Milgrom, P. / Roberts, J. (1992): Economics, Organization, and Management, Englewood Cliffs.
44. O. V. (1998): Gentia Software White Paper, o. O.
45. Pascale, R. T. (1988): The Paradox of Corporate Culture - Reconceiling Ourselves to Socialization, in: Katz, R. (Hrsg.): Managing Professionals in Innovative Organizations - A Collection of Readings, Cambridge, S. 343-354.
46. Perera, S. / Harrison, G. / Poole, M. (1997): Customer-Focused Manufacturing Strategy and the Use of Operations-Based Non-Financial Performance Measures: A Research Note, in: Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 22, S. 557-572.
47. Porter, M. (1980): Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York.
48. Prendergast, C. (1999): The Provision of Incentives in Firms, in: Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 17, S. 7-63.
49. Prendergast, C. / Topel, R. (1993): Discretion and Bias in Performance Evaluation, in: European Economic Review, Vol. 37, S. 355-365.
50. Prendergast, C. / Topel, R. (1996): Favoritism in Organizations, in: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 104, S. 958-978.
51. Schick, A. / Gordon, L. / Haka, S. (1990): Information Overload: A Temporal Approach, in: Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 15, S. 199-220.
52. Schiff, A. D. / Hoffmann, L. R. (1996): An Exploration of the Use of Financial and Nonfinancial Measures of Performance in a Service Organization, in: Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 8, S. 134-153.
53. Singlefon-Greene, B. (1993): If it Matters, Measure it, in: Accountancy, Vol. 111 (May), S. 52-53.
54. Spremann, K. (1987): Agent and Principal, in: Bamberg, G. / Spremann, K. (Hrsg.): Agency Theory, Information, and Incentives, Berlin etc., S. 3-37.
55. Symons, R. T. / Jacobs, R.A. (1995): A Total Quality Management-Based Incentive System Supporting Total Quality Management Implementation, in: Production and Operations Management, Vol. 4, S. 228-241.
56. Towers Perrin (1996): Inside "the Balanced Scorecard", in: Compuscan Report, January, S. 1-5.
57. Wagenhofer, A. (1996): Anreizsysteme in Agency-Modellen mit mehreren Aktionen, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, 56. Jg., S. 155-165.
58. Wagenhofer, A. (1999): Anreizkompatible Gestaltung des Rechnungswesens, in: Bühler, W. / Siegert, T. (Hrsg.): Unternehmenssteuerung und Anreizsysteme, Stuttgart, S. 183-205.
59. Weber, J. / Schäller, U. (1998): Balanced Scorecard - Gedanken zur Einordnung des Konzepts in das bisherige Controlling-Instrumentarium, in: Zeitschrift für Planung, 9. Jg., S. 341-365.
60. Young, S. M. / Selto, F. H. (1993): Explaining Cross-Sectional Workgroup Performance Differences in a JIT Facility: A Critical Appraisal of a Field-Based Study, in: Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5 (Fall), S. 300-326.