Larval budding, metamorphosis, and the evolution of life-history patterns in echinoderms

Invertebrate Biology

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 234-241

  Lacalli, Thurston C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASTERIAS; ASTEROIDEA; ECHINODERMATA; ECHINOIDEA; HOLOTHUROIDEA; OPHIUROIDEA;

EID: 0034421699     PISSN: 10778306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2000.tb00010.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Balser EJ 1998. Cloning by ophiuroid echinoderm larvae. Biol. Bull. 194: 187-193.
2. Bosch I, Rivkin RB, & Alexander SP 1989. Asexual reproduction by oceanic planktotrophic larvae. Nature 337: 169-170.
3. Burdon-Jones C 1957. Hemichordata: Enteropneusta. Fich. Ident. Zoopl. 70: 1-6.
4. Burke RD 1989. Echinoderm metamorphosis: comparative aspects of the change in form. In: Echinoderm Studies, Vol 3. Jangoux M & Lawrence JM, eds., pp. 81-108. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
5. Bury H 1895. The metamorphosis of echinoderms. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 38: 45-135.
6. Chia FS & Burke RD 1978. Echinoderm metamorphosis: fate of the larval structures. In: Settlement and Metamorphosis of Marine Invertebrate Larvae. Chia FS & Rice ME, eds., pp. 219-234. Elsevier, New York.
7. Conway Morris S 1989. Burgess Shale faunas and the Cambrian explosion. Science 246: 339-346.
8. _ 1993. The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa. Nature 361: 219-225.
9. Dan-Sohkawa M, Yamanaka H, & Watanabe K 1986. Reconstruction of bipinnaria larvae from dissociated embryonic cells of the starfish, Asterina pectinifera. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 94: 47-60.
10. Dawydoff C 1948a. Embryologie des Échinodermes. In: Traité de Zoologie, Vol 11. Grassé P-P, ed., pp. 277-363. Masson & Cie, Paris.
11. _ 1948b. Classe des Entéropneustes. In: Traité de Zoologie, Vol 11. Grassé P-P, ed., pp. 369-453. Masson & Cie, Paris.
12. Fell HB 1948. Echinoderm embryology and the origin of chordates. Biol. Rev. 23: 81-107.
13. Freeman G 1988. The factors that promote the development of symmetry properties in aggregates from dissociated echinoid embryos. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 197: 394-405.
14. Gemmill JF 1914. The development and certain points in the adult structure of the starfish Asterias rubens. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B205: 213-294.
15. Grave C 1903. On the occurrence among echinoderms of larvae with cilia arranged in transverse rings, with a suggestion on their significance. Biol. Bull. 5: 169-186.
16. Guidice G & Mutolo V 1970. Reaggregation of dissociated cells of sea urchin embryos. Adv. Morphogen. 8: 115-158.
17. Hörstadius S 1928. Über die Determination des Keimes bei Echinodermen. Acta Zool. 9: 1-191.
18. _ 1973. Experimental Embryology of Echinoderms. Oxford University Press, London. 192 pp.
19. Jaeckle WB 1994. Multiple modes of asexual reproduction by tropical and subtropical sea star larvae: an unusual adaptation for genet dispersal and survival. Biol. Bull. 186: 62-71.
20. Janies DA & McEdward LR 1993. Highly derived coelomic and water-vascular morphogenesis in a starfish with pelagic direct development. Biol. Bull. 185: 56-76.
21. Jefferies RPS, Brown NA, & Daley PEJ 1996. The early phylogeny of chordates and echinoderms and the origin of chordate left-right asymmetry and bilateral symmetry. Acta Zool. 77: 101-122.
22. Lacalli TC 1993. Ciliary bands in echinoderm larvae: evidence for structural homologies and a common plan. Acta Zool. 74: 127-133.
23. _ 1996. Mesodermal pattern and pattern repeats in the starfish bipinnaria larva, and related patterns in other deuterostome larvae and chordates. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B351: 1737-1758.
24. _ 1997. The nature and origin of deuterostomes: some unresolved issues. Invertebr. Biol. 116: 363-370.
25. Lacalli TC & West JE 1987. Ciliary band formation in the doliolaria larva of Florometra II. Development of anterior and posterior half-embryos and the role of the mesentoderm. Development 99: 273-284.
26. _ 2000. The auricularia-to-doliolaria transformation in two aspidochirote holothurians, Holothuria mexicana and Stichopus californicus. Invertebr. Biol., in press.
27. Littlewood DTJ, Smith AB, Clough KA, & Emson RH 1997. The interrelationships of the echinoderm classes: morphological and molecular evidence. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61: 409-437.
28. Mortensen T 1921. Studies of the Development and Larval Form of Echinoderms. GEC Gad, Copenhagen. 266 pp.
29. _ 1931. Contributions to the study of the development and larval forms of echinoderms I-II. Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. Lett. Dan., Sec. Sci. (Ser 9) 4(1): 1-39.
30. _ 1937. Contributions to the study of the development and larval forms of echinoderms III. Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. Lett. Dan., Sec. Sci. (Ser. 9) 7(1): 1-65.
31. _ 1938. Contributions to the study of the development and larval forms of echinoderms IV. Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. Lett. Dan., Sec. Sci. (Ser. 9) 7(3): 1-59.
32. Müller J 1853. Ueber den allgemeinen Plan in der Entwicklung der Echinodermen. Kon. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, pp. 1-41.
33. Nielsen C 1995. Animal Evolution, Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford. 467 pp.
34. _ 1998. Origin and evolution of animal life cycles. Biol. Rev. 73: 125-155.
35. Pearse JS & Cameron RA 1991. Echinodermata: Echinoidea. Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, Vol 6. Giese AC, Pearse JS, & Pearse VB, eds., pp. 513-662. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove.
36. Rieger RM 1994. The biphasic life cycle - a central theme of metazoan evolution. Amer. Zool. 34: 484-491.
37. Runnström J 1917.Analytische Studien über die Seeigelenwicklung III. Arch. f. Entwicklungsmech. der Org. 43: 223-328.
38. Signor PW & Vermeij G 1994. The plankton and the benthos: origins and early history of an evolving relationship. Paleobiology 20: 297-319.
39. Smiley S 1986. Metamorphosis of Stichopus californicus and its phylogenetic implications. Biol. Bull. 171: 611-631.
40. Sprinkle J 1992. Radiation of Echinodermata. In: Origin and Early Evolution of the Metazoa. Lipp JH & Signor PW, eds., pp. 375-398. Plenum, New York.
41. Strathmann RR 1988. Larvae, phylogeny, and von Baer's law. In: Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology. Paul CRC & Smith AB, eds., pp. 53-68. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
42. Strathmann RR & Eernisse DJ 1994. What molecular phylogenies tell us about the evolution of larval forms. Amer. Zool. 34: 502-512.
43. Sumrall CD & Sprinkle J 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of living Echinodermata based on primitive fossil taxa. In: Echinoderms: San Francisco, Proc. 9th Internatl. Echinoderm Conference. Mooi R & Telford M, eds., pp. 81-87. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam.
44. Vermeij GJ 1990. The origin of skeletons. Palaios 4: 585-589.
45. Vickery MS & McClintock JB 1998. Regeneration in metazoan larvae. Nature 394: 140.
46. Wada H & Satoh N 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among extant classes of echinoderms, as inferred from sequences of 18S rDNA, coincide with relationships deduced from the fossil record. J. Mol. Evol. 38: 41-49.
47. Winsor MP 1976. Starfish, Jellyfish, and the Order of Life. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven. 228 pp.
48. Yamanaka H, Tanaka-Ohmura Y, & Dan-Sohkawa M 1986. What do dissociated embryonic cells of the starfish, Asterina pectinifera, do to reconstruct bipinnaria larvae? J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 94: 61-71.