Reading and listening to oral-based versus literate-based discourse

Communication Education

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 121-133

  Rubin, Donald L ^a   Hafer, Teresa ^a,b   Arata, Kevin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b Middle school teacher for Florence   (Italy)

^c UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comprehension; Listenability; Listening; Orality; Reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034411772     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520009379200     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Armbruster, B. (1984). The problem of "inconsiderate text." In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction (pp. 202-217). New York: Longman.
2. Berger, C. R. (1989). Goals, plans, and discourse comprehension. In J. J. Bradac (Ed.), Message effects in communication science (pp. 75-101). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Biber, D. (1988). Variation between speech and writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Biber, D. (1992). On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, 15, 133-163.
5. Bostrom, R., & Waldhart, E. S. (1988). Memory models and the measurement of listening. Communication Education, 37, 1-13.
6. Bostrom, R. N. (1996). Memory, cognitive processing, and the process of "listening": A reply to Thomas and Levine. Human Communication Research, 23, 298-305.
7. Brandt, D. (1989). The message is the massage: Orality and literacy once more. Written Communication, 6, 31-44.
8. Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nekon-Denny Reading Test manual for scoring and interpretation, Forms G & H. Chicago: Riverside.
9. Charrow, V. R., & Charrow, R. P. (1979). Characteristics of the language of jury instructions. In J. Alatis & G. R. Tucker (Eds.), Language in public life (GURT 79) (pp. 163-185). Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
10. Denbow, C. J. (1975). Listenability and readability: An experimental investigation. Journalism Quarterly, 52, 285-290.
11. Dunkel, P., Henning, G., & Chaudron, C. (1993). The assessment of an L2 listening comprehension construct: A tentative model for test specification and development. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 180-191.
12. Feldt, R. C. (1988). Predicting academic performance: Nelson-Denny Reading Test and measures of college students' study of expository prose. Psychological Reports, 63, 579-582.
13. Flowerdew, J. (1994). Research of relevance to second language lecture comprehension-an overview. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 7-30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Gee, J. P. (1989). Orality and literacy: From "The Savage Mind" to "Ways with Words." Journal of Education, 171, 39-60.
15. Goelman, H. (1982). Selective attention in language comprehension: Children's processing of expository and narrative discourse. Discourse Processes, 5, 53-72.
16. Goss, B. (1982). Listening as information processing. Communication Quarterly, 30, 304-307.
17. Graves, M. F., Slater, W. H., Roen, D., Redd-Boyd, T., Duin, A., Furniss, D., & Hazeltine, P. (1988). Some characteristics of memorable expository writing: Effects of revisions by writers with different backgrounds. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 242-265.
18. Green, D. R., & Tomlinson, M. (1983). The cloze procedure applied to a probability concepts test. Journal of Research in Reading, 6, 103-118.
19. Halliday, M. A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 55-82). San Diego: Academic Press.
20. Hildyard, A., & Olson, D. (1978). Memory and inference in the comprehension of oral and written discourse. Discourse Processes, 1, 91-117.
21. Horning, A. S. (1993). The psycholinguistics of readable writing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Horowitz, R., & Samuels, S. J. (1985). Reading and listening to expository prose. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 185-198.
23. Horowitz, R., & Samuels, S. J. (1987). Reading and listening to expository text Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 185-198.
24. Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1983). Generalizing about messages: Suggestions for design and analysis of experiments. Human Communication Research, 9, 169-191.
25. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
26. Kintsch, W., & Kozminsky, E. (1977). Summarizing stories after reading and listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 491-499.
27. Meyer, B. J. F., & McConkie, G. W. (1973). What is recalled after hearing a passage? Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 109-117.
28. Millett, S., & Kopp, W. (1996). Technology with a human touch: The top 10 innovative products for 2006. The Futurist, 30(4), 16-20.
29. Mulholland, H., & Neville, M. (1989). Reading and listening at three school stages: Cloze tests and their response analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 12, 29-48.
30. Olesen, D. E. (1995a, Sept. 15). Technology strategies for 2005. Vital Speeches of the Day, 61(17), 534-538.
31. Olesen, D. E. (1995b). The top ten technologies for the next ten years. The Futurist, 29(5), 9-13.
32. Olesen, D. E. (1996). Technology with a human touch: The top 10 innovative products for 2006. (Speech delivered to The Rotary Club of Seattle in Seattle, Washington.)
33. Olson, D. (1986). The cognitive consequences of literacy. Canadian Psychology, 27, 109-121.
34. Olson, D. (1995). Conceptualizing the written word: An intellectual autobiography. Written Communication, 12, 277-297.
35. Ong, W. (1975). The writer's audience is always a fiction. PMLA, 90, 9-21.
36. Ong, W. S. J. (1982). Orality and literacy. London: Methuen.
37. Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1982). Research update: Listening comprehension. Language Arts, 59, 617-629.
38. Rhodes, S. C. (1993). Listening: A relational process. In A. Wolvin & C. Coakley (Eds.), Perspectives on listening (pp. 217-240). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
39. Rosenblatt, L. (1985). The transactional theory of the literary work: Implications for research. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature: Points of departure. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40. Rubin, D. L. (1987). Divergence and convergence between speaking and writing. Topics in Language Disorders, 7(4), 1-18.
41. Rubin, D. L. (1993). Listenability = oral-based discourse + considerateness. In A. D. Wolvin & C. G. Coakley (Eds.), Perspectives on listening (pp. 261-281). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. Rubin, D. L. (1995). Introduction: Composing social identity. In D. Rubin (Ed.), Composing social identity in written language (pp. 1-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Rubin, D. L., Backlund, P. M., & Morreale, S. P. (1996). An introduction to assessing oral communication. In S. P. Morreale & P. M. Backlund (Eds.), Large-Scale assessment of oral communication skills: K-12 and Higher Education (2nd ed.) (pp. 5-20). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
44. Rubin, D. L., Goodram, R., & Hall, B. (1990). Orality, oral-based culture, and the academic writing of ESL learners. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 1, 56-76.
45. Rubin, D. L., & Rafoth, B. A. (1986). Oral language criteria for selecting listenable materials. An update for reading teachers and specialists. Reading Psychology, 7, 137-151.
46. Rubin, R. B., & Roberts, C. (1987). A comparative examination and analysis of three listening tests. Communication Education, 36, 142-153.
47. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 647-658.
48. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Smith, F. (1994). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read (5th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
51. Sparks, J. R., Areni, C. S., & Cox, K. C. (1998). An investigation of the effects of language style and communication modality on persuasion. Communication Monographs, 65, 108-125.
52. Spectra Publishers (1991). Watson-Barker Listening Test video version/facilitator's guide. New Orleans: author.
53. Sticht, T., & James, J. (1984). Listening and reading. Handbook of reading research (pp. 293-317). New York: Longman.
54. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55. Tannen, D. (1985). Relative focus of involvement in oral and written discourse. In D. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning (pp. 124-148) Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press.
56. Thomas, L. T., & Levine, T. R. (1994). Disentangling listening and verbal recall: Related but separate constructs? Human Communication Research, 21, 103-127.
57. Thomas, L. T., & Levine, T. R. (1996). Further thoughts on recall, memory, and the measurement of listening: A rejoinder to Bostrom. Human Communication Research, 23, 306-308.
58. Townsend, D. J., Carithers, C., & Bever, T. (1987). Listening and reading processes in college-and middle school-age readers. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 217-242). San Diego: Academic Press.
59. Trebasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612-630.
60. Watson, K. W., & Barker, L. L. (1984). Listening behavior: Definition and measurement. In R. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 178-197). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61. Watson, K. W., & Barker, L. L. (1988). Listening assessment: Validation of the Watson-Barker Listening Tests. Journal of the International Listening Association, 2, 20-32.
62. Wolvin, A., & Coakley, C. G. (1988). Listening (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm C. Brown.