The Brazilian national evaluation system of basic education: Context, process, and impact

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 105-125

  Crespo, Manuel ^a   Soares, José Francisco ^b   De Mello e Souza, Alberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034409412     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-491X(00)00011-0     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Black, P.J (1994). Performance assessment and accountability: The experience in England and Wales. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16 (2), 191-203.
2. Bock, R.D. (1997). A brief history of the development of item response theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 16 (4), 21-33.
3. Brookover, W., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., Wijenbaker, J. (1979). School Social Systems and Student Achievement: Schools can Make a Difference. New York: Bergin.
4. Brown, M., Mccallu, B., Taggart, R., & Gipps, C. (1997). The validity of national testing at age 11: The teacher's view. Assessment in Education, 4 (2), 271-293.
5. Castro, C., & Fletcher, P. (1993). Mitos, estratégias e prioridades para o ensino de primeiro grau. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, (9), 39-56.
6. Coleman, J.S., Campbell, E.Q., Hobson, C.J., McPartland, J., Mood, A.M., Weinfeld, F.D., & York, R.C. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunities. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
7. Crespo, M. (1980). L'impact de la recherche appliquée en milieu scolaire: Quelques considérations préliminaires. Revue Canadienne de L'éducation, 5 (4), 8-21.
8. Crespo, M. (1997). A Tentative Framework for the Design of a System of Indicators for Impact Evaluation on Educational Programs. Unpublished working paper. Brasilia: United Nations Development Program.
9. Daugherty, R. (1997). National curriculum assessment: The experience of England and Wales. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33 (2), 198-218.
10. De Mello E Souza, A., Crespo, M., & Soares, J.F. (1998). Implementing a World-class Educational Assessment System: An External Appraisal of the SAEB Project. Brasilia: United Nations Development Program.
11. Eckstein, M.A. ( 1996). A comparative assessment of assessment. Assessment in Education, 3 (2), 232-240.
12. Edmonds, R.R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37 (1), 15-18.
13. Edmonds, R.R., & Frederiksen, J.R. (1978). Search for Effective Schools: The Identification of City Schools that are Instructionally Effective for Poor Children. Cambridge: Harvard University, Center for Urban Studies.
14. Fletcher, P., & Ribeiro, S.C. (1987). O ensino de primeiro grau no Brasil hoje. Em Aberto, (Vol. 6). Institute Nacional de Pesquisas Educaciones (INEP).
15. Fuller, B., Dellagnelo, A., Strath, A., Santana, E., Bastos, B., Maia, M.H., Lopes De Matos, K.S., Portela, A.L., & Vieira, S.L. (1999). How to raise children's early literacy? The influence of family, teacher and classroom in Northeast Brazil. Comparative Education Review, 43 (1), 1-35.
16. Hambleton, R.K., Slater, R.K., & Sharon, C. (1996). Are NAEP Executive Summary Reports Understandable to Policy Makers and Educators? (No. 4000296). Silver Springs, MD: Association for Information and Image Management.
17. Johnson, E.G. (1992). The designs of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 95-110.
18. Klein, R., & Fontanive, N.S. (1995). Avaliação em larga escala: Uma proposta inovadora. Em Aberto, 66, 29-35.
19. Klein, R., & Ribeiro, S.C. (1991). O censo educacional e o modelo de fluxo: O problema da repetência. Revista Brasileira de Estatística, 52, 5-45.
20. Linn, R., & Dunbar, J.R. (1992). Issues in the design and reporting of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29 (2), 177-194.
21. Longford, N.T. (1995). Models for Uncertainty in Educational Testing (pp. 159-164). New York: Springer Verlag.
22. Maluf, M.M.B. (1996). O sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Básica no Brasil: Análise e proposições. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, (14), 5-38.
23. Martin-Kniep, G.O., Thornburg, D.G., & Cookson, P.W. (1994). Introduction to the special issue of politics of assessment: Local, state and national perspectives. Educational Policy, 8 (2), 107-110.
24. MEC/SEDIAE/INEP (1996). Resultados no SAEB/95. Resultados do SAEB/95 - Escalas de Proficiência. Brasilia: Author.
25. Montmarquette, C., Houle, R., Crespo, M., & Mashseredjian, S. (1987). The impact of elementary school related factors on the achievement of French Canadian children. Canadian Review of Education, 12 (1), 115-136.
26. Oliveira, J.B.A. (1995). O futuro do SEB e a consolidação de políticas públicas. Em Aberto, (Vol. 66). Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Educaciones (INEP).
27. Ribeiro, S.C. (1991). A pedagogia da repetência. Estudos Avançados, 5 (12), 7-21.
28. Rutter. M., Maughan, E., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and their Effects on Children. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
29. Sammons, P., Thomas, S., Mortimore, P. (1997). Forging Links: Effective Schools and Effective Departments. London: Paul Chapman.
30. Silvernail, D.L. (1996). The impact of England's National Curriculum and Assessment System on classroom practice: Potential lessons for American reformers. Educational Policy, 10 (1), 46-62.
31. Wainer, H. (1995). A study of display methods for NAEP results: I. Tables. Research Rep. No. 95-1. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.