Regulating migration: Authority delegation in justice and home affairs

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 80-103

  Stetter, Stephan ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amsterdam Treaty; European Union; International prisoners dilemma; Migration policies; Principal agent theory; Regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034406380     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: 14664429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135017600343287     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Alter, Karen J. (1998) ‘Who are the “Masters of the Treaty”?: European governments and the European Court of Justice’, International Organization 52(1): 121–47.
2. Baldwin-Edwards, Martin (1991) ‘Immigration after 1992’, Politics and Policy 19(3): 199–211.
3. Baldwin-Edwards, Martin (1997) ‘The emerging European immigration regime: some reflections on implications for southern Europe’, Journal of Common Market Studies 35(4): 497–519.
4. Baldwin-Edwards, Martin and Schain, Martin A. (1994) ‘The politics of immigration: introduction’, in Martin Baldwin-Edwards and Martin A. Schain (eds), ‘The politics of immigration in western Europe’, West European Politics, special edition, 17(2): 1–16.
5. Barents, René (1997) ‘Some observations on the Treaty of Amsterdam’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4(4): 332–45.
6. Begg, Iain (1996) ‘Introduction: Regulation in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 3(4): 525–35.
7. Bunyan, Tony and Webber, Frances (1995) ‘Coopération intergouvernementale en matière d’immigration et d’asile’, Working Paper, 19, Brussels: Commission des Eglises Auprès des Migrants en Europe.
8. Callovi, Guiseppe (1992) ‘Regulation of immigration in 1993: pieces of the European Community jig-saw puzzle’, International Migration Review 26(2): 353–72.
9. Chalmers, Damian (1998) ‘Bureaucratic Europe: from regulating communities to securitising unions’. Paper delivered at CES conference, Baltimore, 28 February, unpublished.
10. Christiansen, Thomas (1996) ‘A maturing bureaucracy? The role of the Commission in the policy process’, in Jeremy Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and Policy-Making, London/New York: Routledge, pp. 77–95.
11. Convey, Andrew and Kupiszewski, Marek (1995) ‘Keeping up with Schengen: migration and policy in the European Union’, International Migration Review 29(4): 939–63.
12. Council of the European Communities (1985) ‘Council Resolution on guidelines for a Community policy on migration’, Official Journal of the European Communities 28, C 186: 3–5.
13. Council of the European Union (1995) ‘Draft Report of the Council on the Functioning of the Treaty on European Union’, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
14. Court of Justice of the European Communities (1995) ‘Report of the Court of Justice on Certain Aspects of the Application of the Treaty on European Union – Contribution of the Court of First Instance for the Purposes of the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference’, The Proceedings of the Court of Justice and Court of First Instance of the European Communities, 15/95.
15. Crombez, Christopher (1996) ‘Legislative procedures in the European Union’, British Journal of Political Science 26(3): 199–218.
16. de Lobkowicz, Wenceslas (1994) ‘Intergovernmental cooperation in the field of migration – from the Single European Act to Maastricht’, in Joerg Monar and Roger Morgan (eds), The Third Pillar of the European Union: Cooperation in the Fields of Justice and Home Affairs, Brussels: European University Press, pp. 99–122.
17. Dehousse, Renaud (1992) ‘Integration v. regulation? On the dynamics of regulation in the European Community’, Journal of Common Market Studies 30(4): 383–402.
18. Dehousse, Renaud (1998) ‘European institutional architecture after Amsterdam. Parliamentary system or regulatory structure?’, EUI Working Paper RSC No. 98/11, Florence: European University Institute, http://www.iue.it/RSC/WP_Texts/98_11.html.
19. den Boer, Monica (1996) ‘Justice and home affairs’, in Helen Wallace and William Wallace (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 389–409.
20. den Boer, Monica (1997) ‘Justice and home affairs cooperation in the Treaty on European Union: more complexity despite communitarization’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4(3): 310–16.
21. Dodd, Tom et al. (1997) ‘The European Communities (Amendment) Bill. Implementing the Amsterdam Treaty [Bill No. 71]’, Research Paper 97/112, London: House of Commons.
22. Duff, Andrew (ed.) (1997) The Treaty of Amsterdam. Text and Commentary, London: Federal Trust.
23. Dunleavy, Patrick (1997) ‘Explaining the centralization of the European Union: a public choice analysis’, Aussenwirtschaft 52(1/2): 183–212.
24. Earnshaw, David and Judge, David (1996) ‘From co-operation to co-decision: the European Parliament’s path to legislative power’, in Jeremy Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and Policy-Making, London/New York: Routledge, pp. 96–126.
25. Ehlermann, Claus Dieter (1998) Differentiation, Flexibility, Closer Cooperation: The New Provisions of the Amsterdam Treaty, Florence: Robert Schuman Centre, European University Institute.
26. European Commission (1976) ‘Proposal for a Council Directive on the harmonization of laws in the member states to combat illegal immigration and illegal employment’, Official Journal of the European Communities 19, C 277: 2–4.
27. European Commission (1985a) ‘Completing the Internal Market: White Paper from the Commission to the European Council (Milan, 28 and 29 June 1985)’, COM (85) 310 final.
28. European Commission (1985b) ‘Guidelines for a Community Policy on Migration’, COM (85) 48 final.
29. European Commission (1995a) ‘Intergovernmental Conference 1996: Commission Report for the Reflection Group’, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
30. European Commission (1995b) ‘Report on the Functioning of the Treaty on European Union’, SEC(95) 731 final.
31. European Commission (1996) ‘Intergovernmental Conference 1996: Commission Opinion. Reinforcing Political Union and Preparing for Enlargement’, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
32. European Commission (1998): ‘Towards an area of freedom, security and justice’. Unpublished paper.
33. European Parliament (1983) ‘Resolution on the problems of migrant workers’, Official Journal of the European Communities 26, C 342: 139–45.
34. European Parliament (1995) ‘Report on the Functioning of the Treaty on European Union with a View to the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference – Implementation and Development of the Union’, PE 212.450/fin./Part I.A.
35. Fligstein, Neil and Mara-Drita, Iona (1996) ‘How to make a market: reflections on the attempt to create a single market in the European Union’, American Journal of Sociology 102(2): 1–33.
36. Fortescue, John Adrian (1995) ‘First experiences with the implementation of the Third Pillar provisions’, in Roland Bieber and Joerg Monar (eds), Justice and Home Affairs in the European Union: The Development of the Third Pillar, Brussels: European University Press, pp. 19–27.
37. Garrett, Geoffrey and Weingast, Barry R. (1993) ‘Ideas, interests, and institutions: constructing the European Community’s internal market’, in Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (eds), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press, pp. 173–206.
38. Gatsios, Konstantine and Seabright, Paul (1989) ‘Regulation in the European Community’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 5(2): 37–60.
39. Geddes, Andrew (1995) ‘Immigrant and ethnic minorities and the EU’s “democratic deficit”’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33(2): 197–217.
40. Haas, Ernst (1958) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–1957, London: Stevens.
41. Hailbronner, Kay (1998) ‘European immigration and asylum law under the Amsterdam Treaty’, Common Market Law Review 35: 1047–67.
42. Hammar, Tomas (ed.) (1985) European Immigration Policy. A Comparative Study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Handoll, John (1995) Free Movement of Persons in the EU, Chichester/New York: John Wiley & Sons.
44. Heinelt, Hubert (1993) ‘Immigration and the welfare state in Germany’, German Politics 2(1): 78–96.
45. Henson, Penny and Malhan, Nisha (1995) ‘Endeavours to export a migration crisis: policymaking and Europeanisation in the German migration dilemma’, German Politics 4(3): 128–44.
46. Hix, Simon (1995) ‘The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference and the future of the Third Pillar’, CCME Briefing Paper 20, Brussels: Churches Commission for Migrants in Europe.
47. Hix, Simon and Niessen, Jan (1996) ‘Reconsidering European migration policies. The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference and the reform of the Maastricht Treaty’, Brussels: Migration Policy Group et al.
48. Kingdon, John W. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edn, New York: HarperCollins.
49. Klos, Christian (1998) Rahmenbedingungen und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten der europäischen Migrationspolitik, Konstanz: Hartung-Gorre Verlag.
50. Korella, Gina D. and Twomey, Patrick M. (eds) (1993) Towards a European Immigration Policy, Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.
51. Laffan, Brigid (1997) ‘From policy entrepreneur to policy manager: the challenge facing the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(3): 422–38.
52. Leitner, Helga (1997) ‘Reconfiguring the spatiality of power: the construction of a supranational migration framework for the European Union’, Political Geography 16(2): 123–43.
53. McGowan, Francis and Wallace, Helen (1996) ‘Towards a European regulatory state’, Journal of European Public Policy 3(4): 560–76.
54. Majone, Giandomenico (1993) ‘The European Community: an “independent fourth branch of government”?’, EUI Working Paper SPS 93/9, Florence: European University Institute.
55. Majone, Giandomenico (1996a) Regulating Europe, London/New York: Routledge.
56. Majone, Giandomenico (1996b) ‘A European regulatory state’, in Jeremy Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and Policy-Making, London/New York: Routledge, pp. 263–77.
57. Mattli, Walter and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (1998) ‘Revisiting the European Court of Justice’, International Organization 52(1): 177–209.
58. Monar, Joerg (1997) ‘Der Bereich Inneres und Justiz im Prozeß der Integration’, in Rudolf Hrbek (ed.), Die Reform der Europäischen Union. Positionen und Perspektiven anläßlich der Regierungskonferenz, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 241–52.
59. Monar, Joerg and Morgan, Roger (eds) (1994) The Third Pillar of the European Union: Cooperation in the Fields of Justice and Home Affairs, Brussels: European University Press.
60. Moravcsik, Andrew (1991) ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: national interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community’, International Organization 45(1): 19–56.
61. Moravcsik, Andrew (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, London: UCL Press.
62. Moravcsik, Andrew and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso (1998) ‘Keynote article: Federal ideals and constitutional realities in the Treaty of Amsterdam’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36, annual review: 13–38.
63. Morris, Lydia (1997a) ‘A cluster of contradictions: the politics of migration in the European Union’, Sociology 31(2): 241–59.
64. Morris, Lydia (1997b) ‘Globalization, migration and the nation-state: the path to a postnational Europe?’, British Journal of Sociology 48(2): 192–209.
65. Niessen, Jan (1996) ‘Introduction: The European Union’s migration and asylum policies’, in Elspeth Guild (ed.), The Developing Immigration and Asylum Policies of the European Union: Adopted Conventions, Resolutions, Recommendations, Decisions and Conclusions, The Hague/London: Kluwer Law International, pp. 3–63.
66. Niskanen, William A. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago: Aldine.
67. Page, Edward C. and Dimitrakopoulos, Dionyssis (1997) ‘The dynamics of EU growth. A cross-time analysis’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 9(3): 365–87.
68. Philip, Alan Butt (1994) ‘European Union immigration policy: phantom, fantasy or fact?’, in Martin Baldwin-Edwards and Martin A. Schain (eds), ‘The politics of immigration in western Europe’, West European Politics, special edition, 17(2): 168–91.
69. Pollack, Mark A. (1997) ‘Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community’, International Organization 51(1): 99–134.
70. Reflection Group (1995a) ‘Progress Report from the Chairman of the Reflection Group on the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference’, Brussels, 27 September.
71. Reflection Group (1995b) ‘Reflection Group’s Report’, Brussels, 5 December.
72. Sassen, Saskia (1996) ‘The de-facto transnationalizing of immigration policy’, Jean Monnet Chair Papers 35, Florence: The Robert Schuman Centre at the European University Institute.
73. Twomey, Patrick M. (1994) ‘Title VI of the Union Treaty: “matters of common interest” as a question of human rights’, in Joerg Monar and Roger Morgan (eds), The Third Pillar of the European Union: Cooperation in the Fields of Justice and Home Affairs, Brussels: European University Press, pp. 49–66.
74. Ugur, Mehmet (1995) ‘Freedom of movement vs. exclusion: a reinterpretation of the “insider”–“outsider” divide in the European Union’, International Migration Review 29(4): 964–99.
75. Weber-Panariello, Philippe A. (1995) ‘The integration of matters of justice and home affairs into Title VI of the Treaty on European Union: a step towards more democracy?’, EUI Working Paper RSC No. 95/32, Florence: European University Institute.
76. Weiler, Joseph H.H. (1997) ‘The reformation of European constitutionalism’, Journal of Common Market Studies 35(1): 97–131.
77. Wessels, Wolfgang and Rometsch, Dieter (eds) (1996) The European Union and the Member States: Towards Institutional Fusion?, Manchester: Manchester University Press