Topic Scenes in Conversations with Adults with Right-Hemisphere Brain Damage

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 72-86

  Kennedy, Mary R T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conversation; Discourse; Right hemisphere; Stroke; Topics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034387251     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360.0901.72     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barona, A., Reynolds, C. R., & Chastain, R. (1984). A demographically based index of premorbid intelligence for the WAIS-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 885-887.
3. Bedrosian, J. L. (1993). Making minds meet: Assessment of conversational topic in adults with mild to moderate mental retardation. Topics in Language Disorders, 13(3), 36-46.
4. Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Bihrle, A. M., & Gardner, H. (1986). Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 26, 310-321.
5. Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1977). Computational handbook of statistics (pp. 224-227). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
6. Chantraine, Y., Jeanette, Y., & Ska, B. (1998). Conversational abilities in patients with right hemisphere damage. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 21-32.
7. Cherney, L. R., & Canter, G. J. (1993). Informational content in the discourse of patients with probable Alzheimer's disease and patients with right hemisphere damage. Clinical Aphasiology, 21, 123-133.
8. Coelho, C., Liles, B., & Duffy, R. (1991). Analysis of conversational discourse in head-injured adults. Journal of Head Injury Rehabilitation, 6, 92-99.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1985). Interaction structure and strategy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Foldi, N. S. (1987). Appreciation of pragmatic interpretation of indirect commands: Comparison of right and left brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 31, 88-108.
12. Gardner, H., Brownell, H. H., Wapner, W., & Michelow, D. (1983). Missing the point: The role of the right hemisphere in the processing of complex linguistic materials. In E. Perecman (Ed.), Cognitive processing in the right hemisphere. New York: Academic Press.
13. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts, V(pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
14. Hough, M. (1990). Narrative comprehension in participants with right and left hemisphere brain-damage: Theme organization. Brain and Language, 38, 253-277.
15. Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., & Hannequin, D. (1990). Right hemisphere and verbal communication. New York: Springer.
16. Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., Ska, B., & Nespoulous, J. L. (1986). Informative content of narrative discourse in right-brain-damaged right handers. Brain and Language, 29, 81-105.
17. Kaplan, J. A., Brownell, H. H., Jacobs, J. R., & Gardner, H. (1990). The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain and Language, 38, 315-333.
18. Kellermann, K. (1991). The conversation MOP: II. Progression through scenes in discourse. Human Communication Research, 17, 385-414.
19. Kellermann, K., Broetzmann, S., Lim, T., & Kitao, K. (1989). The conversation MOP: Scenes in the stream of discourse. Discourse Processes, 12, 27-61.
20. Kellermann, K., & Lim, T. (1990). The conversation MOP: III. Timing of scenes in discourse. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1163-1179.
21. Kennedy, M., Strand, E., Burton, W., & Peterson, C. (1994). Analysis of first-encounter conversations of right-hemisphere damaged participants. Clinical Aphasiology. 22, 67-80.
22. Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative communicative systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66-82.
23. Lojek-Osiejuk, E. (1996). Knowledge of scripts reflected in discourse of aphasies and right-hemisphere-brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 53, 58-80.
24. Myers, P. S. (1979). Profiles of communication deficits in patients with right cerebral hemisphere damage. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology: Conference proceedings (pp. 38-46). Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
25. Myers, P. S. (1998). Right hemisphere damage: Disorders of communication and cognition. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
26. Myers, P. S., & Brookshire, R. H. (1994). The effects of visual and inferential complexity on the picture descriptions of non-brain-damaged participants and right-hemisphere-damaged participants. Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 195-206.
27. Myers, P. S., & Brookshire, R. H. (1996). Effect of visual and inferential variables on scene descriptions by right-hemisphere-damaged and non-brain-damaged participants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 870-880.
28. Ostrove, J. M., Simpson, T., & Gardner, T. (1990). Beyond scripts: A note on the capacity of right hemisphere-damaged patients to process social and emotional content. Brain and Cognition, 12, 144-154.
29. Rehak, A., Kaplan, J. A., & Gardner, H. (1992). Sensitivity to conversational deviance in right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 42, 203-217.
30. Roman, M., Brownell, H. H., Potter, H. H., Seibold, M. S., & Gardner, H. (1987). Script knowledge in right hemisphere-damaged and in normal elderly participants. Brain and Language, 31, 151-170.
31. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
32. Schank, R. C. (1977). Rules and topic scenes in conversation. Cognitive Science, 1, 421-441.
33. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 4, 289-327.
36. Simmons-Mackie, N., & Kagan, A. (1998, June). Strategies used by speaking partners and individuals with aphasia in conversations rated as good vs. poor. Paper presented at Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Asheville, NC.
37. Tompkins, C. A. (1995). Right hemisphere communication disorders: Theory and management. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
38. Tompkins, C. A., & Baumgaertner, A. (1998). Clinical value of online measures for adults with right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7(1), 68-74.
39. Tompkins, C. A., Baumgaertner, A., Lehman, M. T., & Fossett, T. R. D. (1997). Suppression and discourse comprehension in right brain-damaged adults: A preliminary report. Aphasiology, II, 505-519.
40. Tompkins, C. A., Boada, R., McGarry, K., Jones, J., Rahn, A. E., & Ranier, S. (1993). Connected speech characteristics of right-hemisphere-damaged adults: A re-examination. Clinical Aphasiology, 21, 113-122.