Determinants of equivocation: The influence of situational formality, interaction phase, and ambiguity tolerance

Communication Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 161-193

  Bello, Richard ^a  

^a Social Interaction   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034384307     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009365000027002003     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adler, R. B. (1992). Communicating at work. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Adler, R. B., & Towne, N. (1978). Looking out/looking in: Interpersonal communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Archer, R. L., & Burleson, J. A. (1980). The effects of timing of self-disclosure on attraction and reciprocity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 120-130.
5. Bavelas, J. B. (1983). Situations that lead to disqualification. Human Communication Research, 9(2), 130-145.
6. Bavelas, J. B. (1985). A situational theory of disqualification: Using language to "leave the field." In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Language and social situations (pp. 189-211). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Bryson, L., & Mullett, J. (1988). Political equivocation: A situational explanation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 137-145.
8. Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (1986). How people disqualify: Experimental studies of spontaneous written disqualification. Communication Monographs, 53, 70-74.
10. Bavelas, J. B., & Smith, B. J. (1982). A method for scaling verbal disqualification. Human Communication Research, 8(3), 214-227.
11. Berger, C. R. (1987). Communicating under uncertainty. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 39-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Berger, C. R., & Kellermann, K. A. (1983). To ask or not to ask: Is that a question? In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 7. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Besnier, N. (1989). Information withholding as a manipulative and collusive strategy in Nukulaelae gossip. Language in Society, 18(3), 315-341.
14. Bradac, J. J., Hopper, R., & Wiemann, J. M. (1989). Message effects: Retrospect and prospect. In J. J. Bradac (Ed.), Message effects in communication science (pp. 294-317). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Bradac, J. J., Konsky, C. W., & Davies, R. A. (1975). Two studies on communicational consequences of elaborated and restricted language performance. University of Iowa. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 103 931)
16. Bradac, J. J., Konsky, C. W., & Davies, R. A. (1976). Two studies of the effects of linguistic diversity upon judgments of communicator attributes and message effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 43(1), 70-79.
17. Bull, P. (1998). Equivocation theory and news interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 36-51.
18. Bull, P., Elliot, J., Palmer, D., & Walker, L. (1996). Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 267-284.
19. Burgoon, J. K. (1991). Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 233-259.
20. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193-214.
21. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54(1), 19-41.
22. Cappella, J. N., & Street, R. L. (1989). Message effects: Theory and research on mental models of messages. In J. J. Bradac (Ed.), Message effects in communication science (pp. 24-51). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Comadena, M. E. (1984). Brainstorming groups: Ambiguity tolerance, communication apprehension, task attraction, and individual productivity. Small Group Behavior, 15(2), 251-264.
26. Cunningham, M. A., & Wilcox, J. R. (1984). When an M.D. gives an R.N. a harmful order: Modifying a bind. In R. N. Bostrom & B. H. Westley (Eds.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 764-778). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. DeVito, J. A. (1992). The interpersonal communication book. New York: Harper-Collins.
28. Edwards, R. (1998). The effects of gender, gender role, and values on the interpretation of messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 52-71.
29. Eisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242.
30. Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn, Germany: Bonn University, Deptartment of Psychology.
31. Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., Friedman, P. G., & Kreps, G. L. (1990). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32. Gibson, D. V., & Mendleson, B. E. (1984). Redundancy. Journal of Business Communication, 21(1), 43-61.
33. Goss, B. (1972). The effect of sentence context on associations to ambiguous, vague, and clear nouns. Communication Monographs, 39, 286-289.
34. Goss, B., & O'Hair, D. (1988). Communicating in interpersonal relationships. New York: Macmillan.
35. Goss, B., & Williams, L. (1973). The effects of equivocation on perceived source credibility. Central States Speech Journal, 24(3), 162-167.
36. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
37. Grice, H. P. (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
38. Haley, J. (1959). An interactional description of schizophrenia. Psychiatry, 22, 321-322.
39. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.
40. Hamilton, M. A. (1998). Message variables that mediate and moderate the effect of equivocal language on source credibility. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 109-143.
41. Hamilton, M. A., & Rendino, S. (1987, November). The effects of lexical precision. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Boston.
42. Hewes, D. E. (1983). Confessions of a methodological puritan: A response to Jackson and Jacobs. Human Communication Research, 9(2), 187-191.
43. Hopper, R. (1989). Sequential ambiguity in telephone openings: "What are you doin." Communication Monographs, 56, 240-252.
44. Hsia, H. J. (1977). Redundancy: Is it the lost key to better communication? AV Communication Review, 25, 63-85.
45. Huseman, R. C. (1977). Interpersonal conflict in the modern organization. In R. C Huseman, C. M. Logue, & D. L. Freshley (Eds.), Readings in interpersonal and organizational communication (pp. 222-233). Boston: Holbrook Press.
46. Irvine, J. T. (1978). Formality and informality in speech events (Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, No. 52). Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab. (ERIC Doc. No. ED 165 492)
47. Irvine, J. T. (1979). Formality and informality in communicative events. American Anthropologist, 81, 773-790.
48. Jones, E. E., & Gordon, E. M. (1972). The timing of self-disclosure and its effect on personal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 358-365.
49. Kellermann, K. A. & Berger, C. R. (1984). Affect and acquisition of social information: Sit back, relax, and tell me about yourself. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 412-445). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Leginski, W., & Izzet, R. R. (1973). Linguistic styles as indices for interpersonal distance. Journal of Social Psychology, 91, 291-304.
51. Little, C. B. & Gelles, R. J. (1972). "Hey you": A study of the socialpsychological implications of form of address. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Doc. No. ED 074 405)
52. Motley, M. T. (1992). Mindfulness in solving communicators dilemmas. Communication Monographs, 59, 306-314.
53. Norton, R. (1976). Manifestations of ambiguity tolerance through verbal behavior in small groups. Communication Monographs, 43 35-43.
54. Norton, R. W. (1975). Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39(6), 607-619.
55. Putnam, L. L., & Sorenson, R. L. (1982). Equivocal messages in organizations. Human Communication Research, 8(2), 114-132.
56. Sillars, A. L., Weisberg, J., Burgraff, C. S., & Zeitlow, P. H. (1990) Communication and understanding revisited: Married couples' understanding and recall of conversations. Communication Research, 17(4), 500-522.
57. Tanaka, K. M., & Bell, R. A. (1996). Equivocation in America and Japan: A cross-national comparison of the effects of situational conflict and status. Communication Research, 23, 261-296.
58. Verderber, R. F., & Verderber, K. S. (1995). Inter-act: Using interpersonal communication skills. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
59. Williams, M. L. (1980). The effect of deliberate vagueness on receiver recall and agreement. Central States Speech Journal, 31, 30-41.
60. Williams, M. L., & Goss, B. (1975). Equivocation: Character insurance. Human Communication Research, 1, 265-270.
61. Wish, M. (1976). Comparisons among multidimensional structures of interpersonal relations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 11, 297-324.
62. Wish, M., Deutsch, M., & Kaplan, S. J. (1976). Perceived dimensions of interpersonal relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(4), 409-420.
63. Wish, M., & Kaplan, S. J. (1977). Toward an implicit theory of interpersonal communication. Sociometry, 40(3), 234-246.
64. Wortman, C. B., Adesman, P., Herman, E., & Greenberg, R. (1976). Self-disclosure: An attributional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 184-191.