Controversies in the Field of Hearing Impairment: Early Identification, Educational Methods, and Cochlear Implants

Infants and Young Children

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 77-88

  Samson Fang, Lisa ^a,b   Simons McCandless, Marsha ^a   Shelton, Clough ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Audiology; Cochlear implants; Deafness; Early intervention; Education; Hearing impairment; Language; Pediatrics; Speech

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034382067     PISSN: 08963746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001163-200012040-00012     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Mauk G, Behrens T. Historical, political, and technological context associated with early identification of hearing loss. Semin Hearing. 1993;14:1-17.
2. National Institutes of Health. Identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 1993.
3. White K, Vohr B, Behrens T. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient otoacoustic emmissions: Results of the Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Project. Semin Hearing. 1993;14:18-29.
4. Paul PV. Literacy and deafness: the development of reading, writing and literate thought. Boston, Mass: Allyn & Bacon; 1998.
5. Allen T. Patterns of academic achievement among hearing-impaired students: 1974 and 1983. In: Schildroth A, Karchmer M, eds. Deaf Children in America. San Diego, Calif: College-Hill Press; 1986:161-206.
6. Watson B, Sullivan P, Teare J, Thompson R. Osberger MJ, eds. Language and learning skills of hearing impaired children. ASHA Monogmph. 1986;23:32-37.
7. Geers A, Moog J. Factors predictive of the development of literacy in profoundly hearing impaired adolescents. Volta Rev. 1989;91:69-87.
8. Kelly L. Processing of bottom-up and top-down information by skilled and average deaf readers and implications for whole language instruction. Except Child. 1995;61:318-334.
9. Trybus R, Karchmer M. School achievement scores of hearing-impaired children: national data on achievement status and growth patterns. Am Ann Deaf. 1977;122:62-69.
10. Holt JA. Stanford Achievement Test - 8th edition: reading comprehension subgroup results. Am Ann Deaf. 1993;138(reference issue):172-175.
11. Quigley SP, Paul PV. Language and Deafness. San Diego, Calif: Singular Publishing; 1990.
12. Parving A. Congenital hearing disability: epidemiology and identification: a comparison between two health authority districts. Int J Pediatr Otolaryngol 1993;27:29-46.
13. Elssmann SF, Matkin N, Sabo M. Early identification of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment. Hearing J. 1987;40:13-17.
14. Mauk G, White K, Mortensen L, Behrens T. The effectiveness of screening programs based on high-risk characteristics in early identification of hearing loss. Ear Hearing. 1991;12:312-319.
15. Stein L. On the real age of identification of congenital hearing loss. Audiol Today. 1995;7:10-11.
16. Harrison M, Roush J. Age of suspicion, identification and intervention for infants and young children with hearing loss. Ear Hearing. 1996;17:55-62.
17. Watkins P, Baldwin M, McEnery G. Neonatal at risk screening and identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child. 1991; 66:1130-1135.
18. Northern JL, Downs MP. Hearing in Children. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1991.
19. Marschark M. Psychological Development of Deaf Children. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1997.
20. Pappas DG. A study of the high-risk registry for sensorineural hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1983;91:41-44.
21. Robinshaw HM. Early intervention for hearing impairment: differences in the timing of communicative and linguistic development. Br J Audiol. 1995;29:315-334.
22. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics. 1998;102:1161-1171.
23. Apuzzo ML, Yoshinaga-Itano C. Early identification of infants with significant hearing loss and the Minnesota Child Development Inventory. Semin Hearing. 1995;16:124-137.
24. American Academy of Pediatrics. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 position statement. Pediatrics. 1995;95:152-156.
25. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1990. DHHS Publication 91-50213.
26. American Academy of Audiology. American Academy of Audiology position statement: early identification of hearing loss in children. Audiol Today. 1988;1:1-2.
27. Bess FH, Paradise JL. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: not simple, not risk-free, not necessarily beneficial, and not presently justified. Pediatrics. 1994; 93:330-334.
28. US Department of Health and Human Services. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1996.
29. White KR, Mauk GW, Culpepper NB, Weirather Y. Newborn hearing screening in the United States: is it becoming standard of care? In: Spivak L, ed. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening. New York, NY: Thieme; 1998: 225-255.
30. American Academy of Pediatrics. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. Pediatrics. 1999;103:527-530.
31. Schuman AJ. Universal newborn hearing screening: the time is right. Contemp Pediatr. 1998;15(7):49-60.
32. Schwartz, S. ed. Choices in Deafness: A Parents' Guide to Communication Options. 2nd ed. Bethesda, Md: Woodbine House; 1996.
33. Stokoe W. Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College; 1971. Originally published 1960.
34. Karchmer MA. Demographics of deaf adolescence. In: Anderson GB, Watson D, eds. The Habilitation and Rehabilitation of the Deaf Adolescent. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press; 1985: 28-47.
35. Power DJ, Hyde MB. The cochlear implant and the deaf community. Med J Aust. 1992;157:41-42.
36. Cornett RO. Diagnostic factors bearing on the use of cued speech with hearing-impaired children. Ear Hearing. 1985;6:33-35.
37. Quigley S, Frisina D. Institutionalism and Psychoeducational Development of Deaf Children. Washington, D.C.: Council on Exceptional Children; 1961. Series A, No. 3.
38. Stuckless E, Birch J. The influence of early manual communication on the linguistic development of deaf children. Am Ann Deaf. 1966;111:452-460.
39. Meadow K. Early manual communication in relation to the deaf child's intellectual, social and communicative function. Am Ann Deaf. 1968;113:29-41.
40. Sisco F, Anderson R. Deaf children's performance on the WISC-R relative to hearing status of parents and child-rearing experiences. Am Ann Deaf. 1980;125:923-930.
41. Schlesinger H, Meadow K. Sounds and Sign: Childhood Deafness and Mental Health. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1972.
42. Brasel K, Quigley S. Influence of certain language and communicative environments in early childhood on the development of language in deaf individuals. J Speech Hearing Res. 1977;20:95-107.
43. Quigley S, Kretschmer R. The Education of Deaf Children. San Diego, Calif: Singular Publishing; 1982.
44. Geers A, Moog J. Acquisition of spoken and signed English by profoundly deaf children. J Speech Hearing Dis. 1989;53:136-143.
45. Harrison D, Simpson P, Stuart A. The development of written language in a population of hearing-impaired children. J Br Assoc Teachers Deaf. 1991;15:76-85.
46. Lynas W. Communication Options in the Education of Deaf Children. London: Whurr Publishers; 1994.
47. Holden-Pitt C, Diaz J. Thirty years of the annual survey of deaf and hard-of-hearing children and youth: a glance over the decade. Am Ann Deaf. 1998;143:72-76.
48. Bornstein U, Saulnier K, Hamilton L. Signed English: a first evaluation. Am Ann Deaf. 1980;125:467-481.
49. Norden K. Learning processes and personality development in deaf children. Am Ann Deaf. 1981;126:404-410.
50. Evans L. Some effects of total communication as perceived by parents of deaf children. J Br Assoc Teachers Deaf. 1989;12:142-146.
51. Geers AE, Moog J. Speech perception and production skills of students with impaired hearing from oral and total communication settings. J Speech Hearing Res. 1992;35:1384-1393.
52. Markides A. Speech intelligibility: auditory-oral approach versus total communication. J Br Assoc Teachers Deaf . 1988;12:136-141.
53. Newton L. Linguistic environment of the deaf child: a focus on teachers' use of non-literal language. J Speech Hearing Res. 1985;28:336-364.
54. Potts G. Some impressions of the services for the hearing impaired in Denmark. Teachers Deaf. 1974;72:244-250.
55. Latimer G. TC or not TC? J Br Assoc Teachers Deaf. 1983;7:99-101.
56. Reynolds D. Parallel Views: The Spirit of Bi-Bi: Two languages and Two Cultures. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press; 1994.
57. Nevins M, Chute P. Children with Cochlear Implants in Educational Settings. San Diego, Calif: Singular Publishing; 1996.
58. Staller S, Beiter A, Brimacombe J. Use of Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant systems with children. Volta Rev. 1994;96:15-40.
59. Waltzman S, Cohen N, Gomolin R, et al. Open-set speech perception in congenitally deaf children using cochlear implants. Am J Otol. 1997;18:342-349.
60. Gantz B, Rubinstein J, Tyler R, Teable H, Cohen N, Waltzman S. Long term results in children using the Continuous Interleaved Sampler (CIS) strategy. Presented at: Seventh Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children; 1998; Iowa City, Iowa.
61. Aundt P, Staller S, Brumacombe J, Beiter A, Ebenger K. Postoperative outcomes for children implanted with the N-24 cochlear implant system. Presented at: Seventh Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children. 1998; Iowa City, Iowa.
62. Brackett D, Zara C. Communication outcomes related to early implantation. Am J Otol. 1998;19:453-459.
63. Svirsky M. Language development in early-implanted prelinguistically deaf cochlear implant users. Presented at: Seventh Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children. 1998; Iowa City, Iowa.
64. Osberger M, Robbins A, Todd S, Riley A. Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants. Volta Rev. 1994; 96:169-180.
65. Ashbaugh C, Zwolan T, De Bau J, Kileny P. Match pairs comparison of speech perception skills of cochlear implant recipients and hearing aid users enrolled in the same classroom(s). Presented at: Seventh Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children. 1998; Iowa City, Iowa.
66. Tomblin J, Spencer L, Flock S, Tyler R, Gantz B. A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. J Speech Lang Hearing Res. 1998;42:497-511.
67. Sarant JCR, Blamey P, Calvin K, Clark G. Cochlear implants for congenitally deaf adolescents: is open-set speech perception a realistic expectation? Ear Hearing. 1994;15:400-403.