In the Aftermath of Invalidation: Shaping Judgment Rules on Learning That Previous Information Was Invalid

Journal of Consumer Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 213-222

  Mazursky, David ^a   Schul, Yaacov ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034379273     PISSN: 10577408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327663JCP0904_3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1049.
2. Bettman, J. R. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Burnstein, E., & Schul, Y. (1982). The informational basis of social judgments: Operations in forming an impression of another person. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 217-234.
4. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, &C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 605-614.
6. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
7. Dyer, R. F., & Kuehl, P. G. (1978). A longitudinal study of corrective advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 39-48.
8. Frieze, I. H., Parsons, J. H., Johnson, P. B., Ruble, D. N., & Zellman, G. L. (1978). Women and sex roles: A social psychological perspective. New York: Norton.
9. Golding, J. M., Fowler, S. B., Long, D. L., & Latta, H. (1990). Instructions to disregard potentially useful information: The effects of pragmatics on evaluative judgments and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 212-227.
10. Hannah, D., & Sternthal, B. (1984). Detecting and explaining the sleeper effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 632-642.
11. Mazis, M. B., & Adkinson, J. E. (1976). An experimental evaluation of a proposed corrective advertising remedy. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 178-183.
12. Mazursky, D., & Schul, Y. (1988). The effects of advertisement encoding on the failure to discount information: Implications for the sleeper effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 24-36.
13. Moore, D. L., Hausknecht, D., & Thamodaran, K. (1986). Time compression, response opportunity, and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 85-99.
14. Osterhouse, R. A., & Brock, T. C. (1970). Distraction increases yielding to propaganda by inhibiting counterarguing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 344-358.
15. Park, J. W., & Hastak, M. (1994). Memory-based product judgments: Effects of involvement at encoding and retrieval. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 534-547.
16. Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366-387.
17. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration-likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). San Diego, CA: Academic.
18. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
19. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating roof involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135-146.
20. Ratneshwar, S., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Comprehension's role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 52-62.
21. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1990). The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 614-622.
22. Schul, Y., & Burnstein, E. (1985). When discounting fails: Conditions under which individuals use discredited information in making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 894-903.
23. Schul, Y., Burnstein, E., & Bardi, A. (1996). Dealing with deceptions that are difficult to detect: Encoding and judgment as a function of preparing to receive invalid information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 228-253.
24. Schul, Y., & Mazursky, D. (1990). Conditions facilitating successful discounting in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 442-451.
25. Solomon, M. R. (1996). Consumer behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 798-810.
27. Wood, W., Kallgren, C. A., & Priesler, R. M. (1985). Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 73-85.