Mueller on european federation: A reply from the perspective of Australian federalism

Public Choice

Volumn 105, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 255-272

  Aroney, Nicholas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034368019     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005125807405     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Allott, P. (1991). The EC is not the true EC. Yale Law Journal 100: 2484-2500.
2. Althusius, J. (1995). Politica. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
3. Amalg Society of Engineers v. Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 129.
4. Aroney, N.T. (1999). Federal representation and the framers of the Australian constitution. In G.A. Moens (Ed.), Constitutional and international law perspectives: Achievements and challenges. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
5. Bailyn, B. (1967). The ideological origins of the American revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. Baker v. Carr. (1961). 369 US 186.
7. Bradley, T. (1998). Unpublished paper presented to a forum entitled The constitutional convention in retrospect. The Australian Study of Parliament Group, Legislative Council Chamber, Parliament House, Brisbane, 25 March, 1998.
8. Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J.M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1965). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. Cockburn, J.A. (1897). Speech to the National Australasian Convention. In G. Craven (Ed.), Official record of the debates of the Australasian federal convention. Adelaide, Sydney: Legal Books.
11. Cooray, L.J.M. and Ratnapala, S. (1986). The High Court and the constitution: Literalism and beyond. In G. Craven (Ed.), The convention debates 1891-1898, Vol. 6: 203-225. Sydney: Legal Books.
12. Craven, G. (1992). The states - decline, fall, or what? In G. Craven (Ed.), Australian federation: Towards the second century. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
13. Curtin, D. (1993). The constitutional structure of the Union: A Europe of bits and pieces. Common Market Law Review 30: 17-69.
14. Gaegeler, S. and Leeming, M. (1996). An Australian republic: Is a referendum enough? Public Law Review 7: 143-154.
15. Galligan, B. (1987). Politics of the High Court: A study of the judicial branch of government in Australia. St. Lucia, Qld: University of Queensland Press.
16. Gibbs, H. (1994a). The Australian constitution and Australian constitutional monarchy. In M.A. Stephenson and C. Turner (Eds.), Australia: Republic or monarchy? Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
17. Gibbs, H. (1994b). The decline of federalism? University of Queensland Law Journal 18: 1-8.
18. Elazar, D.J. (1988). The American constitutional tradition. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
19. Fairfax v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1965) 114 CLR 1.
20. La Nauze, J.A. (1972). The making of the Australian constitution. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
21. Lindell, G.J. (1994). Recent developments in the judicial interpretation of the Australian constitution. In G.J. Lindell (Ed.), Future directions in Australian constitutional law. Annandale, NSW: Federation Press.
22. Madison, J. (1961). The federalist, No. 15. In C. Rossiter (Ed.), The federalist papers. New York: Mentor.
23. Maitland, F.W. (1955). The constitutional history of England. Cambridge: University Press.
24. Migué, J.-L. (1997). Public choice in a federal system. Public Choice 90: 235-254.
25. Monnet, J. (1978). Memoirs. R. Mayne, trans. London: Collins.
26. Mueller, D.C. (1989). Public choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Mueller, D.C. (1991). Constitutional rights. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organisation 7: 313-333.
28. Mueller, D.C. (1996). Constitutional democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Mueller, D.C. (1997). Federalism and the European Union: A constitutional perspective. Public Choice 90: 255-280.
30. Natapoff, A. (1996). A mathematical one-man one-vote rationale for Madisonian presidential voting based on maximum individual voting power. Public Choice 88: 259-273.
31. New York v. United States (1992). 505 US 144.
32. Printz v. United States (1997). 95-1478, 95-1503.
33. Quick, J. and Garran, R.R. (1901). Annotated constitution of the Australian Commonwealth. Sydney: Angus and Robinson.
34. Rousseau, J.-J. (1984). The social contract. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
35. Rowley, C.K. (1997). Introduction: The relevance of public choice for constitutional political economy. Public Choice 90: 1-10.
36. Tasmania v. Commonwealth (1983). 158 CLR 1.
37. Thomson, J.A. (1986). Constitutional authority for judicial review: A contribution from the framers of the Australian constitution. In Craven, G. (Ed.), The convention debates 1891-1898, Vol. 6. Sydney: Legal Books.
38. Tullock, G. (1994). The new federalist. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute. United States v. Lopez (1995). 514 US 549.
39. Zywicki, T. (1997). Beyond the shell and husk of history: The history of the seventeenth amendment and its implications for current reform proposals. Cleveland State Law Review 45: 165-234.