Lexical representation of compound words: Cross-linguistic evidence

Psychologia

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 47-66

  Zhou, Xiaolin ^a   Marslen Wilson, William ^b  

^a UK   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Chinese; Compound words; Lexical representation; Morphological processing; Morphology

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034365820     PISSN: 00332852     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andrews, S. 1986. Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 726-740.
2. Butterworth, B. 1983. Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production. London: Academic Press.
3. Bybee, J.L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. 1988. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
5. Chen, H.-C., & Cutler, A. 1997. Auditory priming in spoken and written word recognition. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive Processing Chinese and Other Related Asian Languages (pp. 77-81). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
6. Coltheart, V., Patterson, K., & Leahy, J. 1994. When a ROWS is a ROSE: Phonological effects in written word comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 917-955.
7. Feldman, L. B. 1995. Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Feldman, L. B., & Fowler, C. A. 1987. The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure. Memory & Cognition, 15, 1-12.
9. Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. 1985. Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13, 241-255.
10. Frost, R. 1998. Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
11. Grainger, J., Cole, P., & Segui, J. 1991. Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 370-384.
12. Institute of Language Teaching and Research. 1986. A frequency dictionary of Modern Chinese. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.
13. Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. 1991. Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358-394.
14. Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. 1993. Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 285-294.
15. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Lukatala, G., Gligorijevic, B., Kostic, A., & Turvey, M. 1980. Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory & Cognition, 8, 415-423.
17. Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. 1994. Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1, Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
18. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. 1994. Morphological structure in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
19. Monsell, S. 1985. Repetition and the lexicon. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. 1996. Understanding Normal and Impaired Word Reading: Computational Principles in Quasi-Regular Domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
21. Rueckl, J. G., Mikolinski, M., Raveh, M., Miner, C., & Mars, F. 1997. Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connnectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 382-405.
22. Sandra, D. 1990. On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 529-567.
23. Sandra, D., & Taft, M. 1994. Morphological structure, lexical representation and lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9 (Special Issue).
24. Seidenberg, M. S. 1987. Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Seidenberg, M. S. 1989. Reading complex words. In G. N. Carslon & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26. Seidenberg, M.S., & McClelland, J. L. 1989. A distributed, developmental model of visual word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
27. Taft, M. 1991. Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Taft, M., & Forster, K. 1975. Lexical storage and retrival of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
29. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. 1976. Lexical storage and retrival of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607-620.
30. Taft, M., & van Graan, F. 1998. Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203-224.
31. Van Orden, G. C. 1987. A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
32. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. 1994. Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
33. Van Orden, G. C., Jansen op de Haar, M. A., & Bosman, A. M. T. 1997. Complex dynamic systems also predict dissociations, but they do not reduce to autonomous components. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 131-165.
34. Zhang, B., & Peng, D. 1992. Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon. In H.-C. Cheng & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
35. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. 1994. Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 393-422.
36. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. 1995. Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 545-600.
37. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. 1997. The abstractness of phonological representation in the Chinese mental lexicon. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing Chinese and other related Asian languages (pp. 3-26). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
38. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. 1999. Phonology, orthography, and lexical semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 579-606.
39. Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (in press). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
40. Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. 1999. Morphology, orthography, and phonology in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 525-565.
41. Zwitserlood, P. 1994. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 341-368.