A cognitive analysis of the Chinese room argument

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 313-324

  Teng, Norman Y ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN STUDIES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034364884     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09515080050128141     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. CHALMERS, D.J. (1992). Subsymbolic computation and the Chinese room. In J. DINSMORE (Ed.) The symbolic and connectionist paradigms: closing the gap. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. CHALMERS, D.J. (1994a). On implementing a computation. Mind and Machines, 4, 391-402.
3. CHALMERS, D.J. (1994b). A computational foundation for the study of cognition (PNP Technical Report, 94-03). St. Louis, MO: Washington University (available from http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/ ~philos/pnp).
4. CHALMERS, D.J. (1996). The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. CHURCHLAND, P.M. & CHURCHLAND, P.S. (1990). Could a machine think? Scientific American, 262, 32-37.
6. FAUCONNIER, G. (1994). Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. FAUCONNIER, G. (1996). Analogical counterfactuals. In G. FAUCONNIER & E. SWEETSER (Eds) Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. FAUCONNIER, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. FAUCONNIER, G. & TURNER, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. GOLDBERG (Ed.) Conceptual structure, discourse, and language. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (distributed by Cambridge University Press).
10. FAUCONNIER, G. & TURNER, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133-187.
11. LAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. LAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
13. SEARLE, J. (1980a). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417-424.
14. SEARLE, J. (1980b). Intrinsic intentionality: reply to criticisms of minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 450-457.
15. SEARLE, J. (1982). The Chinese room revisited: response to further commentaries on minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 345-348.
16. SEARLE, J. (1984). Mind, brain and science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. SEARLE, J. (1990). Is the brain's mind a computer program? Scientific American, 262, 20-25.
18. SEARLE, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. SEARLE, J. (1997a). The explanation of cognition. Philosophy: The Journal of Royal Institute of Philosophy, Supplement, 42, 103-126.
20. SEARLE, J. (1997b). The mystery of consciousness. New York: New York Review of Books.
21. TENG, N.Y. (1999). The language of thought and the embodied nature of language use. Philosophical Studies, 94, 237-251.
22. TURNER, M. (1996a). Conceptual blending and counterfactual argument in the social and behavioral sciences. In P. TELOCK & A. BELKIN (Eds) Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23. TURNER, M. (1996b). The literary mind: the origins of thought and language. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. TURNER, M. & FAUCONNIER, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 183-204.
25. TURNER, M. & FAUCONNIER, G. (in press). Metaphor, metonomy, and binding. In A. BARCELONA (Ed.) Metonomy and metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (available from http://www.wam.umd.edu/ ~ mturn).