Phase transition of ising spin glass models in two dimensions

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

Volumn 69, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 2798-2807

  Shiomi, Michinori ^a,c   Matsubara, Fumitaka ^a   Shirakura, Takayuki ^b  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b IWATE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c SONY CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cluster heat bath; Defect energy; Monte Carlo; Spin glass; Two dimensional ising model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034362098     PISSN: 00319015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.69.2798     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. N. G. Bhanot, D. Duke and R. Salvador: Phys. Rev. B 33 (1986) 7841.
2. F. Barahona, R. Maynard, R. Rammal and J. P. Uhry: J. Phys. A 15 (1982) 673.
3. R. H. Swendsen and J. S. Wang: Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 86.
4. U. Wolff: Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 361.
5. F. Matsubara, T. Iyota and S. Inawashiro: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60 (1991) 41.
6. R. H. Swendsen and J. S. Wang: Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 2607.
7. B. A. Berg and T. Neuhaus: Phys. Lett. B 267 (1991) 249.
8. E. Marinari and G. Parisi: Europhys. Lett. 19 (1992) 451.
9. K. Hukushima and K. Nemoto: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65 (1996) 1604.
10. A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore: J. Phys. C 17 (1984) L463.
11. A. K. Hartmann: Phys. Rev. E 59 (1999) 84.
12. N. Kawashima and A. P. Young: Phys. Rev. B 53 (1996) R484.
13. E. Marinari, G. Parisi and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo: Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998) 14852.
14. W. L. McMillan: Phys. Rev. B 29 (1984) 4026.
15. H. Rieger et al.: J. Phys. A 29 (1996) 3939.
16. Y. Ozeki: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 59 (1990) 3531.
17. M. Cieplak and J. R. Banavar: J. Phys. A 23 (1990) 4385.
18. Y. Ozeki: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 62 (1993) 2641.
19. N. Kawashima and H. Rieger: Europhys. Lett. 39 (1997) 85.
20. R. N. Bhatt and A. P. Young: Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 5606.
21. J. S. Wang and R. H. Swendsen: Phys. Rev. B 38 (1988) 4840.
22. S. Liang: Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2145.
23. N. Kawashima, N. Hatano and M. Suzuki: J. Phys. A 25 (1992) 4985.
24. M. Ney-Nifle and A. P. Young: J. Phys. A. 30 (1997) 5311.
25. 6)
26. T. Shirakura and F. Matsubara: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65 (1996) 3138.
27. O. Koseki and F. Matsubara: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66 (1997) 322.
28. F. Matsubara, A. Sato, O. Koseki and T. Shirakura: Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3237.
29. F. Matsubara, T. Shirakura and M. Shiomi: Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998) R11821.
30. T. Shirakura and F. Matsubara: Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 2887.
31. E. Muller-Hartmann and J. Zittartz: Z. Physik B 27 (1977) 261.
32. I. Morgenstern and K. Binder: Phys. Rev. B 22 (1980) 288.
33. For the CHB method, after 40 MC steps are discarded, M = 300 spin configurations are stored for every 6 MC steps.
34. G. Parisi: Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1946; and references there in.
35. A. P. Young: Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1206.
36. L(|Q|)'s for T → 0 may be well approximated by those at T = 0.1J, because at low temperatures they change a very little (see Fig. 5). In particular, their peak heights for the smaller lattices (L = 12, 16) almost unchange for T ≤ 0.2J. A slight increase of the heihgt is seen for larger lattices. If this tendency lasts down to T = 0, it will enhance the discrepancy of the scaling plot of Fig. 13.
37. 30)
38. J. D. Reger and A. P. Young: Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 5493.