c-myc gene sequences and the phylogeny of bats and other eutherian mammals

Systematic Biology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 501-514

  Miyamoto, Michael M ^a   Porter, Calvin A ^b   Goodman, Morris ^c  

^a University of Florida ^*  (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

c myc gene; Chiroptera; DNA sequences; Eutherian mammals; Maximum likelihood; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ARTIODACTYLA; BOVIDAE; CAMELIDAE; CANIS FAMILIARIS; CARNIVORA; CHIROPTERA; EUTHERIA; FELIS CATUS; MAMMALIA; SUS SCROFA;

PRIMER DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAT; CAT; CLASSIFICATION; DOG; GENETICS; HUMAN; MAMMAL; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ONCOGENE MYC; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CATS; CHIROPTERA; DNA PRIMERS; DOGS; GENES, MYC; HUMANS; MAMMALS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0034350322     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635159950127367     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. AIdie;SSANI, B., AND G. BERNARDI. 1991a. CpG islands: Features and distribution in the genomes of vertebrates. Gene 106:173-183.
2. AÏSSANI, B., AND G. BERNARDI. 1991b. CpG islands, genes and isochores in the genomes of vertebrates. Gene 106:185-195.
3. ALLARD, M. W., B. E. MCNIFF, AND M. M. MlYAMOTO. 1996. Support for interordinal eutherian relationships with an emphasis on primates and their archontan relatives. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:78-88.
4. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1983. Checklist of North American birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.
5. ATCHLEY, W. R., AND W. M. FITCH. 1995. Myc and max: Molecular evolution of a family of protooncogene products and their dimerization partner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:10217-10221.
6. CAO, Y., J. ADACHI, A. JANKE, S. PÄÄBO, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: Instability of a tree based on a single gene. J. Mol. Evol. 39:519-527.
7. CAO, Y., A. JANKE, P. J. WADDELL, M. WESTERMAN, O. TAKENAKA, S. MURATA, N. OKADA, S. PÄÄBO, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1998. Conflict among individual mitochondrial proteins in resolving the phylogeny of eutherian orders. J. Mol. Evol. 47:307-322.
8. CAVENDER, J. A. 1978. Taxonomy with confidence. Math. Biosci. 40:270-280.
9. CZELUSNIAK, J., M. GOODMAN, B. F. KOOP, D. A. TAGLE, J. SHOSHANI, G. BRAUNITZER, T. K. KLEINSCHMIDT, W. W. DE JONG, AND G. MATSUDA. 1990. Perspectives from amino acid and nucleotide sequences on cladistic relationships among higher taxa of Eutheria. Curr. Mammal. 2:545-572.
10. DE JONG, W. W. 1998. Molecules remodel the mammalian tree. TREE 13:270-275.
11. Farris, J. S. 1973. A probability model for inferring evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 22:250-256.
12. GRAYBEAL, A. 1994. Evaluating the phylogenetic utility of genes: A search for genes informative about deep divergences among vertebrates. Syst. Biol. 43:174-191.
13. GREGORY, W. K. 1910. The orders of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 27:1-524.
14. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 21:160-174.
15. HENRIKSSON, M., AND B. LÜSCHER. 1996. Proteins of the myc network: Essential regulators of cell growth and differentiation. Adv. Canc. Res. 68:109-182.
16. HESKETH, R. 1997. The oncogene and tumour suppressor gene factsbook, 2nd edition. Academic, New York.
17. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1995. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44:17-48.
18. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND J. J. BULL. 1996. A likelihood ratio test to detect conflicting phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 45:92-98.
19. IRWIN, D. M., T. D. KOCHER, AND A. C. WILSON. 1991. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 32:128-144.
20. JABBARI, K., AND G. BERNARDI. 1998. CpG doublets, CpG islands and Alu repeats in long human DNA sequences from different isochore families. Gene 224:123-128.
21. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
22. KUMAR, S., K. TAMURA, AND M. NEI. 1993. MEGA: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis, version 1.01. Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park.
23. LAKE, J. A. 1994. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: Paralinear distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1455-1459.
24. LARSEN, F., G. GUNDERSEN, R. LOPEZ, AND H. PRYDZ. 1992. CpG islands as gene markers in the human genome. Genomics 13:1095-1107.
25. LI, W.-H. 1997. Molecular evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
26. LI, W.-H., M. GOUY, P. M. SHARP, C. O'HUIGIN, AND Y. W. YANG. 1990. Molecular phylogeny of Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Primates, Artiodactyla, and Carnivora and molecular clocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:6703-6707.
27. LIU, F.-G. R., AND M. M. MIYAMOTO. 1999. A phylogenetic assessment of molecular and morphological data for eutherian mammals. Syst. Biol. 48:54-64.
28. LOCKHART, P. J., M. A. STEEL, M. A. HENDY, AND D. PENNY. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more general model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-612.
29. LONGMIRE, J. L., M. MALTBIE, AND R. J. BAKER. 1997. Use of "lysis buffer" in DNA isolation and its implication for museum collections. Occ. Pap. Mus. Texas Tech Univ. 163:1-3.
30. LUCKETT, W. P., AND J.-L. HARTENBERGER. 1993. Monophyly or polyphyly of the order Rodentia: Possible conflict between morphological and molecular interpretations. J. Mammal. Evol. 1:127-147.
31. LUNDBERG, J. G. 1972. Wagner networks and ancestors. Syst. Zool. 21:398-413.
32. MACPHEE, R. D. E. (ed.). 1993. Primates and their relatives in phylogenetic perspective. Plenum, New York.
33. MATSUO, K., O. CLAY, T. TAKAHASHI, J. SILKE, AND W. SCHAFFNER. 1993. Evidence for erosion of mouse CpG islands during mammalian evolution. Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 19:543-555.
34. MIYAMOTO, M. M. 1996. A congruence study of molecular and morphological data for eutherian mammals. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6:373-390.
35. MOHAMMAD-ALI, K., M.-E. ELADARI, AND F. GALIBERT. 1995. Gorilla and orangutan c-myc nucleotide sequences: Inference on hominoid phylogeny. J. Mol. Evol. 41:262-276.
36. NOVACEK, M. J. 1993. Reflections on higher mammalian phylogenetics. J. Mammal. Evol. 1:3-30.
37. PENNY, D., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1997. The platypus put in its place. Nature 387:549-550.
38. PETTIGREW, J. D. 1986. Flying primates? Megabats have the advanced pathway from eye to midbrain. Science 231:1304-1306.
39. PETTIGREW, J. D. 1994. Flying DNA. Curr. Biol. 4:277-280.
40. PUMO, D. E., P. S. FINAMORE, W. R. FRANEK, C. J. PHILLIPS, S. TARZAMI, AND D. BALZARANO. 1998. Complete mitochondrial genome of a neotropical fruit bat, Artibeus jamaicensis, and a new hypothesis of the relationships of bats to other eutherian mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 47:709-717.
41. REYES, A., G. PESOLE, AND C. SACCONE. 1998. Complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the fat dormouse, Glis glis: Further evidence of rodent paraphyly. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:499-505.
42. RUVOLO, M. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of the hominoids: Inferences from multiple independent DNA sequence data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:248-265.
43. SHOSHANI J., C. P. GROVES, E. L. SIMONS, AND G. F. GUNNELL. 1996. Primate phylogeny: Morphological vs molecular results. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:102-154.
44. SHOSHANI, J., AND M. C. MCKENNA. 1998. Higher taxonomic relationships among extant mammals based on morphology, with selected comparisons of results from molecular data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:572-584.
45. SIMMONS, N. B. 1994. The case for chiropteran monophyly. Am. Mus. Nov. 3103:1-54.
46. SIMPSON, G. G. 1978. Early mammals in South America: Fact, controversy, and mystery. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 122:318-328.
47. STANHOPE, M. J., W. J. BAILEY, J. CZELUSNIAK, M. GOODMAN, J.-S. SI, J. NICKERSON, J. G. SGOUROS, G. A. M. SINGER, AND T. K. KLEINSCHMIDT. 1993. A molecular view of primate supraordinal relationships from the analysis of both nucleotide and amino acid sequences. Pages 251-292 in Primates and their relatives in phylogenetic perspective (R. D. E. MacPhee, ed.). Plenum, New York.
48. STRIMMER, K., AND A. VON HAESELER. 1996. Quartet puzzling: A quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:964-969.
49. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
50. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
51. SZALAY, F. S., AND S. G. LUCAS. 1996. The postcranial morphology of Paleocene Chriacus and Mixodectes and the phylogenetic relationships of archontan mammals. Bull. N. M. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. 7:1-47.
52. THOMPSON, J. D., D. G. HIGGINS, AND T. J. GIBSON. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nuc. Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
53. VAN DEN BUSSCHE, R. A., R. J. BAKER, J. P. HUELSENBECK, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1998. Base compositional bias and phylogenetic analyses: A test of the "flying DNA" hypothesis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10:408-416.
54. WADDELL, P. J., N. OKADA, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Towards resolving the interordinal relationships of placental mammals. Syst. Biol. 48:1-5.
55. WILSON, D. E., AND D. M. REEDER (eds.). 1993. Mammal species of the world. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
56. WYSS, A. R., AND J. J. FLYNN. 1993. A phylogenetic analysis and definition of the Carnivora. Pages 32-52 in Mammal phylogeny: Placentals (F. S. Szalay, M. J. Novacek, and M. C. McKenna, eds.). Springer-Verlag, New York.