Learning to collaborate in a peer-tutoring situation: Who learns? what is learned?

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 491-508

  Grossen, Michèle ^a   Bachmann, Karin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Collaborative work; Interaction analysis; Learning situation; Peer interactions; Peer tutoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034345652     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03172990     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen, L.A. (1976). Children as teachers. Theory and research on tutoring. New York: Academic Press.
2. Barnier, G. (1994). L'effet-tuteur dans une tâche spatiale chez des enfants d'âge scolaire. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence.
3. Bergmann, J. (1992). Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional sellings (pp. 137-162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Elbers, E. (1986). Interaction and instruction in the conservation experiment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1, 77-89.
5. Golay-Schilter, D., Perret, J.-F., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & De Guglielmo, F. (1999). Sociocognitive interactions in a computerised industrial task. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers (pp. 118-143). London, New York: Routledge.
6. Goodlad, S. (1995). Students as tutors and mentors. London: Kogan Page.
7. Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwill (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 1-42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Grossen. M., Iannaccone, A., Liengme, M.-J., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1996). Actual and perceived expertise: The role of social comparison in the mastery of right and left recognition in novice-expert dyads. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55, 176-187.
9. Grossen, M., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1994). Psycho-social perspective on cognitive development: Construction of adult-child intersubjectivity in logic tasks. In W. de Graaf & R. Maier (Eds.), Sociogenesis reexamined (pp. 243-260). New York: Springer.
10. Grossen, M., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Liengme Bessire, M.J. (1997). Construction de l'interaction et dynamique socio-cognitives. In M. Grossen & B. Py (Eds.), Pratiques sociales et médiations symboliques (pp. 221-247). Bern: Peter Lang.
11. Grossen, M., & Pochon, L.-O. (1997). Interactional perspective on the use of the computer and on the technological development of a new tool: The case of word processing. In L. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 265-287). New York: Springer.
12. Grossen, M., & Py., B. (Eds.). (1997). Pratiques sociales et médiations symboliques. Bern: Peter Lang.
13. King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer-tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 134-152.
14. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripherical participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaraction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Littleton, K., & Light, P. (1999). Learning with computers. London, New York: Routledge.
17. Marková, I., Graumann, C., & Foppa, K. (Eds.). (1995). Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Talk amongst teachers and learners. London: Multilingual Matters.
19. Mercer, N. (1998). Development through dialogue: A socio-cultural perspective on the process of being educated. In A.C. Quelhas & F. Pereira (Eds.), Cognition and context. Special issue of Analise Psicologica. Lisboa: Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada.
20. Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Perret, J.-F., & Bell, N. (1991). The social construction of meaning and cognitive activity in elementary school children. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Socially shared cognition (pp. 41-62). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Pontecorvo, C., Ajello, A.M., & Zucchermaglio, C. (1991). Discutendo si impara. Interazione sociale e conoscenza a scuola. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
22. Rommetveit, R. (1976). On the architecture of intersubjectivity. In L.H. Strickland, K.J. Gergen, & F.J. Aboud (Eds.), Social psychology in transition (pp. 163-175). New York: Plenum Press.
23. Schubauer-Leoni, M.L., & Grossen, M. (1993). Negotiating the meaning of questions in didactic and experimental contracts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 451-471.
24. Teasley, S.D. (1995). The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology, 31, 207-220.
25. Teasley, S.D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In C.B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning. Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361-384). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
26. Vion, R. (1992). La communication verbale. Analyse des interactions. Paris: Hachette.
27. Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1997). A dialogical framework for researching peer talk. In R. Wegerif & P. Scrimshaw (Eds.), Computers and talk in the primary classroom (pp. 49-61). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
28. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (1999). Language for the social construction of knowledge: Comparing classroom talk in Mexican preschools. Language and Education, 13, 133-150.