Effect of assessors expertise level on efficiency of warm-up for triangle tests

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 151-162

  Dacremont, C ^a   Sauvageot, F ^a   Duyen, T Ha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b Inst Natl Polytechnique de Hanoi   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034343920     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2000.tb00262.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. BARBARY, O., NOKANA, R., DELWICHE, J., CHAN, J. and O'MAHONY, M. 1993. Focus difference testing for the assessment of differences between orange juices made from orange concentrate. J. Sensory Studies 8, 43-67.
2. DACREMONT, C., ROGER, C. and SAUVAGEOT, F. 1998. Replicated triangle tests: effect of feed-back and product comparison on performance. J. Sensory Studies 13, 413-433.
3. DACREMONT, C. and SAUVAGEOT, F. 1997. Are replicate evaluations of triangle tests during a session good practice? Food Qual. Pref. 3, 367-372.
4. rd Ed., pp. 377-395, MacGraw Hill Co., New York.
5. ENNIS, D.M. and MULLEN, K. 1985. The effect of dimensionality on results from the triangular method. Chem. Senses 10, 605-608.
6. FRIJTERS, J.E.R. 1981. Expanded tables for conversion of proportion of correct responses (Pc) to the measure of sensory difference (d') for the triangular method and the 3-alternative forced choice procedure. J. Food Sci. 47, 139-143.
7. FRIJTERS, J.E.R., BLAUW, Y.H. and VERMAAT, S.H. 1982. Incidental training in the triangular method. Chem. Senses 7, 63-69.
8. MARKS, L.E. and WHEELER, M.E. 1998. Attention and the detectability of weak taste stimuli. Chem. Senses 23, 19-29.
9. McBRIDE, R.L. and LAING, D.G. 1979. Threshold determination by triangle testing: effects of judgmental procedure, positional bias and incidental training. Chem. Senses and Flav. 4, 319-326.
10. O'MAHONY, M. and GOLDSTEIN, L.R. 1986. Effectiveness of sensory difference tests: sequential sensitivity analysis for liquid food stimuli. J. Food Sci. 51, 1550-1553.
11. O'MAHONY, M., THIEME, U. and GOLDSTEIN, L.R. 1988. The warm-up effect as a means of increasing the discriminability of sensory difference tests. J. Food Sci. 53, 1848-1850.
12. ROUSSEAU, B. and O'MAHONY, M. 1997. Sensory difference tests: Thurstonian and SSA predictions for vanilla flavored yogurts. J. Sensory Studies 12, 127-146.
13. THIEME, U. and O'MAHONY, M. 1990. Modifications to sensory difference test protocols: The warmed up paired comparison, the single standard duo-trio and the A-not-A test modified for response bias. J. Sensory Studies 5, 159-176.