Are replicate evaluations of triangle tests during a session good practice?

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 8, Issue 5-6, 1997, Pages 367-372

  Dacremont, C ^a   Sauvageot, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031440414     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(97)00045-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brockhoff, P. M. (1995) Generalized linear models in sensometrics. 4ième Journées Européennes Agro-Industries et Méthodes Statistiques, 7-8 December, 1995, INRA, Dijon, pp. 33-47.
2. Dixon, W. and Massey, F. (1969) Introduction to Statistical Analysis, 3rd edn, pp. 377-394. Mac Graw Hill, New-York.
3. Ennis, D. M. and O'Mahony, M. (1995) Probabilistic models for sequential taste effects in triadic choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 1088-1097.
4. Frijters, J. E. R. (1977) The effect of duration of intervals between olfactory stimuli in the triangular method. Chemical Senses and Flavor 2, 301-311.
5. Frijters, J. E. R., Blauw, Y. H. and Vermaat, S. H. (1982) Incidental training in the triangular method. Chemical Senses 7, 63-69.
6. Harries, J. N. M. and Smith, G. L. (1981) The two factor triangle test. Journal of Food Technology 17, 153-162.
7. McBride, R, L. and Laing, D. G. (1979) Threshold determination by triangle testing: effect of judgmental procedure, positional bias and incidental training. Chemical Senses and Flavor 4, 319-326.
8. O'Mahony, M. (1988) Sensory difference and preference testing: the use of signal detection measures. In Applied Sensory Analysis of Food, Vol. 1, ed. H. Moskowitz, pp. 145-175. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
9. O'Mahony, M. (1995) Who told you the triangle test was simple? Food Quality and Preference 6, 227-238.
10. O'Mahony, M. and Goldstein, L. R. (1986) Effectiveness of sensory difference tests: sequential sensitivity analysis for liquid food stimuli. Journal of Food Science 51, 1550-1553.
11. O'Mahony, M. and Odebert, N. (1985) A comparison of sensory difference testing procedures: sequential sensitivity analysis and aspects of taste adaptation. Journal of Food Science 50, 1055-1058.
12. O'Mahony, M., Masuoka, S. and Ishii, R. (1994) A theoretical note on difference tests: models, paradoxes and cognitive strategies. Journal of Sensory Studies 9, 247-272.
13. O'Mahony, M., Thieme, U. and Goldstein, L. R. (1988) The warm-up effect as a means of increasing the discriminability of sensory difference tests. Journal of Food Science 53, 1848-1850.
14. Pfaffmann, C., Schlosberg, H. and Cornsweet, J. (1954) Variables affecting difference tests. In Food Acceptance Testing Methodology, pp. 4-17. Advisory Broard Quartermaster Research & Development, Committee on foods and Natl. Acad. Sci., Natl. Research Council, Chicago.
15. Priso, H. E., Danzart, M. and Hossenlopp, J. (1994) A statistical analysis of difference tests with replications. Journal of Sensory Studies 9, 121-130.
16. Smith, G. L. (1981) Statistical properties of simple sensory difference tests: confidence limits and significance tests. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 513-520.
17. Vié, A. and O'Mahony, M. (1989) Triangular difference testing: refinements of sequential sensitivity analysis for predictions for individual triads. Journal of Sensory Studies 4, 87-103.
18. Wasserman, A. E. and Talley, F. (1969) A sample bias in the evaluation of smoked frankfurters by the triangle test. Journal of Food Science 34, 99-100.