Viability in dynamic social networks

Journal of Mathematical Sociology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 175-192

  Bonneuil, Noël ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT NATIONAL D'ÉTUDES DÉMOGRAPHIQUES   (France)

^b ÉCOLE DES HAUTES ÉTUDES EN SCIENCES SOCIALES   (France)

Author keywords

Control theory; Dynamic social networks; Viability

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034341734     PISSN: 0022250X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.2000.9990235     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aubin, J.-P. (1991). Viability Theory. Boston, Basel: Birkhäuser.
2. Aubin, J.-P. (1996). Neural Networks and Qualitative Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Aubin, J.-P. (1997). Dynamic Economic Theory: A Viability Approach. Boston, Basel: Springer-Verlag Birkhäuser.
4. Aubin, J.-P. (1998). Connectionist complexity and its evolution, in Equations aux dérivées partielles et applications. Paris: Gauthier-Villars: 51-80.
5. Banks, D. L. and Carley K. M. (1996). Models for network evolution. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21(1-2): 173-196.
6. Doreian, P., Kapuscinski, R., Krackhardt D. and Szczypula, J. (1997). A brief history of balance through time, in Evolution of Social Networks, (edited by P. Doreian and F. N. Stokman), New York: Gordon & Breach.
7. Erickson, B. H. (1997). Social networks and history, A review essay. Historical Methods, 30(3): 149-157.
8. Freeman, L. (1979). Centrality of social networks. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1: 215-239.
9. Holland, P. W. and Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76: 33-65.
10. Kent (1978). The rise of the Medici: Faction in Florence, 1426-1434. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Leenders, R. Th. A. J. (1996). Evolution of friendship and best friendship choices. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21(1-2): 133-148.
12. Leenders, R. Th. A. J. (1995). Models for network dynamics: a Markovian framework. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 20(1): 1-21.
13. Mahoney, J. (1999). Nominal, Ordinal, and Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 104(4): 1154-96.
14. Padgett, J. F. and Ansell, C. K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1259-1319.
15. Ridgeway, C. L. and Balkwell, J. W. (1997). Group processes and the diffusion of status beliefs. Social Psychology Quaterly, 60-1: 14-31.
16. Sampson, S. F. (1969). Crisis in a cloister #69-5775. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor Sci. Publ., Ann Arbor, MI.
17. Skvoretz, J., Faust K. and Fararo, T. J. (1996). Social Structure, networks and E-state structuralism models. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21(1-2): 57-76.
18. Stokman, F. N. and Zeggelink, E. P. H. (1996). Is politics power or policy oriented? A comparative analysis of dynamic access models in policy networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21(1-2): 77-111.
19. White, H. C., Boorman, S. and Breiger, R. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4): 730-780.
20. Yamaguchi, K. (1996). Power in networks of substitutable and complementary exchange relations: a rational-choice model and an analysis of power centralization. American Sociological Review, 61 April: 308-332.