Social structure, networks, and E-state structuralism models

Journal of Mathematical Sociology

Volumn 21, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 57-76

  Skvoretz, John ^a   Faust, Katherine ^a   Fararo, Thomas J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000865347     PISSN: 0022250X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.1996.9990174     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Balkwell, J. W. (1991) Status characteristics and social interaction: Assessment of theoretical variants. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway and H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes 8: 135-176, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., Snell, J. L., and Zelditch, Jr., M. (1962) Types of Formalization in Small Group Research, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
3. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., and Zelditch, Jr., M. (1966) Status characteristics and expectation states. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., and B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress 1: 29-46, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
4. Berger, J., Wagner, D. G., and Zelditch, Jr., M. (1985) Introduction: Expectation states theory: Review and assessment. In J. Berger and M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status, Rewards, and Influence, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Chase, I. (1982) Dynamics of hierarchy formation: The sequential development of dominance relationships. Behavior 80: 218-240.
6. _. (1974) Models of hierarchy formation in animal societies. Behavioral Science 19: 374-382.
7. Fararo, T. J. (1989) The Meaning of General Theoretical Sociology, New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Fararo, T. J., and Skvoretz, J. (1986) E-state structuralism: A theoretical method. American Sociological Review 51: 591-602.
9. Fararo, T. J., Skvoretz, J., and Kosaka, K. (1994) Advances in E-state structuralism: Further studies in dominance structure formation. Social Networks 16: 233-265.
10. Freeman, L. C. (1989) Social networks and the structure experiment. In L. C. Freeman, D. R. White and A. K. Romney (Eds.), Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, Fairfax, VA: George Mason, 11-40.
11. Freeman, L. C., Freeman, S. C., and Romney, A. K. (1992) The implication of social structure for dominance hierarchies in red deer, Cervus elaphus L. Animal Behaviour 44: 239-245.
12. Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual, New York: Doubleday.
13. Harary, F., and Palmer, E. M. (1973) Graphical Enumeration, New York: Academic Press.
14. Holland, P. W., and Leinhardt, S. (1970) A method of detecting structure in sociometric data. American Journal of Sociology 76: 492-513.
15. _ (1976) Local structure in social networks. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological Methodology - 1976, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1-45.
16. _ (1979) Structural sociometry. In P. W. Holland and S. Leinhardt (Eds.), Perspectives on Social Network Research, New York: Academic Press, 63-83.
17. Homans, G. C. (1950) The Human Group, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
18. Hurwitz, J. I., Zander, A. F., and Hymovitch, B. (1953) Some effects of power on the relations among group members. In D. Cartwright and A. F. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Co., 483-492.
19. Lorrain, F., and White, H. C. (1971) Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1: 49-80.
20. Mazur, A. (1973) A cross-species comparison of status in small established groups. American Sociological Review 38: 513-530.
21. Nadel, S. F. (1957) The Theory of Social Structure, London: Cohen and West Ltd.
22. Skvoretz, J. (1990) Biased net theory: Simulations, approximations and observations. Social Networks 12: 217-238.
23. Skvoretz, J., and Fararo, T. J. (forthcoming) Status and participation in task groups: A dynamic model. American Journal of Sociology (forthcoming).
24. Skvoretz, J., and Willer, D. (1993) Exclusion and power: A test of four theories of power in exchange networks. American Sociological Review 58: 801-818.
25. Snijders, T. A. B. (1991) Enumeration and simulation methods for 0-1 matrices with given marginals. Psychometrika 56: 397-417.
26. _ (1996) Stochastic actor-oriented dynamic network models. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 21: 149-172.
27. Strodtbeck, F. L., James, R. M., and Hawkins, C. (1957) Social status in jury deliberations. American Sociological Review 22: 713-719.
28. Strodtbeck, F. L., and Mann, R. D. (1956) Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry 19: 3-11.
29. Torrance, E. P. (1954) Some consequences of power differences on decision making in permanent and temporary three-man groups. Research Studies, State College of Washington 22: 130-140.
30. Walker, M. E., and Wasserman, S. S. (1988) Triads PC Network Analysis Package for Assessing Local Structure: User Manual, University of Illinois.
31. Wasserman, S. S., and Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Webster, Jr., M., and Foschi, M. (Eds.) (1988) Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33. Zeggelink, E. (1993) Strangers into Friends: The Evolution of Friendship Networks Using an Individual Oriented Modeling Approach, Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.