Civic Engagement in the Era of Big Stories

Political Communication

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 377-382

  Lawrence, Regina G ^a   Bennett, W Lance ^b  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Civic engagement; Clinton; Deliberation; Impeachment scandal; Journalism; Lewinsky; News saga; Tabloid media

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034341714     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584600050178988     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bennett, W. L. (1996). News: The politics of illusion (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
2. Broder, D., & Morin, R. (1998, December 27). Struggle over new standards. Washington Post, p. A1.
3. Cook, T. E. (1996). Afterword: Political values and production values. Political Communication, 13, 469-481.
4. Dahlgren, P. (1988). What’s the meaning of this? Viewers’ plural sense-making of TV news. Media, Culture, and Society, 10, 285-301.
5. Darnton, R. (1975). Writing news and telling stories. Daedalus, 2, 175-194.
6. Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Fishkin, J. S. (1995). The voice of the people. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8. Gabler, N. (1998). Life the movie: How entertainment conquered reality. New York: Knopf.
9. Gamson, W. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Jacobsen, G. C. (1999). Impeachment politics in the 1998 congressional elections. Political Science Quarterly, 114, 31-51.
11. Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361-385.
12. Lawrence, R. G., Bennett, W. L., & Hunt, V. (1999, September). Toward a fuller model of mediated political communication: Public engagement with the Lewinsky scandal. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
13. Lehrer, J. (1999, Summer). Blurring the lines hurts journalism. Nieman Reports, pp. 60-61.
14. Peters, J. D. (1995). Historical tensions in the concept of public opinion. In T. L. Glasser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 3-32). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Pew Center for the People and the Press. (1998). Event-driven audiences: Internet news takes off. Available URL: http://www.people-press.org/ned98rpt.htm
16. Sapiro, V., & Soss, J. (1999). Spectacular politics, dramatic interpretations: Multiple meanings in the Thomas/Hill hearings. Political Communication, 16, 285-314.
17. Shah, D. V., Domke, D., Watts, M. D., & Fan, D. P. (2000, August). Media cue-taking and trends in mass opinion: Explaining evaluations of Clinton’s competency and integrity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Phoenix, AZ.
18. Silva, C. L., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Waterman, R. A. (1999, September). The economy, the independent counsel, and the politics of impeachment. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
19. Sonner, M. W., & Wilcox, C. (1999, September). Forgiving and forgetting: Public support for Bill Clinton during the Lewinsky scandal. PS, pp. 554-557.
20. Williams, B. A., & Delli Carpini, M. (2000, April). Unchained reaction: The collapse of media gatekeeping and the Lewinsky-Clinton scandal. Journalism: Theory, Practice, and Criticism, 1, 61-85.
21. Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgment. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
22. Zaller, J. (1998, June). Monica Lewinsky’s contribution to political science. PS, pp. 182-188.