Toward international settlement reform: FCC benchmarks versus ITU rates

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 24, Issue 10-11, 2000, Pages 843-863

  Stanley, Kenneth B ^a  

^a FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEES AND CHARGES; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; MARKETING; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

SETTLEMENT RATES;

TELEPHONE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0034323752     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00071-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abelson, D. (2000). Accounting rate reform and global infrastructure buildout. International Telecoms Review 2000, 53-57 Euromoney.
2. Alleman, J., Rappoport, P., & Stanley, K. B. (1989). Alternative settlement procedures in international telecommunications service. In D. Elixmann & K.-H. Neumann (Eds.), Communications policy in Europe. Berlin: Springer.
3. Alleman, J., & Sorce, B. (1997). International settlements: A time for change. Proceedings of the global networking '97 conference, June.
4. Cowhey P. FCC benchmarks and the reform of the international telecommunications market. Telecommunications Policy. 22(11):1998;899-911.
5. Ende A.H. International communications. Federal Communications Bar Journal. 28:1975;147-178.
6. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (1989). Policy and rules concerning rates for dominant carriers, 4 FCC Rcd 2873.
7. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (1992). Calling prices for international message telephone service between the United States and other countries, October.
8. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (1996a). International settlement rates notice of proposed rulemaking, 96-484.
9. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (1996b). Motion of AT&T Corp. to be declared non-dominant for international service, 11 FCC Rcd 17963.
10. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (1997). International settlement rates report and order (benchmarks order), 12 FCC Rcd 19806.
11. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (1999). Biennial review report and order on reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 7963.
12. Ford, G. S. (2000). Flow-through and competition in the international message telephone service market, unpublished monograph.
13. Galbi D.A. Distinctive arrangements for international interconnection? Telecommunications Policy. 22(11):1998;945-951.
14. Harris, S. B. (1996). The settlement rate rip-off. Telecommunications Week International, 16 December.
15. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (1999a). Direction of traffic trading telecom minutes, Geneva.
16. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (1999b). World telecommunication development report, Geneva.
17. Madden, G., & Savage, S. J. (1999). Market structure, competition and pricing in United States international telephone services market, unpublished monograph.
18. Melody W.H. Telecom myths. The international revenue settlements subsidy Telecommunications Policy. 24(1):2000;51-61.
19. Peters, P., & Donavan, S., (1998). InfoAmericas 2000. A telecom scorecard: Consumer costs for basic services in the Americas.
20. Spiwak L.J. From international competitive carrier to the WTO. A survey of the FCC's international telecommunications policy initiatives 1985-1998 Federal Communications Law Journal. 51:1999;111-226.
21. Stanley, K. B. (1981). International common carrier communications: Has the FCC effectively regulated investment, earnings, and price? In H. M. Trebing (Ed.), Energy and communications in transition. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
22. Stanley, K. B. (1997). International settlements in a changing global telecom market. In W. H. Melody (Ed.), Telecom reform: Principles, policies and regulatory practices. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.
23. Stanley K.B. Balance of payments deficits and subsidies in international telecommunications. A new challenge to regulation Administrative Law Review. 43(3):1991;411-438.
24. Sullivan, M. (1997). Why is the United States whining about its own creation? Communications Week International, 20 January.
25. Thuswaldner A. International telephony revenue settlement reform. Telecommunications Policy. 22(8):1998;681-696.
26. Thuswaldner A. The international revenue settlement debate. Telecommunications Policy. 24(1):2000;31-50.
27. Trebing H., Estabrooks M. The globalization of telecommunications. A study in the struggle to control markets and technology Journal of Economic Issues. 29(2):1995;535-544.
28. Trotti M.A.R. Charging and accounting in the international telephone service. A developing country's point of view Telecommunication Journal. 60(11):1993;11-17.
29. Utsumi Y. Moving beyond international accounting rates. Telecommunications Policy. 24(1):1999;5-8.
30. Wright J. International telecommunications, settlement rates, and the FCC. Journal of Regulatory Economics. 15:1999;1-29.