Telecom myths: the international revenue settlements subsidy

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 51-61

  Melody, W H ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC;

ACCOUNTING RATE; INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION; NET SETTLEMENT; REVENUE SETTLEMENT;

TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

EID: 0033904950     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-5961(99)00070-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cave M., Waverman L. The future of international settlements. Telecommunications Policy. 22:1998;11.
2. Cowhey P. FCC benchmarks and the reform of the international telecommunications market. Telecommunications Policy. 22:1998;11.
3. Federal Communications Commission (FCC), (1997). International settlement rates report and order, 97-280, August.
4. Federal Communications Commission (FCC), (1999). 16th order on reconsideration. CC Docket No. 96-45, October 8.
5. Gabel R. Development of separations principles in the telephone industry. 1967;Michigan State University, East Lansing.
6. Galbi D.A. Distinctive arrangements for international interconnection? Telecommunications Policy. 22:1998;11.
7. Harris, S. (1996). The settlement rate rip-off. Communications Week International. 16 December.
8. International Telecommunications Union (ITU) (1997). Transforming economic relationships in international telecommunications, Chairman's Report of the Seventh Regulatory Colloquium, Geneva, 3-5 December.
9. Kelly, T. (1997). Ten propositions for accounting rate reform. Paper presented at ITU Asia Telecom 1997, Tariff Workshop, 13 June.
10. Rogerson, W. & Kwerel, E. (1999). A proposal for universal service and access reform. CC Docket No. 96-45 and CC Docket No. 96-262. Filed May 27.
11. Sullivan, M. (1997). Why is the United States whining about its own creation? Communications Week International, 20 January.
12. Telecommunications Policy, (1998). Special issue: International revenue settlements, 22(11).
13. Thuswaldner, A. (1998). International telephony revenue settlement reform. Telecommunications Policy 22(8), September.
14. Thuswaldner, A. (2000). The international revenue settlement debate. Telecommunications Policy 24(1), February (this issue).
15. Tyler, M. (1997). Transforming economic relationships in international telecommunications: Briefing Report. Prepared for ITU Regulatory Colloquium No. 7. Geneva.
16. United States Telephone Association (USTA) (1999). Comments of USTA on the further notice of proposed rulemaking. CC Docket No. 96-45 and CC Docket No. 96-262. Filed July 23.
17. Ure, J. (2000). The era of international simple resale: Not waving but drowning? Telecommunications Policy 24(1), 9-30.
18. Utsumi, Y. (2000). Moving beyond international accounting rates. Telecommunications Policy 24(1), February 5-8.
19. Withers, W. J., (1999). Enlightening the international settlement house, in Issues in telecommunications development: Reforming the international accounting rate system. 1st Edition, vol. II (I), ITU, BDT. May.