Is good-time appropriate for offenders on electronic monitoring? Attitudes of electronic monitoring directors

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 497-506

  Payne, Brian K ^a   Gainey, Randy R ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034311847     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2352(00)00065-9     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allen, G. (1995). The courage of our convictions: The abolition of parole will save lives and money. Policy Rev 72, 4-7.
2. Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 2nd Edn. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Brown, M. P., & Elrod, P. (1995). Electronic house arrest: An examination of citizen attitudes. Crime Delinquency 41, 332-346.
4. Cadigan, T. P. (1991). Electronic monitoring in federal pretrial release. Fed Probation 55, 26-30.
5. Chayet, E. F. (1994). Correctional 'good-time' as a means of early release. Crim Justice Abstr 26, 521-538.
6. Clear, T. R., & Cole, G. F. (1996). American Corrections. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7. Cohn, A. (1996). The evaluation of electronic-monitoring programs. Perspectives 8 (Fall), 28-35.
8. Colson, C., & Van Ness, D. (1989). Alternatives to incarceration: A conservative perspective. J State Gov 62, 59-64.
9. Cooprider, K. W. (1992). Pretrial bond supervision: An empirical analysis with policy implications. Fed Probation 56, 41-49.
10. Cooprider, K. W., & Kerby, J. (1990). A practical application of electronic monitoring at the pretrial stage. Fed Probation 54, 28-35.
11. Crouch, B. M. (1993). Is incarceration really worse: Analysis of offenders' preferences for prison over probation. Justice Q 10, 67-88.
12. Dillingham, S. D., Montgomery, R. H., & Tabor, R. W. (1990). Probation and Parole in Practice, 2nd Edn. Cincinnati: Anderson.
13. Durkheim, E. (1964). Division of Labor in Society (G. Simpson Translator). New York: Free Press.
14. Flanagan, T. J., & Longmire, D. R. (1996). American's View Crime and Justice: A National Public Opinion Survey. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
15. General Assembly of Virginia, House. (1998). A Bill to Amend and Reenact 53.1-116 of the Code of Virginia, Relating to Good Conduct Credit (H.B. 1129) February 17.
16. Hoffman, P. B. (1997). History of the federal parole system. Fed Probation 61, 49-57.
17. Inciardi, J. (1996). Criminal Justice, 5th Edn. New York: Harcourt Brace.
18. Kuplinski, J. R. (1990). Electronic Offender Monitoring in Virginia: Evaluation Report. Richmond, VA: Department of Criminal Justice Services.
19. Lane, M. P. (1986). A case for early release. Crime Delinquency 32, 399-403.
20. Larivee, J. J. (1993). Community programs: A risky business. Correct Today 55, 20-24.
21. Lilly, J. R. (1989). What about house arrest. J State Gov 62, 89-91.
22. Maineprize, S. (1992). Electronic monitoring in corrections: Assessing cost effectiveness and the potential for widening the net of social control. Can J Criminal 34, 161-180.
23. Maxfield, M. J., & Baumer, T. L. (1990). Home detention with electronic monitoring. Crime Delinquency 36, 521-536.
24. Morse, J. (1995). Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
25. Parisi, N., & Zillo, J. A. (1983). Good time: The forgotten issue. Crime Delinquency 29, 228-237.
26. Payne, B. K., & Gainey, R. R. (1998). A qualitative assessment of the pains experienced on electronic monitoring. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 42, 149-163.
27. Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994a). What punishes? Inmates rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. Fed Probation 58, 3-8.
28. Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994b). Perceptions of punishment: Inmates and staff rank severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. Prison J 74, 306-329.
29. Rackmill, S. J. (1994). An analysis of home confinement as a sanction. Fed Probation 58, 45-52.
30. Renzema, M. (1992). The Electronic Monitoring Primer. Mechanicsburg, PA: Tracking Systems.
31. Renzema, M., & Skeleton, D. (1991). The scope of electronic monitoring today. J Offender Monit 4, 6-11.
32. Ross, R. R., & Barker, T. (1988). Prison remission systems: Incentive or disincentive? Crimcare J 4, 111-131.
33. Schmidt, A. K. (1991). Electronic monitors: Realistically, what can be expected? Fed Probation 55, 47-53.
34. Sigler, R. T., & Lamb, D. (1995). Community-based alternatives to prison: How the public and court personnel view them. Fed Probation 59, 3-9.
35. Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing Matters. New York: Oxford Press.
36. Tonry, M. (1997). Intermediate Sanctions in Sentencing Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
37. Virginia State Crime Commission. (1998). The Use of Home Electronic Monitoring in Virginia: House Document Number 66. Richmond, VA: Commonwealth of Virginia.
38. Walker, J. L. (1990). Sharing the credit, sharing the blame: Managing political risks in electronically monitored house arrest. Fed Probation 54, 16-20.
39. Weisburd, D., & Chayet, E. (1989). Good time: An agenda for research. Crim Justice Behav 16, 183-195.
40. Winfree, T. L. (1990). Parole survival and legislated change. Justice Q 7, 151-173.