Does a multi-disciplinary health degree provide a satisfactory post-registration course for nurses? A follow-up survey of health science studies graduates

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 613-619

  Brown, S Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034311425     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/nedt.2000.0481     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Altschul A. Why higher education for nurses? Issues and developments. Nurse Education Today. 7:1987;10-16.
2. Andrew S. H. The relevance of post-basic courses to graduate nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 9:1984;89-101.
3. Armitage S. Research utilisation in practice. Nurse Education Today. 10:1990;10-15.
4. Banks B. E. C. An uncompromising view of nurse education today, England, 1995. Nurse Education Today. 15:1995;315-316.
5. Barriball K. L., While A. E., Norman I. J. Continuing professional education for nurses: a review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 17:1992;1129-1140.
6. Basford L. Shared learning: a phenomena for celebration and a challenge to health educators. Nurse Education Today. 19:1999;345-346.
7. Bircumshaw D. How can we compare graduate and non-graduate nurses? A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 14:1989;438-443.
8. Bircumshaw D., Chapman C. M. A follow-up study of the graduates of the Cardiff Bachelor of Nursing degree course. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 13:1988;273-279.
9. Carlisle C. Post-registration degrees in nursing: a time for evaluation. Nurse Education Today. 11:1991;295-302.
10. Clark C. The university contribution to professional education. Nurse Education Today. 7:1987;17-20.
11. Draper P. What are the implications of integration for nursing research and nursing education? Nurse Education Today. 16:1996;239-240.
12. Ferguson A. Evaluating the purpose and benefits of continuing education in nursing and the implications for the continuing education of cancer nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 19:1994;640-646.
13. Fraser M., Titherington R. Where are they now? The career paths of graduates from post-registration degrees in nursing in England. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 28:1991;257-265.
14. Kemp J. Graduates in nursing: a report of a longitudinal study at the University of Hull. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 13:1988;281-287.
15. Myco F. Experiences in the provision of degree courses for registered nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 9:1984;95-101.
16. Owen G. M. For better, for worse: nursing in Higher Education. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 13:1988;3-13.
17. Pelletier D., Duffield C., Gallaher R., Soars S., Donohue A., Adams A. The effects of graduate nurse education on clinical practice and career paths: a pilot study. Nurse Education Today. 14:1994;314-332.
18. Rafferty A. M., Allcock M., Lathlean J. The theory/practice gap. Taking issue with the issue. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 23:1996;685-689.
19. Reid N. G., Nellis P., Boore J. Graduate nurses in Northern Ireland: their career paths, aspirations and problems. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 24:1987;215-225.
20. Rushford H., Ireland L. Fit for whose purpose? The contextual forces underpinning the provision of nurse education in the UK. Nurse Education Today. 17:1997;437-441.
21. Scott-Wright M. Trends in transatlantic nursing: recent and prospective. Nurse Education Today. 7:1987;148-157.
22. Sinclair H. Graduate nurses in the UK: myth and reality. Nurse Education Today. 7:1987;24-29.
23. Smith L. Academic standards in nursing. Nurse Education Today. 14:1994;351-353.
24. Smith L. A follow-up study of the Bachelor of nursing graduates 1982-90, University of Glasgow, Scotland. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 18:1993;1840-1848.
25. Thompson D. Competition and collaboration in higher education healthcare. Nurse Education Today. 7:1987;21-23.
26. Wong S. Selection and presentation of curricular content and student satisfaction in post-basic degree programmes in the UK. Nurse Education Today. 8:1988;148-159.