Near, far, or in between? - Target edges and the transport component of prehension

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 90-93

  Servos, Philip ^a   Jakobson, Lorna S ^b   Goodale, Melvyn A ^c  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Grasping; Limb movements; Prehension; Visually guided reaching; Visuomotor behavior

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINETICS; LIMB MOVEMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 2642693712     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222899809601325     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Carlton L. G. (1992). Visual processing time and the control of movement. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp 3-31). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2. Castiello, U., Bennett, K. M., & Stelmach, G. E. (1993). Reach to grasp: The natural response to perturbation of object size. Experimental Brain Research, 94, 163-178.
3. Gentilucci, M., Castiello, U., Corradini, M. L., Scarpa, M., Umilta, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1991). Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements. Neuropsychologia, 29, 361-378.
4. Goodale, M. A., Meenan, J.-P., Bülthoff, H. H., Nicolle, D. A., Murphy, K., & Racicot, C. I. (1994). Separate neural pathways for the analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, 4, 604-610.
5. Jakobson, L. S., & Goodale, M. A. (1991). Factors influencing higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 199-208.
6. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
8. Marteniuk, R. G., Leavitt, J. L., MacKenzie, C. L., & Athenes, S. (1990). Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Human Movement Science, 9, 149-176.
9. Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., Jeannerod, M., Athenes, S., & Dugas, C. (1987). Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 365-378.
10. Paulignan, Y., Jeannerod, M., MacKenzie, C. L., & Marteniuk, R. G. (1991). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size. Experimental Brain Research, 87, 407-420.
11. Prablanc, C., Echallier, J. F., Komilis, E., & Jeannerod, M. (1979). Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. I. Spatio-temporal characteristics of eye and hand movements and their relationships when varying the amount of visual information. Biological Cybernetics, 35, 113-124.
12. Servos, P., & Goodale, M. A. (1994). Binocular vision and the online control of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 119-127.
13. Servos, P., Goodale, M. A., & Jakobson, L. S. (1992). The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Research, 32, 1513-1521.