Andreev peaks and massive magnons in cuprate superconductor-normal-superconductor junctions

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 85, Issue 16, 2000, Pages 3480-3483

  Auerbach, Assa ^a   Altman, Ehud ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ELECTRON TUNNELING; ENERGY GAP; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NEUTRON SCATTERING; OXIDE SUPERCONDUCTORS;

ANDREEV PEAKS; COOPER PAIR BREAKING; CUPRATE SUPERCONDUCTOR NORMAL SUPERCONDUCTOR JUNCTIONS; MASSIVE MAGNONS;

JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICES;

EID: 0034300559     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3480     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. G. Deutscher, Nature (London) 397, 40 (1999).
2. L. Ozyuzer, J. F. Zasadzinski, and N. Miyakawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 29-31, 3721 (1999).
3. H. Alloul, T. Ohno, and P. Y. Mendels, Phys. Rev Lett. 63, 1700 (1989).
4. H. Ding et al., Nature (London) 382, 51 054 (1996); A. G. Loeser et al., Science 273, 325 (1996).
5. H. Ding et al., Nature (London) 382, 51 054 (1996); A. G. Loeser et al., Science 273, 325 (1996).
6. O. Nesher and G. Koren, Phys. Rev. B 60, 9287 (1999).
7. T. M. Klapwijk, G. E. Blonder, and M. Tinkham, Physica (Amsterdam) 109B & 110B, 1657-1664 (1982); M. Octavio, M. Tinkham, G. E. Blonder, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6739 (1983).
8. T. M. Klapwijk, G. E. Blonder, and M. Tinkham, Physica (Amsterdam) 109B & 110B, 1657-1664 (1982); M. Octavio, M. Tinkham, G. E. Blonder, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6739 (1983).
9. D. Racah and G. Deutscher, Physica (Amsterdam) 2637C, 218-224 (1996).
10. R. S. Decca, H. D. Drew, E. Osquiguil, B. Mairov, and J. Guimpel, cond-mat/0003213.
11. S.-C. Zhang, J.-P. Hu, E. Arrigoni, W. Hanke, and A. Auerbach, Phys. Rev. B 60, 13 070 (1999).
12. Y. Bazaliy, E. Demler, and S. C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1921-1925 (1997).
13. Ar. Abanov and A. V. Chubukov, Phys. Rev. B 61, R9241 (2000).
14. Y. J. Uemura, Physica (Amsterdam) 282C-287C, 194-197 (1997); 235, 1196 (1987).
15. Y. J. Uemura, Physica (Amsterdam) 282C-287C, 194-197 (1997); 235, 1196 (1987).
16. V. J. Emery and S. A. Kivelson, Nature (London) 374, 434-437 (1995).
17. H. F. Fong et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 713 (1997); cond-mat/9910041.
18. int and emerges in the classical approximation. This is the crucial difference between the pSO(5) theory and the earlier weak coupling SO(5) theory of S.-C. Zhang, Science 275, 1089-1096 (1997).
19. P. W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987).
20. M. Havilio and A. Auerbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4848-4851 (1999).
21. G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Plenum, New York, 1986), Ch. 9.3.
22. P. Dieleman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3486 (1997).
23. J. C. Cuevas, A. Martin-Rodero, and A. Levy Yeyati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4086 (1999), and references therein.