Selecting examples for partial memory learning

Machine Learning

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 27-52

  Maloof, Marcus A ^a   Michalski, Ryszard S ^b,c  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION THEORY; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ONLINE CONCEPT LEARNING; PARTIAL MEMORY LEARNING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0034299906     PISSN: 08856125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007661119649     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aha, D., Kibler, D., & Albert, M. (1991). Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 6, 37-66.
2. Baim, P. (1988). A method for attribute selection in inductive learning systems. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 10(6), 888-896.
3. Blake, C., Keogh, E., & Merz, C. (1998). UCI repository of machine learning databases [On-line]. Department of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine. Available: http://www. ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/mlrepository.html
4. Bloedorn, E. & Michalski, R. (1998). Data-driven constructive induction. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(2), 30-37.
5. Bloedorn, E., Wnek, J., Michalski, R., & Kaufman, K. (1993). AQ-17 - A multistrategy learning system: The method and user's guide. Reports of the Machine Learning and Inference Laboratory MLI93-12. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
6. Clark, P. & Niblett, T. (1989). The CN2 induction algorithm. Machine Learning, 3, 261-284.
7. Davis, J. (1981). CONVART: A program for constructive induction on time dependent data. Master's Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
8. Elio, R. & Watanabe, L. (1991). An incremental deductive strategy for controlling constructive induction in learning from examples. Machine Learning, 7, 7-44.
9. Fisher, R. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7, 179-188.
10. Frisch, A. (1995). Essential system administration (2nd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly & Associates.
11. Iba, W., Woogulis, J., & Langley, P. (1988). Trading simplicity and coverage in incremental concept learning. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 73-79). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
12. Kaufman, K. & Michalski, R. (1998). AQ-18: An environment for learning and natural induction. Reports of the Machine Learning and Inference Laboratory MLI 98-12. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
13. Kerber, R. (1992). ChiMerge: discretization of numeric attributes. In Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 123-128). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
14. Kibler, D. & Langley, P. (1990). Machine learning as an experimental science. In Dietterich, T. & Shavlik, J. (Eds.), Readings in Machine Learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
15. Krizakova, I. & Kubat, M. (1992). FAVORIT: Concept formation with ageing of knowledge. Pattern Recognition Letters, 13, 19-25.
16. Kubat, M. & Krizakova, I. (1992). Forgetting and aging of knowledge in concept formation. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 6, 195-206.
17. Lebowitz, M. (1987). Experiments with incremental concept formation: UNIMEM. Machine Learning, 2, 103-138.
18. Littlestone, N. (1991). Redundant noisy attributes, attribute errors, and linear-threshold learning using Winnow. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory (pp. 147-156). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
19. Maloof, M. (1996). Progressive partial memory learning. Doctoral Dissertation, School of Information Technology and Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
20. Maloof, M., Duric, Z., Michalski, R., & Rosenfeld, A. (1996). Recognizing blasting caps in X-ray images. In Proceedings of the Image Understanding Workshop (pp. 1257-1261). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
21. Maloof, M. & Michalski, R. (1995). A method for partial-memory incremental learning and its application to computer intrusion detection. In Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (pp. 392-397). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
22. Maloof, M. & Michalski, R. (1997). Learning symbolic descriptions of shape for object recognition in X-ray images. Expert Systems with Applications, 12(1), 11-20.
23. Michalski, R. (1969). On the quasi-minimal solution of the general covering problem. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Information Processing, Vol. A3 (pp. 125-128).
24. Michalski, R. (1980). Pattern recognition as rule-guided inductive inference. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2(4), 349-361.
25. Michalski, R. (1983). A theory and methodology of inductive learning. In Michalski, R., Carbonell, J., & Mitchell, T. (Eds.), Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. 1. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
26. 1 hypotheses: The underlying methodology and the description of program AQ-11. Technical report UIUCDCS-F-83-905, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
27. Quinlan, J. (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
28. Reinke, R. & Michalski, R. (1988). Incremental learning of concept descriptions: A method and experimental results. In Hayes, J., Michie, D., & Richards, J. (Eds.), Machine Intelligence 11. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29. Salganicoff, M. (1993). Density-adaptive learning and forgetting. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 276-283). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
30. Schlimmer, J. & Granger, R. (1986). Beyond incremental processing: Tracking concept drift. In Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 502-507). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
31. Utgoff, P. (1988). ID5: An incremental ID3. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 107-120). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
32. Watanabe, L. & Elio, R. (1987). Guiding constructive induction for incremental learning from examples. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 293-296). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
33. Widmer, G. (1997). Tracking context changes through meta-learning. Machine Learning, 27, 259-286.
34. Widmer, G. & Kubat, M. (1996). Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts. Machine Learning, 23, 69-101.
35. Wnek, J., Kaufman, K., Bloedorn, E., & Michalski, R. (1995). Selective induction learning system AQ-15c: The method and user's guide. Reports of the Machine Learning and Inference Laboratory MLI 95-4. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.