Variability in recording and grading the need for orthodontic treatment using the handicapping malocclusion assessment record, occlusal index and dental aesthetic index

Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 222-224

  Otuyemi, O D ^a   Noar, J H ^a  

^a MOUNT VERNON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Malocclusion; Recording and grading; Summers' Occlusal Index

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL CARE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; MEDICAL RECORD; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL RECORDS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0030155411     PISSN: 03015661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00846.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. DRAKER HL. Handicapping labio-lingual deviations: a proposed index for public health purposes. Am J Orthod 1960; 46: 295-305.
2. GRAINGER RM. Orthodontic treatment priority index. Public Health Services Publication No. 1000, Series 2, No. 25. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C., 1967.
3. SALZMANN JA. Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priority. Am J Orthod 1968; 54: 749-65.
4. SUMMERS CJ. The occlusal index: A system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. Am J Orthod 1971; 59: 552-67.
5. BROOK PH, SHAW WC. The development of an orthodontic treatment priority index. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11: 309-20.
6. HOWITT JW, STRICKER G. HENDRSON R. Eastman esthetic index. New York State Dent J 1967; 33: 215-20.
7. BANACK AR, CLEALL JF, YIP ASG. Epidemiology of malocclusion in 12 year old Winnipeg school children. J Canad Dent Assoc 1972, 12: 437-55.
8. EVANS R. SHAW WC. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 1987; 9: 314-8.
9. SHAW WC, RICHMOND S, O'BRIEN KD, BROOK PH. Quality control in orthodontics. Indices oftreatment need and treatment standards. Br Dent J 1991; 770: 107-12.
10. BAUME LJ, MARECHAUX S. Uniform methods for the epidemiologic assessment of malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1974: 66: 121-129.
11. MCLAIN JB, PROFFIT WR. Oral health status in the United States: prevalence of malocclusion. J Dent Educ 1985; 49: 386-96.
12. STRICKER G, CLIFFORD E, COHEN LK, GIDDON DB, MESKIN LH, EVANS CA. Psychosocial aspects of craniofacial disfigurement. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 410-422.
13. SHAW WC, MEEK SC, JONES DS. Nicknames, teasing, harassment and the salience of dental features amongst school children. Br J Orthod 1980; 7: 75-80.
14. PICKERING EA, VIG P. The occlusal index to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1975; 2: 47-51.
15. ELDERTON RJ, CLARK JD. Orthodontic treatment in the general dental service for assessed by the occlusal index. Br J Orthod 1983; 10: 178-86.
16. TANG ELK, WEI SHY. Assessing treatment effectiveness of removable and fixed appliances with the occlusal index. Am J Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98: 550-6.
17. JENNY J, CONS NC, KOHOUT FJ, JAKOBSEN J. Predicting handicapping malocclusion using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). Int Dent J 1993; 43: 128-132.
18. ANSAI T, MIYAZAKI H, KATOH Y, YAMASHITA T, JENNY J, CONS NC. Prevalence of malocclusion in high school students in Japan according to the Dental Aesthetic Index. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 303-5.
19. LOBB WK, ISMAIL AI, ANDREWS CL, SPRACKLIN TE. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment using the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Dentofac Orthop 1994; 106: 70-5.
20. WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION. International Collaborative study of oral health outcomes (ICS II), document 2-oral data collection instrument and examination criteria. Geneva: WHO.1989; 13-27.
21. JENNY J, CONNS NC. Guidelines for using the DAI. A supplement to (DAI) the Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa City. Iowa USA. 1988.
22. JARVINAN S, VAATAJA D. Variability in assessment of need for orthodontic treatment when using certain treatment need indices. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987; 15: 245-8.