Accuracy of three speech recognition systems: Case study of dysarthric speech

AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 186-196

  Hux, Karen ^a   Rankin Erickson, Joan ^a   Manasse, Nancy ^a   Lauritzen, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR NONVOCAL PERSONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

DYSARTHRIC SPEECH; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI);

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 0034271946     PISSN: 07434618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07434610012331279044     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Alwang, G. (1998). Dragon NaturallySpeaking 3.0 Preferred Edition. PC Magazine, 77(18), 199-200.
2. Bernstein, J., & Franco, H. (1996). Speech recognition by computer. In N. J. Lass (Ed.), Principles of experimental phonetics (pp. 408-434). St. Louis: Mosby.
3. Coleman, C., & Meyers, L. (1991). Computer recognition of the speech of adults with cerebral palsy and dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 34-42.
4. De La Paz, S. (1999). Composing via dictation and speech recognition systems: Compensatory technology for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 173-182.
5. Ferrier, L. J., Jarrell, N., Carpenter, T., & Shane, H. C. (1992). A case study of a dysarthric speaker using the DragonDictate Voice Recognition System. Journal for Computer Users in Speech and Hearing, 8, 33-52.
6. French, N. R., & Steinberg, J. C. (1947). Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 19, 90-119.
7. Fried-Oken, M. (1985). Voice recognition device as a computer interface for motor and speech impaired people. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66, 678-681.
8. Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (1995). Compensatory effectiveness of speech recognition on the written composition performance of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 159-174.
9. Kurzweil VoicePad Platinum [commercial software]. (1996). Waltham, MA: Kurzweil Applied Intelligence.
10. Manasse, N. J., Hux, K., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L (2000). Speech recognition training for enhancing written language generation by a traumatic brain injury survivor. Brain Injury.
11. Pollack, I. (1948). Effects of high-pass and low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 259-266.
12. Wetzel, K. (1996) Speech-recognizing computers: A written-communication tool for students with learning disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 371-380.
13. Yorkston, K., & Beukelman, D. R., (1981). Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech. Tigard, OR: C. C. Publications.
14. Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., & Tice, R. (1996). Sentence Intelligibility Test. Lincoln, NE: Tice Technology Services.
15. Youdin, M., Sell, G. H., Reich, T., Clagnaz, M., Louie, H., & Kolwicz, R. (1980). A voice controlled powered wheelchair and environmental control system for the severely disabled. Medical Progress through Technology, 7, 139-143.