Growth with surface curvature on quenched potentials

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 62, Issue 3 A, 2000, Pages 3299-3302

  Lee, Jae Hwan ^a   Kim, Soo Kyung ^a   Kim, Jin Min ^a  

^a Soongsil University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; GROWTH (MATERIALS); INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROUGHNESS MEASUREMENT;

MULLINS-HERRING EQUATIONS; QUENCHED POTENTIALS; SINE WAVES; SURFACE CURVATURE;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 0034271872     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.3299     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. A.-L. Barabási and H.E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995); Dynamics of Fractal Surfaces, edited by F. Family and T. Vicsek (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991); J. Krug and H. Spohn, in Solids Far From Equilibrium: Growth, Morphology and Defects, edited by C. Godreche (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991).
2. A.-L. Barabási and H.E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995); Dynamics of Fractal Surfaces, edited by F. Family and T. Vicsek (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991); J. Krug and H. Spohn, in Solids Far From Equilibrium: Growth, Morphology and Defects, edited by C. Godreche (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991).
3. A.-L. Barabási and H.E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995); Dynamics of Fractal Surfaces, edited by F. Family and T. Vicsek (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991); J. Krug and H. Spohn, in Solids Far From Equilibrium: Growth, Morphology and Defects, edited by C. Godreche (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991).
4. D. Kessler, H. Levine, and Y. Tu, Phys. Rev. A 43, 4551 (1991).
5. R. Bruinsma and G. Aeppli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1547 (1984).
6. B. Kahng, K. Park, and J. Park, Phys. Rev. E 57, 3814 (1998).
7. S.V. Buldyrev, A.-L. Barabási, F. Caserta, S. Havlin, H.E. Stanley, and T. Vicsek, Phys. Rev. A 45, R8313 (1992).
8. F. Family and T. Vicsek, J. Phys. A 18, L75 (1985); F. Family, Physica A 168, 561 (1990).
9. F. Family and T. Vicsek, J. Phys. A 18, L75 (1985); F. Family, Physica A 168, 561 (1990).
10. M. Paczuski, Phys. Rev. E 52, R2137 (1995).
11. S.F. Edwards and D.R. Wilkinson, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 381, 17 (1982).
12. H. Leschhorn, Physica A 195, 324 (1993).
13. M. Paczuski, S. Maslov, and P. Bak, Phys. Rev. E 53, 414 (1996).
14. L.A.N. Amaral, A.-L. Barabási, H.A. Makse, and H.E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 52, 4087 ( 1995).
15. S. Galluccio and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. E 51, 1686 (1995).
16. J.M. López and M.A. Rodríguez, J. Phys. I 7, 1191 (1997).
17. K. Park and I.-m. Kim, Phys. Rev. E 59, 5150 (1999).
18. S. Roux and A. Hansen, J. Phys. I 4, 515 (1994).
19. D.E. Wolf and J. Villain, Europhys. Lett. 13, 389 (1990).
20. W.W. Mullins, J. Appl. Phys. 28, 333 (1959).
21. Y. Lee, I.-m. Kim, and J.M. Kim, in Dynamics of Fluctuating Interfaces and Related Phenomena, edited by D. Kim, H. Park, and B. Kahng (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), p. 151.
22. M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986).
23. J.M. Kim and J.M. Kosterlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2289 (1989).
24. After this work had been done, we noticed that K. Park and I. Kim studied a discrete model for the QMH equation and obtained α≈1.9, which is smaller than the value of our result.