MR findings in diffuse renal parenchymal disease

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 136-144

  Kettritz, Ute ^a   Semelka, Richard C ^a   Brown, Elizabeth D ^a   Sharp, Tonya J ^b   Lawing, William L ^a   Colindres, Romulo E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b IL   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast enhancement; Diseases; Kidney; Kidney, function; Kidney. MR; Magnetic resonance (MR)

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY DISEASE; KIDNEY MEDULLA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY DISEASES; KIDNEY MEDULLA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0029682863     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880060125     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Levey AS, Madaio MP, Perrone RD. Laboratory assessment of renal disease: clearance, urinalysis, and renal biopsy. In: Brenner BM, Rector FC, eds. The kidney, 4th ed., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1991; 919-968.
2. Choyke PL, Frank JA, Girton ME, et al. Dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of the kidney: experimental results. Radiology 1989; 170:713-720.
3. Frank JA, Choyke PL, Austin HA, Girton ME. Functional MR of the kidney. Magn Reson Med 1991; 22:319-323.
4. Krestin GP, Schumann-Giampieri G, Haustein J, et al. Functional dynamic MRI, pharmacokinetics and safety of Gd-DTPA in patients with impaired renal function. Eur Radiol 1992; 2:16-23.
5. Mitchell DG, Roza AM, Spritzer CE. et al. Acute renal allograft rejection: difficulty in diagnosis of histologically mild cases by MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11:655-663.
6. Marotti M, Hricak H, Terrier F, McAninch JW, Thuroff JW. MR in renal disease: importance of corticomedullary distinction. Magn Reson Med 1987; 5:160-172.
7. Liou JTS, Lee JTK, Heiken JP, Totty WG, Molina PL. Flye WM. Renal transplants: Can acute rejection and acute tubular necrosis be differentiated with MR imaging? Radiology 1991; 179:61-65.
8. Semelka RC, Corrigan K, Ascher SM, Brown JJ, Colindres RE. Renal corticomedullary differentiation: observation in patients with differing serum creatinine levels. Radiology 1994; 190:149-152.
9. von Schulthess GK, ed. Morphology and function in MRI: cardiovascular and renal systems, 1st ed. Berlin: Springer, 1989; 111-132.
10. Ishikawa I, Masuzaki S, Saito T, Yuri T, Shinoda A, Tsujigiwa M. Magnetic resonance imaging in renal infarction and ischemia. Nephron 1989; 51:99-102.
11. Mangili R, Sironi S, Rankel G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1992; 35:1002-1008.
12. Semelka RC. Hricak H, Tomei E, Floth A, Stoller M. Obstructive nephropathy: evaluation with dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 175:797-803.
13. Krestin GP, Fischbach R, Vorreuther R. von Schulthess GK. Alterations in renal morphology and function after ESWL therapy: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 1993; 3:227-233.
14. Neuerburg J, Daus HJ, Recker F, et al. Effects of lithotripsy on rat kidney: evaluation with MR imaging, histology, and electron microscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989; 13:82-89.
15. Hanna S, Helenon O, Legendre C, et al. MR Imaging of renal transplant rejection. Acta Radiol 1991; 32:42-46.
16. Jennerholm S, Backman U, Bohman S-O, Hemmingsson A, Nyman R. Magnetic resonance imaging of the transplanted kidney. Acta Radiol 1990; 5:499-503.
17. Rholl KS, Lee JKT, Ling D, Sicard GA, Griffith RC, Freeman M. Acute renal rejection versus acute tubular necrosis in a canine model: MR evaluation. Radiology 1986; 160:113-117.
18. Terrier F, Hricak H, Justich E, Dooms GC, Grodd W. The diagnostic value of renal cortex-to-medulla contrast on magnetic resonance images. Eur J Radiol 1986; 6:121-126.
19. Hricak H, Terrier F, Marotti M, et al. Posttransplant renal rejection: comparison of quantitative scintigraphy, US, and MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 162:685-688.
20. Abrashkin S, Weininger J, Griffel L, Schneider R, Iaina A. Proton magnetic resonance in experimental acute and chronic renal failure in rats. Renal Failure 1987; 10:21-27.
21. Iaina A, Abrashkin S, Weininger J. Proton MR study of different types of experimental acute renal failure in rats. Magn Reson Imaging 1986; 4:241-244.
22. Dunnill MS, Halley W. Some observations on the quantitative anatomy of the kidney. J Pathol 1973; 110:113-121.
23. Glassock RJ, Adler SG, Ward HJ, Cohen AH. Primary glomerular diseases. In: Brenner BM, Rector FC, eds. The kidney. 4th ed., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders. 1991; 1182-1279.
24. Roubidoux MA. MR imaging of hemorrhage and iron deposition in the kidney. Radiographies 1994; 14:1033-1044.
25. Siegelman ES, Outwater E, Hanau CA, et al. Abdominal iron distribution in sickle cell disease: MR findings in transfusion and nontransfusion dependent patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18:63-67.
26. Solez K. Acute renal failure. In: Heptinstall RH, ed. Pathology of the kidney, 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1983; 1235-1314.
27. Brezis M, Rosen S, Epstein FH. Acute renal failure. In: Brenner BM, Rector FC, eds. The kidney, 4th ed., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1991; 993-1061.
28. Coley BD, Mattrey RF, Mitten RM, Peterson T. The physiologic basis of the radiodense renal medulla after the administration of blood pool contrast agent PFOB. Invest Radiol 1990; 25: 1287-1293.
29. Bookstein JJ, Abrams HL, Buenger RE, et al. Radiologic aspects of renovascular hypertension. Part 2. The role of urography in unilateral renovascular disease. JAMA 1972; 220:1225-1230.
30. Probst P, Link L, Futterlieb A, Wehrli HP. Experimental acute renal artery stenosis. Dynamic CT and renal perfusion. Invest Radiol 1984; 19:87-95.
31. Badiola-Varela CM. Acute renal cortical necrosis: contrast-enhanced CT and pathologic correlation. Urol Radiol 1992; 14: 159-160.
32. Gourtsoyiannis N, Prassopoulos P, Cavouras D, Pantelidis N. The thickness of the renal parenchyma decreases with age: a CT study of 360 patients. AJR 1990; 155:541-544.
33. Davidson AJ, Hartman DS, eds. Radiology of the kidney and urinary tract, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1994.
34. Ishikawa I, Saito Y, Onouchi Z, et al. Delayed contrast enhancement in acute focal bacterial nephritis: CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985; 9:894-897.
35. Mena E, Bookstein J, Gikas PW. Angiographic diagnosis of renal parenchymal disease. Radiology 1973; 108:523-532.
36. Rauschkolb EN, Sandler CM, Patel S, Childs TJ. Computed tomography of renal inflammatory disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982; 6:502-506.
37. von Schulthess GK, Kuoni W, Wüthrich R. Duewell S, Krestin G. Semiautomated ROI analysis in dynamic MR studies. Part II: Application to renal function examination. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:733-741.
38. Wolf GL, Hoop B, Cannillo JA, Rogowska JA, Halpern EF. Measurement of renal transit of gadopentetate dimeglumine with echo-planar MR imaging. JMRI 1994; 4:365-372.
39. Frank JA, Choyke PL, Girton ME, et al. Gadolinium-DTPA enhanced dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of cisplatinum nephrotoxicity. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989; 13:448-459.
40. Kikinis R, von Schulthess GK, Jäger P, et al. Normal and hydronephrotic kidney: evaluation of renal function with contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 165:837-842.
41. Carvlin MJ, Arger PH, Kundel HL, et al. Acute tubular necrosis: use of gadolinium-DTPA and fast MR imaging to evaluate renal function in the rabbit. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11: 488-495.
42. Brezis M, Rosen S. Hypoxia of the renal medulla-its implications for disease. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:647-655.