Electrostatics of mesophilic and psychrophilic trypsin isoenzymes: Qualitative evaluation of electrostatic differences at the substrate binding site

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 207-217

  Gorfe, Alemayehu A ^a   Brandsdal, Bjørn O ^a   Leiros, Hanna Kirsti S ^a   Helland, Ronny ^a   Smalås, Arne O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

Cold adapted trypsins; Poisson Boltzmann; Potential; Specificity pocket; Substrate binding

Indexed keywords

ISOENZYME; TRYPSIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; ELECTRIC FIELD; ENZYME BINDING; ENZYME STRUCTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034257240     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000801)40:2<207::AID-PROT40>3.0.CO;2-U     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Gerday C, Aittaleb M, Arpigny JL, et al. Psychrophilic enzymes: a thermodynamic challenge. Biochem Biophys Acta 1997;1342:119-131.
2. Feller G, Narinx E, Arpigny JL, et al. Enzymes from psychrophilic organisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1996;18:189-202.
3. Kristjansson MM, Ásgeirsson B, Bjarnason JB. Serine proteinases from cold-adapted organisms. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997;415:27-46.
4. Outzen H, Berglund GI, Smalås AO, Willassen NP. Temperature and pH sensitivity of trypsins from atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in comparison with bovine and porcine trypsin. Comp Biochem Biophys 1996;115B:33-45.
5. Asgeirsson B, Fox JW, Bjarnason JB. Purification and characterization of trypsin from the poikilotherm Gadus morhua. Eur J Biochem 1989;180:85-94.
6. Genicot S, Feller G, Gerday C. Trypsin from the antarctic fish (Paranotothenia magellanica forster) as compared with trout (Salmo gairdneri) trypsin. Comp Biochem Physiol 1988;90B:601-609.
7. Schechter I, Berger A. On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1967;27:157-162.
8. Krowarsch D, Dadlez M, Buczek O, Krokoszynska I, Smalås AO, Otlewski J. Interscaffolding additivity: binding of P1 variants of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor to four serine proteinases. J Mol Biol 1999;289:175-186.
9. Holland R, Leiros I, Willassen NP, Berglund GI, Smalås AO. The crystal structure of anionic salmon trypsin in complex with bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Eur J Biochem 1998;256:317-324.
10. Rypniewski WR, Perrakis A, Vorgias CE, Wilson KS. Evolutionary divergence and conservation of trypsin. Protein Eng 1994;7:57-64.
11. Leiros H-KS, Willassen NP, Smalås AO. Residue determinants and sequence analysis of cold-adapted trypsins. Extremophilies 1999;3:205-219.
12. Leiros H-KS, Willassen NP, Smalås AO. Structural comparison of psychrophilic and mesophilic trypsins: elucidating the molecular basis of cold-adaptation. Eur J Biochem 2000;267:1039-1049.
13. Smalås AO, Heimstad ES, Hordvik A, Willassen NP, Male R. Cold adaption of enzymes: structural comparison between salmon and bovine trypsins. Proteins 1994;20:149-166.
14. Sharp KA, Nichols A. Delphi Version 3.0.® 1988 Colombia University.
15. Sharp KA, Honig B. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1990; 19:301-332.
16. Richards FM. Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 1977;6:151-176.
17. Gilson MK, Rashin A, Fine R, Honig B. On the calculation of electrostatic interactions in proteins. J Mol Biol 1985;184:503-516.
18. Gilson MK, Honig B. Calculation of the total electrostatic energy of a macromolecular system: solvation energy, binding energies, and conformational analysis. Proteins 1988;4:7-18.
19. Connolly ML. The molecular surface package. J Mol Graphics 1993;11:139-141.
20. Weiner SJ, Kollman PA, Case DA, et al. A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J Am Chem Soc 1984;106:765-783.
21. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, et al. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
22. Brooks CL, Karplus M. Deformable stochastic boundaries in molecular dynamics. J Chem Phys 1983;79:6312-6325.
23. Oldfield TJ. SQUID: a program for the analysis and display of data from crystallography and molecular dynamics. J Mol Graphics 1992;10:247-252.
24. Nicholls A, Sharp K, Honig B. Protein folding and association: insight from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1991;11:281-296.
25. Jones TA, Zou J-Y, Cowan SW, Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr 1991;A47:110-119.
26. Schrøder H-K, Willassen NP, Smalås AO. Structure of a non-psychrophilic trypsin from a cold-adapted fish species. Acta Crystallogr 1998;D54:780-798.
27. Earnest T, Fauman E, Craik CS, Stroud R. 1.59 Å structure of trypsin at 120 K: comparison of low temperature and room temperature structures. Proteins 1991;10:171-181.
28. Huang Q, Liu S, Tang Y. Refined 1.6 Å resolution crystal structure of the complex formed between porcine β-trypsin and MCTI-A, a trypsin inhibitor of the squash family: detailed comparison with bovine β-trypsin and its complex. J Mol Biol 1993;229:1022-1036.
29. Marquart M, Walter J, Deisenhofer J, Bode W, Huber R. The geometry of the reactive site and of the peptide groups in trypsin, trypsinogen and its complexes with inhibitors. Acta Crystallogr 1983;B39:480-490.
30. Klapper I, Hagstrom R, Fine R, Sharp K, Honig B. Focusing of electric fields in the active site of Cu-Zn superoxid dismutase: effects of ionic strenght and amino-acid modification. Proteins 1986;1:47-59.
31. Sharp K, Fine R, Honig B. Computer simulations of diffusion of a substrate to an active site of an enzyme. Science 1987;236:1460-1463.
32. Warwicker J, Ollis D, Richard FM, Steitz TA. Electrostatic field of the large fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. J Mol Biol 1985;186:645-649.
33. Gilson MK, Honig B. Calculation of electrostatic potentials in an enzyme active site. Nature 1987;330:84-86.
34. Sitkoff D, Lockhart DJ, Sharp KA, Honig B. Calculation of electrostatic effects at the amino terminus of an alpha helix. Biophys J 1994;67:2251-2260.
35. Soman K, Yang AS, Honig B, Fletterick R. Electrostatic potentials in trypsin isoenzymes. Biochemistry 1989;28:9918-9926.
36. Warshel A, Naray-Szabo G, Sussman F, Hwang JK. How do serine proteases really work? Biochemistry 1989;28:3629-3637.
37. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 1971;55:379-400.
38. Hedstrom L. Trypsin: a case study in the structural determinants of enzyme specificity. Biol Chem 1996;377:465-470.
39. Hedstrom L, Farr-Jones S, Kettner CA, Rutter WJ. Converting trypsin to chymotrypsin: ground state binding does not determine substrate specificity. Biochemistry 1994;33:8764-8769.
40. Hedstrom L, Szilagyi L, Rutter WJ. Converting trypsin to chymotrypsin: the role of surface loops. Science 1992;255:1249-1253.
41. Hung SH, Hedstrom L. Converting trypsin to elastase: substitution of the S1 site and adjacent loops reconstitutes esterase specificity but not amidase activity. Protein Eng 1998;11:669-673.
42. Chobert JM, Briand L, Tran V, Haertle T. How the substitution of K188 of trypsin binding site by aromatic amino acids can influence the processing of beta-casein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998;246:847-858.