When authentic experiences are "enminded" into disciplinary genres: Crossing biographic and situated knowledge

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 331-359

  Tochon, François Victor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Authenticity; Disciplinary didactics; Genre; Groups; Indexation; Oral exchange; Premises; Semiotics; Situation models

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034239553     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00003-7     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Altet, M. (1994). La Formation Professionnelle Des Enseignants. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
2. Audigier, F. (1999). School disciplines, social representations, and the construction of the didactics of history, geography and civics. Instructional Science, 27 (1-2), 97-117.
3. Beillerot, J., Blanchard-Laville, C., & Mosconi, N. (1996). Pour Une Clinique Du Rapport Au Savoir. Paris: L'Harmattan.
4. Bereiter, C. (1990). Aspects of an educational learning theory. Review of Educational Research, 60 (4), 603-624.
5. Bertrand, Y., & Houssaye, J. (1999). Pedagogy and didactics: An incestuous relationship. Instructional Science, 27 (1-2), 33-51.
6. Colomb, J. (1998). The question of the reference for school knowledge: A comparative semiotics approach. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Diego, CA, April 1998.
7. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Selega-Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1990). Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic Assessment in Action: Studies of Schools and Students at Work. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. De Corte, E. (1995). Fostering cognitive growth: A perspective from research on mathematics learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 30 (1), 37-46.
10. De Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M. (1991). Knowledge of problem situations in physics: A comparison of good and poor novice problem solvers. Learning and Instruction, 1 (4), 289-302.
11. Einbender, L., & Wood, D. (1995). An Authentic Journey: Teachers' Emergent Understanding about Authentic Assessment and Practice. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press.
12. Entlewistle, N. (1995). Influences of instructional settings on learning and cognitive development - Findings from european research programs. Educational Psychologist, 30 (1), 1-3.
13. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The place of practical argument in the education of teachers. In V. Richardson, Teacher Change and the Staff Development Process: A Case in Reading Instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward A General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Fayol, M. (1992). Comprendre ce qu'on lit: De l'automatisme au contrôle. In M. Fayol, J.-E. Gombert, P. Lecocq, L. Sprenger-Charolles, & D. Zagar, Psychologie Cognitive De La Lecture (pp. 73-105). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
16. Gauthier, C. (1997). Pour Une Théorie De La Pédagogie: Recherches Contemporaines Sur Le Savoir Enseignant. Brussels: De Boeck Université.
17. Gundem, B.B. (1992). The place of didactics in curriculum in Scandinavia. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, CA, April 1992.
18. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1990). Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Hopmann, S. (1992). Starting a dialogue: Roots and issues of the beginning conversation between European didaktik and the American curriculum tradition. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, CA, April 1992.
20. Johnson-Laird, D. (1994). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-interaction model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
22. Lacotte, J., & Lenoir, Y. (1999). Didactics and professional practice in preservice teacher education: A comparison of the situations in France and Quebec. Instructional Science, 27 (1-2), 165-192.
23. Lesh, R., & Lamon, S. (1992). Assessment of Authentic Performance in School Mathematics. Washington, DC: AAAS.
24. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and the consequences in the validation of performance assessment. Educational Researcher, 23 (2), 13-23.
25. Piaget, J. (1974). La Prise De Conscience. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
26. Pinard, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding Curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
27. Raisky, C., & Caillot, M. (1996). Au-delà Des Didactiques, Le Didactique. Brussels: De Boeck Université.
28. Richard, J.-F. (1990). Les Activités Mentales: Comprendre, Raisonner, Trouver Des Solutions. Paris: Armand Colin, U Psychologie.
29. Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350.
30. Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7 (3), 243-267.
31. De Saussure, F. (1966). Course in general linguistics (C. Bally and A. Sechehaye; trans. of Cours De Linguistique Générale [1915] by W. Baskin.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. De Saussure, F. (1968 [1915]). Cours De Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.
33. Schneuwly, B., & Dolz, J. (1997). Les genres scolaires. Des pratiques langagières aux objets d'enseignement. Repères, 15, 27-40.
34. Schön, D. A. (1996). La recherche d'une nouvelle épistémologie de la pratique et de ce qu'elle implique pour l'éducation des adultes. In J.-M. Barbier, Savoirs Théoriques Et Savoirs D'action (pp. 201-222). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
35. Shulman, L. S. (1990). The transformation of knowledge: A model of pedagogical reasoning and action. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Boston, MA, April 1990.
36. Terwilliger, J. (1997). Semantics, psychometrics, and assessment reform: A close look at "authentic" assessment. Educational Researcher, 26 (8), 24-27.
37. Tochon, F. V. (1993a). L'enseignant Expert (The Expert Teacher). Paris: Nathan.
38. Tochon, F. V. (1993b). From teachers' thinking to macrosemantics: Catching instructional organisers and connectors in language arts. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 12 (1), 1-22.
39. Tochon, F. V. (1993c). The embedding of discourse types in teaching interactions amongst novice and expert teachers. Paper presented at the World Convention of the International Association of Applied Linguistics, Amsterdam, Netherlands, August 1993.
40. Tochon, F. V. (1994). Expert/novice Interactional Junction Points in Teaching/learning Situations: Attempts at Describing Professional Consciousness. Presentation made at Princeton University, Forbes College, Academy of Consciousness Studies, organised by the Fetzer Institute and the Faculty of Engineering. Princeton University, NJ.
41. Tochon, F. V. (1996a). Grammaires de l'expérience et savoirs-objets: Le savoir focal dans la construction de nouveaux modèles de formation. In J.-M. Barbier, Savoirs Théoriques Et Savoirs D'action (pp. 249-273). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
42. Tochon, F. V. (1996b). Diversités didactiques, cohérence pédagogique (Didactic diversity, pedagogical coherence). In A. Bentolila, L'école, Diversités et Cohérence (School, Diversity and Coherence). Les Entretiens Nathan (pp. 161-176). Paris: Nathan.
43. Tochon, F. V. (1997). La Résolution Deproblème En Groupe Dans Une Production Verbale Complexe Régulée Par Un Pair, Une Stagiaire Ou Une Enseignante Experte (Group Problem Solving in A Complex Verbal Production with Expert-, Practicum Teacher-, and Peer-regulation). Post-doctoral dissertation. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa.
44. Tochon, F. V. (1998). Bakhtinian plagiarism in group interactions: From negative interdependance to a semiotic model of constructive learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Diego, CA, April 1998. ERIC Document ED 418959.
45. Tochon, F. V. (1999). Semiotic foundations for building the new didactics: An introduction to the prototype features of the discipline. Instructional Science, 27 (1-2), 9-32.
46. Tochon, F. V. (2000a). La régulation de groupe de l'enseignant expert face à celle du stagiaire (Practicum- vs expert-teacher's group regulation). In Cahiers Du Centre De Recherches En Éducation De L'université De Nantes. Nantes, France: Centre Régional de Documentation Pédagogique des Pays de la Loire.
47. Tochon, F. V. (2000b). A semiotic theory of supervision as friendship: Cooperative communication as support in second-language education. In Proceedings of the Semiotic Society of America (pp. 171-186). New York: Peter Lang.
48. Tochon, F. V., & Munby, H. (1994). Novice and expert teachers' time epistemology: A wave function from didactics to pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9 (2), 205-218.
49. Vosdaniou, S., & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50. Westbury, I., Doyle, W., & Künzli, R. (1993). The German Didactic Tradition: Implications for Pedagogical Research. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
51. Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 20, 703-713.
52. Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessing Student Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53. Wraga, W. G. (1999). Extracting sun-beams out of cucumbers: The retreat from practice in reconceptualised curriculum studies. Educational Researcher, 28 (1), 4-13.