Making Accounting Knowledge: Peering at Power

Critical Perspectives on Accounting

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 409-431

  Fogarty, Timothy ^a   Ravenscroft, Sue ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034239457     PISSN: 10452354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cpac.1999.0380     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Alsup R., Holland M., Jacobs F. The Perceived Availability of Resources which Contribute to Accounting Faculty Productivity. Journal of Accounting Education. 6:1988;261-278.
2. Archer, S, Policy Chains, Power-knowledge Relations and Moral Hazard in Accounting Research. 1996.
3. Armstrong J. S. Publication of Research on Controversial Topics: The Early Acceptance Procedure. International Journal of Forecasting. 12:1996;299-302.
4. Aronowitz S., Giroux H. Postmodern Education. 1991;University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
5. Arrington C. E., Schweiker W. The Rhetoric and Rationality of Accounting Research. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 17:1992;511-534.
6. Bamber, L, Christensen, T. Gaver, K, The Effect of Research Design Cho ices: Have we been Misinterpreting Evidence from Early Information Content Research?, 1998.
7. Banner J. M. Jr. Preserving the Integrity of Peer Review. Scholarly Publishing. 1998;109-115.
8. Baumeister R. Dear Journal Editor, It's Me Again. Dialogue. 1990.
9. Becker T. Academic Tribes and Territories. 1989;Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK.
10. Belshaw C. Peer Review and the Current Anthropology Experience. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 5:1982;200-201.
11. Berkenkotter C. The Power and the Perils of Peer Review. Rhetoric Review. 13:1995;245-248.
12. Bricker R. J. An Empirical Investigation of the Structure of Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting Research. 27:1989;246-262.
13. Bricker R., Previts G. The Sociology of Accountancy: A Study of Academic and Practice Community Schisms. Accounting Horizons. 4:1990;1-14.
14. Brint S., Karabel J. The Diverted Dream: Community Colleges and the Promise of Educational Opportunity in America 19002p-9p1985. 1989;Oxford Books, New York, NY.
15. Brown L. Influential Accounting Articles, Individuals, Ph.D. Granting In stitutions and Faculties: A Citational Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 21:1996;723-754.
16. Burke D. A New Academic Marketplace. 1988;Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
17. Caplow T., McGee R. The Academic Marketplace. 1958;Basic Books, New York, NY.
18. Cargile B., Bublitz B. Factors Contributing to Published Research by Accounting Faculties. Accounting Review. 61:1986;158-178.
19. Chung K. H., Pak H. S., Cox R. A. K. Patterns of Research Output in the Accounting Literature: A Study of the Bibliometric Distributions. Abacus. 28:1992;168-185.
20. Colignon R., Covaleski M. A Weberian Framework in the Study of Accou nting. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 16:1991;141-157.
21. Collins H. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. 1985;Sage, London UK.
22. Cushing, B. A Kuhnian Interpretation of the Historical Evolution of Accounting, Accounting Historians Journal, 6, 1-41.
23. Cushing, B. Paradigms, Frameworks and Scientific Research in Management Information Systems, Journal of Information Systems, 4, 39-59.
24. Dalton M. Refereeing of Scholarly Works for Primary Publishing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 30:1995;213-250.
25. Dandeker C. Surveillance, Power and Modernity. 1990;Polity Press, Cambridge UK.
26. Day P. Accountabilities: Five Public Services. 1987;Tavistock, London UK.
27. Dyckman T. R., Zeff S. A. Two Decades of the 9pJournal of Accounting R esearch2p. Journal of Accounting Research. 22:1984;225-297.
28. Englebrecht T., Iyer G., Patterson D. An Empirical Investigation of the Publication Productivity of Promoted Accounting Faculty. Issues in Accounting Education. 8:1994;45-68.
29. Fogarty T. J., Ravenscroft S. P. Ethical Problems Posed by the Repeated Reviewer in Academic Peer Review. Journal of Information Ethics. 8:1998;45-66.
30. Fogarty T. J., Ruhl J., Institutional Antecedents of Accounting Faculty Research Productivity: A LISREL Study of the. Best and the Brightest. Issues in Accounting Education. 12:1997;27-48.
31. Fontaine S. I. With Writers' Eyes: Perception and Change in Manuscript Review Procedures. Rhetoric Review. 13:1995;259-262.
32. Foucault M. The History of Sexuality: Volume 1. 1978;Pantheon Books, New York NY.
33. Foucault M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 1979;Penguin, Harmonsworth UK.
34. Foucault M. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 19722p-9p1977. 1980;Pantheon Books, New York NY.
35. Fox M. F. Disciplinary Fragmentation, Peer Review, and the Publication P rocess. The American Sociologist. 1989;188-191.
36. Fox M. F. Scientific Misconduct and Editorial and Peer Review Processes. Journal of Higher Education. 65:1994;298-309.
37. Gans J., Shepherd G. B. How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 8:1994;165-179.
38. Giddens A. Central Problems in Social Theory. 1979;University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
39. Giddens A. Four Theses on Ideology. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory. 7:1983;119-125.
40. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society. 1984;University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
41. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity. 1990;Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
42. Goffman E. On Cooling the Mark Out: Some Aspects of Adaptation to Failure. Psychiatry. 15:1952;451-463.
43. Hall T., Ross W. Contextual Effects in Measuring Accounting Faculty Perceptions of Accounting Journals: An Empirical Test and Updated Rankings. Advances in Accounting. 9:1991;161-182.
44. Hargens L., Hagstrom W. Scientific Consensus and Academic Status and Attainment Patterns. Sociology of Education. 45:1982;183-196.
45. Harnad S. Peer Commentary on Peer Review. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 5:1982;185-186.
46. Haskell, T. Justifying the Rights of Academic Freedom in the Era of 'Power/Knowledge' L. Menard, The Future of Academic Freedom, 43-90, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
47. Hoskin, K. Macve, R. Writing, Examining, Disciplining: The Genesis of Accountings Modern Power, A. HopwoodP. Miller, Accounting as a Social and Institutional Practice, 67-97, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
48. Howard T., Nikolai L. Attitude Measurement and Perceptions of Accoun ting Faculty Publication Outlets. Accounting Review. 58:1983;765-776.
49. Hull R., Wright G. Faculty Perceptions of Journal Quality: An Update. Accounting Horizons. 4:1990;77-98.
50. Jacobs F., Hartgraves A., Beard L. Publication Productivity of Doctoral Alumni: A Time-adjusted Model. Accounting Review. 61:1986;179-187.
51. Kuhn T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1970;University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.
52. Laband D., Piette M. Favoritism Versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors. Journal of Political Economy. 102:1994;194-203.
53. Langenderfer H. Accounting Education's History: A 100-year Search For Identity. Journal of Accountancy. 1987.
54. Lee T. Shaping the US Academic Accounting Research Profession: The American Accounting Association and the Social Construction of a Professional Elite. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 6:1995;241-261.
55. Lee, T. The Editorial Gatekeepers of the Accounting Academy, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10, 11-30.
56. Lee, T. Anatomy of a Professional Elite: The Executive Committee of the American Accounting Association 1916-1996, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8, 357-380.
57. Lukka K., Kasanen E. Is Accounting a Global or a Local Discipline? Evidence from Major Research Journals. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 21:1996;715-733.
58. McLeod, P. Elston, S, Anonymity and Consensus in Computed-supported Group Decision-making. 1998.
59. McNutt R. A., Evans A. T., Fletcher R. H., Fletcher S. W. The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review. Journal of the American Medical Association. 263:1990;1371-1376.
60. Miller A. C., Serzan S. L. Criteria for Identifying a Refereed Journal. Journal of Higher Education. 55:1984;673-699.
61. Mittermaier L. J. Representation on the Editorial Boards of Academic Accounting Journals: An Analysis of Accounting Faculties and Doctoral Programs. Issues in Accounting Education. 6:1991;221-238.
62. Panozzo F. The Making of a Good Academic Accountant. Accounting Organizations and Society. 22:1997;447-480.
63. Peters D. P., Ceci S. J. Peer-review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Published Articles, Submitted Again. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 5:1982;187-195.
64. Previts G., Merino B. A History of Accountancy in the United States. 1998;Ohio State University Press, Columbus OH.
65. Pynchon T. Gravity's Rainbow. 1973;Viking Press, New York NY.
66. Read W., Rama D., Raghunandan K. Are Publication Requirements for Accounting Faculty Promotions Still Increasing? Issues in Accounting Education. 13:1998;327-340.
67. Reiter, S. Williams, P. F, Scientific Conversation in Accounting Research. 1998.
68. Scarr S. Anosmic Peer Review: A Rose by Another Name is Evidently not a R ose. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 5:1982;237-238.
69. Sheldahl T. The American Accounting Association in its Third Quarter Century 19662p-9p1991: Central Governance and Administration. 1992;Garland Press, New York NY.
70. Silverman R. G. Peer Judgment: An Ideal Typification. Creation, Diffusion, Utilization. 9:1988;362-382.
71. Sinclair A. The Chameleon of Accountability: Forms and Discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 20:1995;219-237.
72. Smith K., Laband D. The Role of Editors' Professional Connections in Determining which Papers get Published: Evidence from Accounting Research Journals. Accounting Perspectives. 1:1995;21-30.
73. Starr P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. 1982;Basic Books, New York.
74. Stevens K., Stevens W. Ranking Accounting Doctoral Programs by the Research Productivity of Graduates. Accounting Educators' Journal. 8:1996.
75. Urbancic F. R. Measuring the Eminence of Business Schools: A Longitudinal Analysis. Akron Business and Economic Review. 20:1989;29-39.
76. Wells M. A Revolution in Accounting Thought? Accounting Review. 51:1976;471-482.
77. Williams P. F. A Descriptive Analysis of Authorship in The Accounting Review. Accounting Review. 60:1985;300-313.
78. Williams P. F., Rodgers J. L. The Accounting Review and the Production of Accounting Knowledge. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 6:1995;263-287.
79. Wolin, S. On Theory and Practice of Power, J. Arac, After Foucault, 179-201, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers' University Press, 1991.
80. Yancik, A, Cooling Out Processes in Involuntary Endings. 1995.
81. Zeff S. A. A Study of Academic Research Journals in Accounting. Accounting Horizons. 10:1996;158-177.
82. Zivney T. L., Bertin W. J., Gavin T. A. A Comprehensive Examination of Accounting Faculty Publishing. Issues in Accounting Education. 10:1995;1-26.