A compendium of information processing functions in nursing development and pilot study

Computers in Nursing

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 189-196

  Ammenwerth, Elske ^a   Haux, Reinhold ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Information processing functions in nursing; Management of information systems; Nursing informatics; Nursing information systems; Pilot study; Quality of information processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GERMANY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; MENTAL FUNCTION; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PILOT STUDY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; WORK;

GERMANY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; JOB DESCRIPTION; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MENTAL PROCESSES; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PILOT PROJECTS; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0034223466     PISSN: 07368593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Yancey R, Given B, White N, DeVoss D, Coyle B. Computerized documentation for a rural nursing intervention project. Comput Nurs. 1998;16(5): 275-284.
2. Hacker W, Scheuch K, Kunath H, Haux R. Computer in der Krankenpflege. Regensburg, Germany: Roderer-Verlag; 1999.
3. Winter A, Haux R. A three-level graph-based model for the management of hospital information systems. Methods Inf Med. 1995;34:378-96.
4. Goossen W, Epping P, Dassen T. Criteria for nursing information systems as a component of the electronic patient record: An international delphi study. Comput Nurs. 1997;15(6):307-315.
5. Winter A, Brigl B, Buchauer A, et al. Purpose and structure of strategic plans for information management in hospitals. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics (MIE 2000). August 2000, Hanover, Germany.
6. Butler MA, Bender AD. Intensive care unit bedside documentation systems-realizing cost savings and quality improvements. Comput Nurs. 1999;17(1): 32-38.
7. Bowles K. The barriers and benefits of nursing information systems. Comput Nurs. 1997;15(4):191-196.
8. Axford RL, Carter BE. Impact of clinical information systems on nursing practice-nurses' perspectives. Comput Nurs. 1996;14(3):156-163.
9. Sicotte, C, Denis, J, Lehoux, P. The computer based patient record: A strategic issue in process innovation. J Med Syst. 1998;22(6):431-443.
10. Bussing A, Herbig B. Recent developments of care information systems in Germany. Comput Nurs. 1998;16(6):307-310.
11. Gassert C. A model for defining information requirements. In: Mills M, Romano C, Heller B (eds.). Information Management in Nursing and Health Care. Springhouse, PA: Springhouse Corporation; 1996:7-15.
12. Gassert C. Defining information requirements using holistic models: Introduction to a case study. Hol Nurs Pract. 1996;11(1):64-74.
13. Gassert C. Using a revised model to identify information requirements for cardiac surgery patients operating mobile computing technology. In: Gerdin U, Tallberg M, Wainwright P (eds.). Nursing Informatics - The Impact of Nursing Knowledge on Health Care Informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1997:172-175.
14. Goossen W, Epping P, Dassen T, Hasman A, van den Heuvel W. Can we solve current problems with nursing information systems? Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1997;54(1-2):85-91.
15. Collen MF. General requirements for a medical information system (MIS). Comput Biomed Res. 1970;3(5):393-406.
16. Ball M, Collen MF (eds.). Aspects of the computerbased patient record. New York: Springer Verlag, 1992.
17. Murphy J, Ahlstrom J. Nursing process redesign with the implementation of a computer based patient record in the ambulatory setting. In: Gerdin U, Tallberg M, Wainwright P (eds.). Nursing Informatics - The Impact of Nursing Knowledge on Health Care Informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1997:323-327.
18. Hannah KJ, Ball MJ, Edwards MJ. Introduction to Nursing Informatics. New York: Springer; 1999.
19. Lagemann A. Integration des Verfahrens Pflegedokumentation in ein Klinisches Arbeitsplatzsystem. Bericht, Nr: Department of Medical Informatics, Report No. 3196; 1996.
20. Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics. Support of the nursing process through the use of information and communication technologies. Department of Medical Informatics University of Heidelberg. Available at: http://www.med.uniheidelberg.de/mi/projects/ nursing/nurs_ho.htm. Accessed: April 2000.
21. Manning J, McConnell EA. Technology assessment - A framework for generating questions useful in evaluation nursing information systems. Comput Nurs. 1997;15(3):141-146.
22. Milholland DJ. Information systems in critical care: A measure of their effectiveness. In: RA Greenes, HE Peteron, DJ Protti (eds.). Medinfo 95 - Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Medical Informatics. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1995: 395-399.
23. Strachan H. Nursing informatics: A delphi study. In: Brender J, Christensen JP, Scherer JR, McNair P (eds.). Medical Informatics Europe'96. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1996:867-871.
24. Friedman CP, Wyatt JC. Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics. New York: Springer; 1997.
25. Heathfield HP, Peee V, Hudson P, Kay S, et al. Evaluating large scale health information systems: From practice towards theory. In: Masys D (ed.). AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1997:116-120.
26. Brender J. Trends in assessment of IT-based solutions in healthcare and recommendations for the future. Int J Med Inf. 1998;52(1-2):217-227.