Impact of Clinical Information Systems on Nursing Practice Nurses' Perspectives

Computers in Nursing

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 156-163

  Axford, Rita L ^a   Carter, Barbara E L ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Clinical information systems; Computer systems; Nursing practice; Nursing research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING CARE; NURSING STAFF; RANDOMIZATION; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; NURSING CARE; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030137291     PISSN: 07368593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andersen C. Attitudes and perceived levels of knowledge of nurse anesthesia educators with respect to computers. J Am Assoc Nurs Anesth. 1988;56:423-430.
2. Armstrong ML. Computer competence for nurse educators. Image J Nurs Sch. 1986;18:155-160.
3. Ball MJ, Snelbecker GE, Schecter SL. Nurses' perceptions concerning computer uses before and after a computer literacy lecture. Comput Nurs. 1985;3:23-32.
4. McConnel A, O'Shea SS, Kirchhoff K. RN attitudes toward computers. Nurs Manag. 1989;14:36-40.
5. Scarpa R, Smeltzer SC, Jasion B. Attitudes of nurses toward computerisation: A replication. Comput Nurs. 1992;10:72-80.
6. Stronge JH, Brodt A. Assessment of nurses' attitudes toward computerization. Comput Nurs. 1985;3:154-158.
7. Ball MJ, Douglas JV. Preparing medical informaticians: A cross-disciplinary approach. Comput Healthcare. 1992;7:38-41.
8. Brodt A, Stronge JH. Nurses attitudes toward computerization in a midwestern community hospital. Comput Nurs. 1986;4:82-86.
9. Sorrentino EA. Overcoming the barriers to automation. Nurs Forum. 1991;26:21-23.
10. Stone V. Attitudes of nurses toward computer usage and how computer use influences these attitudes. In: Hovenga EJS, Hannah KJ, McCormick KA, Ronald JS, eds. Nursing Informatics '91 Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Nurses Using Computers. New York, NY: Springer Verlag Publishers; 1991:777-779.
11. Hendrickson G, Kovner CT. Effects of computers on nursing resource use. Comput Nurs. 1990;8:16-22.
12. Mowry MM, Korpman RA. Evaluating automated information systems. Nurs Econ. 1987;5:7-12.
13. Staggers N. Using computers in nursing: Documented benefits and needed studies. Comput Nurs. 1988;6:164-170.
14. Zielstorff R. Cost effectiveness of computerization in nursing practice and administration. J Nurs Adm. 1985;15:22-26.
15. Murphy CA, Maynard M, Morgan G. Pretest and post-test attitudes of nursing personnel toward a patient care information system. Comput Nurs. 1994;12:239-244.
16. Ngin P, Simms LM, Erbin-Roesemann M. Work excitement among computer users in nursing. Comput Nurs. 1993;3:127-133.
17. Berg CM. Computerization of the operating room. In: Nursing and Computers, Third International Symposium of Nursing Use of Computers and Information Science. Washington DC: CV Mosby Co; 1988:113-115.
18. Department of Health (Victoria). Study of Professional Issues in Nursing: The Impact of Technology on Nursing. Victoria, Australia: Department of Health; 1988.
19. Burkes M. Identifying and relating nurses' attitudes toward computer use. Comput Nurs. 1991;9:190-201.
20. Reznikoff M, Holland CH, Stroevel CF. Attitudes toward computers among employees of a psychiatric hospital. Mental Hyg. 1967;51:419-425.
21. Startsman TS, Robinson RE. The attitudes of medical and paramedical personnel towards computers. Comput Biomed Res. 1972;5:218-227.
22. Thies JB. Hospital personnel and computer-based systems: A study of attitudes and perceptions. Hosp Adm. 1975;20:17-26.
23. Herring D, Rochman R. A closer look at bedside terminals. Nurs Manag. 1990;6:164-170.
24. Kahl K, Ivancin L, Fuhrmann M. Identifying the savings potential of bedside terminals. Nurs Econ. 1991;9:391-400.
25. Gross MS. The potential of professional nursing information systems. Secretary's Commission on Nursing Prepared for the US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary's Commission on Nursing. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1988.
26. Brunt JH. An exploration of the relationship between nurses' empathy and technology. Nurs Adm Quart. 1985;9:69-78.
27. Carnevali DL. Nursing perspectives in health care technology. Nurs Adm Quart. 1985;9:10-18.
28. Henderson V. The essence of nursing in high technology. Nurs Adm Quart. 1985;9:1-9.
29. Simpson R, Brown LN. High-touch/high-technology computer applications in nursing. Nurs Adm Quart. 1985;9:62-68
30. Ball MJ, Hannah KJ, Jelger VG, Peterson H. Nursing Informatics: Where Caring and Technology Meet. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1989.
31. Sneddon M, Thomas S. Attitudes to computers in a teaching hospital. Aust Health Rev 1988;11:218-223.
32. Ozbolt JG, Bulechek G, Graves JR, et al. Report of the Priority Expert Panel on Nursing Informatics. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health; 1992.
33. Stern PN. Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes. Image J Nurs Sch. 1980;12:20-23.
34. Turner BA. Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: One way of organising the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory. Quality and Quantity. 1981;15:225-247.
35. Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1978.
36. Knapp TR. Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: An attempt to resolve the controversy. Nurs Res. 1990;39:121-123.