Developing the research capacity of departments of nursing and midwifery based in higher education: A review of the literature

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 57-65

  Cooke, Alison ^a   Green, Barbara ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; HUMAN; MIDWIFE; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; REVIEW; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FACULTY, NURSING; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MIDWIFERY; NURSING RESEARCH; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 0034223071     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01447.x     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Anthony D. (1997) Funding research in nursing: results of the RAE. Nursing Standard 11, 32-33.
2. Babu A.R. & Singh Y.P. (1998) Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics 43, 309-329.
3. Baird L.L. (1986) What characterises a productive research department? Research in Higher Education 25, 211-225.
4. Banks B.E.C. (1995) An uncompromising view of nurse education, England, 1995. Nurse Education Today 15, 315-316.
5. Bassett C.C. (1993) Role of the nurse teacher as researcher. British Journal of Nursing 2, 911-912, 917-918.
6. Bassett C.C. (1994) Nurse teachers' attitudes to research: a phenomenological study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19, 585-592.
7. Bazeley P. (1994) From vocational college to new university: the research profile and development needs of academic staff in a period of transition. Higher Education Research and Development 13, 121-132.
8. Camiah S. (1997) Issues facing nurse teachers on the pre-registration diploma of higher education course (Project 2000): a case study approach. Nurse Education Today 17, 203-208.
9. Camiah S. (1998) New skills required of nurse tutors in the UK: a study within two Project 2000 schemes for pre-registration nursing courses. Nurse Education Today 18, 93-100.
10. Clifford C. (1993) The role of nurse teachers in the empowerment of nurses through research. Nurse Education Today 13, 47-54.
11. Clifford C. (1995) The role of nurse teachers: concerns, conflicts and challenges. Nurse Education Today 15, 11-16.
12. Clifford C. (1997) Nurse teachers and research. Nurse Education Today 17, 115-120.
13. Collins B.A. (1993) A review and integration of knowledge about faculty research productivity. Journal of Professional Nursing 9, 159-168.
14. Department of Health (1993) Report of the Taskfores on the Strategy for Research in Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.
15. Draper P. (1996a) Guest editorial: What are the implications of integration for nursing research and nursing education? Nurse Education Today 16, 239-240.
16. Draper P. (1996b) Editorial: The merger of United Kingdom colleges of nursing with university departments of nursing: prospects, promises and problems. Journal of Advanced Nursing 23, 215-216.
17. Dundar H. & Lewis D.R. (1998) Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education 39, 607-631.
18. Emden C. (1998) Establishing a 'track record': research productivity and nursing academe. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 16, 29-33.
19. Farrington A. (1996) Comment: Developing a research culture for nursing in higher education. British Journal of Nursing 5, 57-58.
20. Gander J.P. (1995) Academic research and teaching productivities: a case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 49, 311-319.
21. Joint Funding Councils of the UK (1996) 1996 Research Assessment Exercise: the outcome. Available from: http://www.niss. ac.uk/education/hefc/rae96/cl_96.html [Accessed on 9.6.98].
22. Jowett S., Walton I. & Payne S. (1994) Challenges and Change in Nurse Education: a study of the implementation of Project 2000. National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales, Berkshire.
23. Kiger A. (1994) Nursing education and the Research Assessment Exercises. Nurse Researcher 1, 85-95.
24. Kirk S., Carlisle C. & Luker K.A. (1997) The implications of Project 2000 and the formation of links with higher education for the professional and academic needs of nurse teachers in the United Kingdom. Journal of Advanced Nursing 26, 1036-1044.
25. Kitson A. (1997) Lessons from the 1996 Research Assessment Exercise. Nurse Researcher 4, 81-93.
26. Kohlenberg E.M. (1992) Faculty research productivity and organisational structure in schools of nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing 8, 271-275.
27. Marsland D. (1993) Viewpoint: Research and destroy. Nursing Standard 7, 45.
28. McMahon A. & Kitson A. (1997) Supporting R & D: the role of a professional organisation, part 1. Nursing Standard 12, 36-38.
29. Mead D., Moseley L. & Cook R. (1997) Positive thinking... research assessment exercise. Nursing Times 93, 30-32.
30. Melland H.L. (1995) Nurse educators and the demands of research. Journal of Nursing Education 34, 71-76.
31. National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting in Northern Ireland (1990) Attitudes towards research: Report of a survey of views of nursing service and nursing educational staff in Northern Ireland. Occasional Paper no. 1. National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting in Northern Ireland, Belfast.
32. Nolan M. & Nolan J. (1994) Long hours, little thanks: valuing the role of nurse educators. British Journal of Nursing 3, 984-985.
33. Nolan M. (1998) Towards the next research assessment exercise. British Journal of Nursing 7, 6.
34. Norbeck J.S. (1998) Teaching, research and service: striking the balance in doctoral education. Journal of Professional Nursing 14, 197-205.
35. Procter S. (1997) Editorial: Developing research capacity in nursing. Journal of Nursing Management 5, 321-323.
36. Ramsden P. (1994) Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education 28, 207-226.
37. Roberts K. (1997) Nurse academics' scholarly productivity: framed by the system, facilitated by mentoring. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 14, 5-14.
38. Robinson J. (1993) Nursing and the research assessment exercise: what counts? Nurse Researcher 1, 84-93.
39. Sleep J., Bullock I. & Grayson K. (1995) Establishing priorities for research in education within one college of nursing and midwifery. Nurse Education Today 15, 439-445.
40. Smith L. (1994) An analysis and reflections on the quality of nursing research in 1992. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19, 385-393.
41. Tierney A.J. (1994) An analysis of nursing's performance in the 1992 assessment of research in British universities. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19, 593-602.
42. Traynor M. & Rafferty A.M. (1998) Nursing Research and the Higher Education Context. Centre for Policy in Nursing Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.
43. Trostle J. & Simon J. (1992) Building applied health research capacity in less developed countries: problems encountered by the ADDR project. Social Science and Medicine 35, 1379-1387.
44. Trostle J. (1992) Research capacity building in international health: definitions, evaluations and strategies for success. Social Science and Medicine 35, 1321-1324.
45. Universities Funding Council (1992) Research Assessment Exercise 1992: The Outcome. Available from: http://www. niss.ac.uk/education/hefc/rae92/c26_92.html [Accessed on 9.6.98].
46. Watson R. (1997) Guest Editorial: United Kingdom universities' Research Assessment Exercise 1996: critique, comment and concern. Journal of Advanced Nursing 26, 641-642.
47. Wood F. (1990) Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff. Higher Education 19, 81-100.