Torsional resistance of crowns cemented to composite cores involving three stainless steel endodontic post designs

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 38-42

  Cohen, Brett I ^a,c   Penugonda, Bapanaiah ^a,b   Pagnillo, Mark K ^a   Schulman, Allan ^a,b   Hittelman, Eugene ^a  

^a Essential Dental Laboratories   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Essential Dental Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; STAINLESS STEEL; TI CORE COMPOSITE RESIN; TI-CORE COMPOSITE RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; INCISOR; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INCISOR; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TORQUE;

EID: 0034222483     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2000.107915     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cohen BI, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. A 10-year literature review of a split-shanked threaded post. Compendium 1995;16:630-1.
2. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:458-64.
3. O'Brien W. Dental materials properties and selection. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1989. p. 231-3.
4. Burgess JO, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. The resistance to tensile, compression, and torsional forces provided by four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:899-903.
5. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:401-5.
6. Ricker JB, Lautenschlager EP, Greener EH. Mechanical properties of post and core systems. Dent Mater 1986;2:63-6.
7. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Condos S, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:487-95.
8. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the torsional forces at failure for seven endodontic post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:350-7.
9. Trabert KC, Caputo AA, Abou-Ross M. Tooth fracture a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endodont 1987;4:341-5.
10. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:39-44.
11. Cohen BI, Condos S, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic post. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:178-82.
12. Deutsch AS, Musikant BL, Cavallari J, Bernardi S. Retentive properties of a new post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:12-4.
13. Robbins JW. Guideline for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:558-62.
14. Assif D, Bleicher S. Retentive of serrated endodontic posts with a composite luting agent: effect of cement thickness. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 56:689-91.
15. Deutsch AS, Musikant BL, Cavallari J, Tritchler D, Lepley JB. Torque placed by dentists on prefabricated threaded posts. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:323-5.
16. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Fracture strength of three core restorative materials supported with or without a prefabricated split-shank post. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:560-5.
17. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Effects of three bonding systems on the torsional resistance of titanium-reinforced composite cores supported by two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81:678-83.
18. Cohen BI, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive properties of two hollow-tube post systems to those of a solid post design. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:234-8.
19. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Condos S, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Post Removal using a thick-walled hollow tube post design. Oral Health 1994;11:15-22.
20. Cohen BI, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the photoelastic stress for a split-shank threaded post versus a threaded post. J Prosthodont 1994;3:53-5.
21. Cohen BI, Condos S. Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Pilot study comparing the photoelastic stress distribution for four endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:679-85.
22. Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. The relationship between abutment taper and resistance of cemented crowns to dynamic loading. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:117-39.
23. Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. The effect of tooth preparation height and diameter on the resistance of complete crowns to fatigue loading. Int J Prosthet 1997;10:207-15.
24. Freeman MA, Nicholls JI, Kydd WL, Harrington GW. Leakage associated with load fatigue-induced preliminary failure of full crowns placed over three different post and core systems. J Endodont 1998;24:26-32.
25. Information concerning Flexi-Flow cement and Ti-Core core material can be found at http://www.edsdental.com.