|
Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 332-333
|
Common Bile Duct Stones: Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography vs. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Detection
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CHOLESTASIS;
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
GALLSTONE;
HUMAN;
IMAGE PROCESSING;
METHODOLOGY;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE;
CHOLESTASIS;
GALLSTONES;
HUMANS;
IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 0034217873
PISSN: 1091255X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80002-5 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (10)
|