Accounting for faculty productivity in the research university

Review of Higher Education

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 17-37

  Presley, Jennifer B ^b   Engelbride, Edward P ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032172625     PISSN: 01625748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.1998.0018     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aery, S. R., Secretary of the Maryland Higher Education Commission. (1992, December 4). Letter to Donald N. Langenberg, Chancellor of the University of Maryland System.
2. Aery, S. R., Secretary of the Maryland Higher Education Commission. (1993, June 7). Letter to the Honorable Barbara A. Hoffman.
3. Berdahl, R. O. (1971). Statewide Coordination of Higher Education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
4. Curry, D. J., & Fischer, N. M. (1986, February). Public higher education and the state: Models for financing, bubgeting, and accountability. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. San Antonio, TX.
5. Eaton, G. (1990, December 11). Internal memorandum to the USM accountability Group. Office of Academic Affairs, University System of Maryland, Adelphi, MD.
6. Giles-Gee, H., & Miyares, J. (1997). Initiatives aimed at increasing faculty productivity. Metropolitan Universities, 7(4), 75-88.
7. Hauke, R. (1994). Faculty workload activities. Topeka: Kansas Board of Regents.
8. Hines, E. R. (1988). Higher education and state governments: Renewed partnership, cooperation, or competition. ASHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 5. Washington, DC: George Washington University/ERIC.
9. Hines, E. R., & Higham, J. R. (1996, November). Faculty workload and state policy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Memphis, TN.
10. Hoblitzell A. P., Jr. (1987). Higher education: An investment in excellence. Report of the Governor's Commission on Excellence in Higher Education. Annapolis, MD: Governor's Commission.
11. Kennedy, D. (1995). Another century's end, another revolution for higher education. Change, 27(3), 8-15.
12. Layzell, D. T. (1996). Faculty workload and productivity: Recurrent issues with new imperatives. The Review of Higher Education, 19(3), 267-281.
13. Maryland General Assembly. (1994). Report of the Chairmen of the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee and the House Appropriations Committee. Annapolis, MD: Department of Legislative Services.
14. Maryland General Assembly. (1997). Report of the Chairmen of the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee and the House Appropriations Committee. Annapolis, MD: Department of Legislative Services.
15. Maryland Higher Education Commission (1994, March). Core faculty teaching and the enhancement of campus budget flexibility. Currents, No. 1, pp. 1-2.
16. McGuinness, A. (1994). The states and higher education. In P. G. Altbach, R. O. Berdahl, & P. J. Gumport (Eds.), Higher education in American society (3rd ed., pp. 155-180). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
17. Miller, M. A. (1994). Pressures to measure faculty work. In J. F. Wergin (Ed.). Analyzing faculty workload (pp. 5-14). New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 83. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
18. National Research Council (1995). Research-doctorate programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. Newman, F. (1987). Choosing quality: Reducing conflict between the states and the university. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
20. Ratchford, W. S. (1996, June 13). Letter to Senator Hoffman and Delegate Rawlings. Annapolis, MD: Department of Fiscal Services.
21. Slaughter, J. B., Chancellor of the University of Maryland College Park. (1987, January 28). Memorandum to J. S. Toll, President of the University of Maryland. Re: Effect of the Commission of Excellence Report on Enrollment and Resources at University of Maryland College Park.
22. University System of Maryland Board of Regents (1994, August). Policy on faculty workload and responsibilities, II-1.25. Adelphi, MD: Author.
23. University System of Maryland (1996, December 1). A report to the joint chairs of the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee and the House Appropriations Committee on the workload of the USM faculty. Adelphi, MD: Author.
24. University System of Maryland (1997, December 1). A report to the joint chairs of the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee and the House Appropriations Committee on the workload of the USM faculty. Adelphi, MD: Author.
25. University of Maryland (1994). University Senate policy on faculty instructional activity. College Park, MD: Author.
26. Wergin, J. F. (Ed.). (1994). Analyzing faculty workload. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 83. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.