Selective effects of prior motivational experience on current on-line control of attention

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 43, Issue 1-3, 2000, Pages 365-370

  Poulsen, Catherine ^a   Segalowitz, Norman ^a  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORPUS STRIATUM; DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CORPUS STRIATUM; DOPAMINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0034212870     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. 1994. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Derryberry, D. 1993. Attentional consequences of outcome-related motivational states: Congruent, incongruent, and focusing effects. Motivation and Emotion, 17, 65-89.
3. Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. 1994. Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The Heart's Eye: Emotional Influences in Perception and Attention. San Diego: Academic Press.
4. Dunnett, S. B., & Robbins, R. W. 1992. The functional role of mesotelencephalic dopamine systems. Biological Review, 67, 491-518.
5. Monsell, S. 1996. Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved Mysteries of the Mind: Tutorial Essays in Cognition (pp. 93-148). Hove, UK: Erlbaum, Taylor & Francis.
6. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. 1986. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J., Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and Self-regulation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum.
7. Reason, J. 1984. Lapses of attention in everyday life. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of Attention (pp. 515-549). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
8. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. 1995. Costs of predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
9. Rogers, R. D., Sahakian, B. J., Hodges, J. R., Polkey, C. E., Kennard, C., & Robbins, T. W. 1998. Dissociating executive mechanisms of task control following frontal lobe damage and Parkinson's disease. Brain, 121, 815-842.
10. Segalowitz, N., Poulsen, C., & Segalowitz, S. (in press). RT coefficient of variation is differentially sensitive to executive control involvement in an attention switching task. Brain and Cognition.
11. Shallice, T. 1988. From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
12. Shallice, T. 1994. Multiple levels of control processes. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV (pp. 395-420). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Stuss, D. T., Shallice, T., Alexander, M. P., & Picton, T. W. 1995. A multidisciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769, 191-211.