Effect of stepped vs. continuous light curing exposure on bond strengths to dentin

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 123-128

  Price, Richard B ^a   Bannerman, Ronald A ^b   Rizkalla, Amin S ^a   Hall, Gordon C ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; EBS ADHESIVE SYSTEM; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PERTAC BOND; PERTAC-BOND; PHOSPHORIC ACID; POLYMER; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE; SINGLE BOND; WATER; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ADHESION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; HUMAN; LIGHT; MECHANICAL STRESS; RADIATION DOSE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; TEMPERATURE; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADHESIVENESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LIGHT; METHACRYLATES; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMERS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WATER; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0034208991     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Uno S, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at a reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99:440-444.
2. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, et al. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:322-326.
3. Lösche GM. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: Guided polymerization vs. reduced light intensity. J Adhesive Dent 1999;1:31-39.
4. Koran P, Kürschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998;11:17-22.
5. Hasegawa T, Retief DH, Russell CM, et al. Shear bond strength and quantitative microleakage of a multipurpose dental adhesive system resin bonded to dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:432-438.
6. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL. Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent 1994;7:175-179.
7. Price RBT, Hall GC. In vitro comparison of 10 minute vs. 24 hour shear bond strengths of six dentin bonding systems. Quintessence Int 1999;30:122-134.
8. Swift EJ Jr, Bayne SC. Shear bond strength of a new one-bottle dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 1997;10:184-188.
9. Muñoz-Viveros CA, Dunn JR, Liu P, et al. Early shear bond strength of six dentin bonding systems. J Dent Res 1997;76:187 (Abstr 1391).
10. Chain MC, Retief DH, Denys FR, et al. Laboratory evaluation of the A.R.T. bonding system. Am J Dent 1994;7:195-199.
11. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-1399.
12. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage at the dentin/restoration interface. Am J Dent 1994; 7:43-46.
13. Perdigão J, Swift EJ, Jr, Denehy GE, et al. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 1994;73:44-55.
14. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater 1998;14:120-128.
15. Olio, G, Austrheim E Kr. In vitro quality testing of dentin adhesives. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:263-269.
16. Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Satoh M, et al. Early bonding of resin cements to dentin: Effect of bonding environment. Oper Dent 1996;21:196-202.
17. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from over-drying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996;12:236-244.
18. Haller B, Hofmann N, Klaiber B, et al. Effect of storage media on microleakage of five dentin bonding agents. Dent Mater 1993;9:191-197.
19. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. Interfacial ultrastructure of the resinenamel region of three adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1998;11:13-16.
20. Meiers JC, Shook LW. Effect of disinfectants on the bond strength of composite to dentin. Am J Dent 1996;9:11-14.
21. Jacobsen T, Söderholm KJ. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995;11:132-136.
22. Nystrom GP, Holtan JR, Phelps II RA, et al. Temperature and humidity effects on bond strength of a dentinal adhesive. Oper Dent 1998;23:138-143.
23. Spierings THAM, Peters MCRB, Plasschaert AJM. Surface temperature of oral tissue. A review. J Biol Buccale 1984;12:91-99.
24. Söderholm KJM. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: A report of the ASC MD156 Task Group on Test Methods for the Adhesion of Restorative Materials. Dent Mater 1991;7:74-83.
25. Van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, et al. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1991;70:889-893.
26. Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. Teaching class I and class II direct composite restorations: Results of a survey of dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:1415-1421.
27. Curing lights sold in USA by dealers in 1998. Strategic Dental Marketing, New York City, NY.
28. Hinoura K, Miyazaki M, Onose H. Effect of irradiation time to light-cured resin composite on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent 1991;4:273-276.
29. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:133-138.
30. Leung RL, Fan PL, Johnston WM. Post-irradiation polymerization of visible light-activated composite resin. J Dent Res 1983;62:363-365.
31. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, et al. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 1996;9:167-173.
32. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelman K-H. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without "softstart-polymerization". J Dent 1997;25:321-330.
33. Goracci G, Mori G, Casa de'Martinis L. Curing light intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996;27:355-362.
34. Unterbrink GL, Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 1995;23:183-189.
35. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in resin composite in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639.
36. May KN, Swift EJ, Bayne SC. Bond strength of a new dentin adhesive system. Am J Dent 1997;10:195-198.
37. De Goes MF, Ferrari Pachane GC, Garcia-Godoy F. Resin bond strength with different methods to remove excess water from the dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:298-301.
38. Kanca J III. Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996;9:273-276.
39. Kanca J III. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992;5:213-215.
40. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: Its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992;5:127-129.
41. Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Microleakage of bonding agents with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent 1996;9:34-36.
42. Finger WJ, Uno S. Bond strength of Gluma CPS using the moist dentin bonding technique. Am J Dent 1996;9:27-30.