The accuracy of spiral tomography to assess bone quantity for the preoperative planning of implants in the posterior maxilla

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 242-247

  Serhal, Charbel Bou ^a   Jacobs, Reinhilde ^a,c   Persoons, Marc ^a   Hermans, Robert ^b   Van Steenberghe, Daniel ^a  

^a Oral Pathol MS   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Maxilla; Maxillary sinus; Planning; Tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; BICUSPID; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; HUMANS; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MOLAR; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY;

EID: 0034208064     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003242.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Astrand, K. & Reichmann, S. (1974) Optimised tomography. Theoretical and practical analyses of the elimination of depiction errors in tomography. Acta Radiologica 338 (Suppl.): 1-76.
2. Bolin, A., Eliasson, S., von Beetzen, M. & Jansson, L. (1996) Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations. Clinical Oral Implants Research 7: 354-359.
3. Bou Serhal, C., Jacobs, R., Persoons, M. & van Steenberghe, D. (1998) A comparison between panoramic radiographs, scanograms and conventional tomograms in locating the maxillary sinus. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 27 (Suppl. 1), abstract no. 21.
4. Ekestubbe, A., Thilander, A., Gröndhal, K. & Gröndhal, H.G. (1993) Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 22: 13-17.
5. Ekestubbe, A., Gröndhal, K. & Gröndhal, H.G. (1997) The use of tomography for dental implant planning. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 26: 206-213.
6. Jacobs, R. & van Steenberghe, D. (1997) Imaging procedures for pre-operative assessment. In: Jacobs, R. & van Steenberghe, D., eds. Radiographic planning and assessment of endosseous oral implants, ch 1, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. Jacobs, R., Adriansens, A., Naert, I., Quirynen, M., Hermans, R. & van Steenberghe D. (1999) Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre-operative planning of endosseous implants. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 28: 37-41.
8. Kim, K.D. & Park, C.S. (1997) Reliability of spiral tomography for implant site measurement of the mandible compared with DentaScan computed tomography. In: Farman, A.G., Ruprecht, A., Gibbs, S.J. & Scarfe, W.C., eds. Advances in Maxillofacial Imaging, 119-126. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.
9. Klinge, B., Petersson, A. & Maly, P. (1989) Location of the man dibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 4: 327-332.
10. Lindh, C. & Petersson, A. (1989) Radiologic examination for location of the mandibular canal: A comparison between panoramic radiography and conventional tomography. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 4: 249-253.
11. Lindh, C., Petersson, A. & Klinge, B. (1992) Visualisation of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques. Clinical Oral Implants Research 3: 90-97.
12. Lindh, C., Petersson, A. & Klinge, B. (1995) Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clinical Oral Implants Research 6: 96-103.
13. Quirynen, M., Lamoral, Y., Dekeyser, C., Peene, P., van Steenberghe, D., Bonte, J. & Baert, A. (1990) The CT scan standard reconstruction technique for reliable jaw bone volume determination. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 5: 384-389.
14. Reddy, M.S., Mayfield-Donahoo, T., Vanderven, F.J. & Jeffcoat, M.K. (1994) A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 5: 229-238.