Comparison studies of GT and MRI in patients with hepatic metastases

ONCOLOGY

Volumn 14, Issue 6 SUPPL. 3, 2000, Pages 21-28

  Earls, James P ^a,b  

^a INOVA FAIRFAX HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LIVER TUMOR; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; REVIEW;

CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0034203119     PISSN: 08909091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Zerhouni EA, Rutter C, Hamilton SR, et al: CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II. Radiology 200:443-451, 1996.
2. Rummeny EJ, Wernecke K, Saini S, et al: Comparison between high-field-strength MRI and CT for screening of hepatic metastases: A receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 182:879-886, 1992.
3. Semelka RC, Worawattanakul S, Kelekis NL, et al: Liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: Comparison of single-phase spiral CT and current MR techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:1040-1047, 1997.
4. Fretz CJ, Stark DD, Metz CE, et al: Detection of hepatic metastases: Comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, unenhanced MRI, and iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 155:763-770, 1990.