Quality requirements in rapidly growing higher education systems: The Israeli example

Higher Education Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 157-171

  Mehrez, Abraham ^a   Mizrahi, Shlomo ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Information; Israel; Quality requirements; Sensitivity to quality variations

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034196302     PISSN: 09528733     EISSN: 17403863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8733(99)00023-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bazaraa, M. S., & Shetty, C. M. (1979). Nonlinear programming. New York: John Wiley.
2. Bessent, A. M., Bessent, E. W., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Throgood, N. C. (1983). Evaluation of educational proposals by means of DEA. Educational Administration, 19, 82-107.
3. Chapman, K. (1995). Quality, standards and degrees — some speculations aroused by Johnston. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20, 509-514.
4. Cohon, J. (1978). Multiobjective programming and planning. New York: Academic Press.
5. Davis, J. M. (1994). The development of a valid and reliable instrument to measure customer focus in higher education. DAI-a, 55/02, 226.
6. Frost, S., Hearn, J. C., & Marine, G. M. (1997). State policy and the public research university: a case study of manifest and latent tensions. The Journal of Higher Education, 68, 363-397.
7. George, P. J., & McAllister, J. A. (1995). The expending role of the state in Canadian universities: can university autonomy and accountability be reconciled? Higher Education in Management, 7, 309-321.
8. Hopkins, D. S. P. (1979). Computer models employed in university administration: The Stanford experience. Interface, 9, 13-22.
9. Hopkins, D. S. P., Larreche, J. C., & Massy, W. F. (1977). Constrained optimization of a university administrators preference function. Management Science, 24, 365-377.
10. Joiner, C. (1980). Academic planning through the goal programming model. Interface, 10, 86-91.
11. Keeney, L. K., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision making with multiple objective. New York: John Wiley.
12. Leland, H. E. (1979). Quacks, lemons, and licensing: a theory of minimum quality standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 1328-1346.
13. Massy, W. F. (1973). A dynamic equilibrium model for university budget planning. Management Science, 23, 248-256.
14. McGuinness, A. C. (1995). The changing relationship between the states and universities in the United States. Higher Education Management, 3, 263-277.
15. Mehrez, A., & Reichel, A. (1998). The development of the School of Management at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Higher Education Management, 10, 105-117.
16. Owlia, M. S., & Aspinwall, E. M. (1996). Quality in higher education — a survey. Total Quality Management, 7, 161-171.
17. Rozanski, E. P. (1994). Quality: a comparative analysis of accredited and non-accredited computer science programs of selected measures of quality. DAI-a, 55/06.
18. Sherman, N. (1995). The expansion of higher education in Israel and the regional colleges. Rehovot: Development Study Center (Hebrew).
19. Sinuany-Stern, Z. (1984). A network optimization model for budget allocation in a multi-campus university. Journal of Operational Research Society, 35, 749-757.
20. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A., & Barboy, A. (1994). Academic department efficiency via DEA. Computer and Operation Research, 21, 543-556.
21. Sizer, J., & Mackie, D. (1995). Greater accountability: the price of autonomy. Higher Education Management, 7, 323-333.
22. Toren, N., & Nvo-Ingber, J. (1989). Organizational response to the decline in the academic marketplace. Higher Education, 18, 453-471.
23. Wagner, A. (1996). Financing higher education: new approaches, new issues. Higher Education Management, 8, 7-17.